Mitt should be working to re-elect Obama.
He'd do much better financially.
When we look at Republicans and Democrats by the numbers, the results are very interesting.
In the last 50 years, Republicans have held the White House for 28 years.
Democrats have held it for 22 years.
Republicans created 24 million jobs.
Democrats created 42 million jobs.
Republicans got a stock market return of 109%.
Democrats got a stock market return of 992%.
Annualized, that's 2.7% for Republicans.
Annualized, that's 11% for Democrats.
Republicans had GDP growth of 2.7%.
Democrats had GDP growth of 4.1%
Republicans saw income grow 0.6%
Democrats saw income grow 2.2%.
By any economic measure---these figures are from the US Dept. of Labor---the overall economy performs much better when a Democrat is in the White House.
As is obvious to all but the comatose, Romney and Ryan are focused on the classic right-wing social issues and their desire to recreate the Great Depression by shredding the social safety net and deliberately making life harder for the needy and for the working poor.
Every economic 'idea" they have promoted will widen the already_obscene_wealth and income gap, further shrink the weakened middle class, and reward the wealthy with even more wealth.
So tell me again, conservatives----why on Earth would any thinking person vote for Romney
.................................................................
:0074
However, the last time the US saw this type of anti-American sentiment in the ME was under Carter - another weak President.
I voted for Carter in 1980, I was young and Dumb.
:0008
Now you're just dumb.I voted for Carter in 1980, I was young and Dumb.
:0008
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
