this board's dead

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
i'll preface this by saying, i'm hardly here, though when i am, have seen, very little of ... a discussion amongst members regarding games, sides, opinions AT ALL. There is an ongoing discuss about Pats V Chargers, but past that.. liek zilch (bp has been following min).

there was a matchup forum awhile back, where this one fella, jus dropped huge amounts of all things realting to that game. Each orig post was titled that games matchup (ie. New England at San Diego) I mean, any lil thing from a roster change, to illness, to off field action, to weather, he was on it. Now--is that the stuff, i'm looking for? Not exactly, as i hardly ever used those pages to help me in making my selections. As it were, this main forum was more of a happening place to find guys hashing out the correct sides of most any game -or so it seemed. maybe i'm remembering wrong.

all i'm saying, with the traffic thats on this site, one would think everyones gearing up for a fri night game between NE and SD with no games on the weekend. I'm not a great contributor either... and to be entirely forthcoming, some of this week's matchups look like head scratchers.... which is why i'm here, looking for -insight, input, opinions....

please, let me be clear...i'm not looking for anyone to make my decisions for me, jus provide alternate takes on, perspectives... things to think about re: that game -and process on my own to come up with side etc.

mostly what i see is people running off their picks with record keeping and all that... but aside from a select few, that amounts pretty much to breaking even. and hey, thats fine if you're trying to keep track of your record, selections etc. people appreciate that--and i'm not trying to discourage it. and, i know, not everyone is great, or has time for writeups -thats cool, i understand this.

i dunno,....

i distinctly remember a poster, not his name, but the fact was a syracuse (i know is CFB, but using as an example) kid -either attending, or jus closely following- and he was great with his take on that week's upcoming 'cuse matchup -(more from a bettor's perspective than homer). i guess i kinda see the same in bleeding purples weekly vikings discuss...which is what i guess was expecting (more of). i mean, i know everyone has their lives, jobs, kids etc,, etc.... and who wants to make one of their remaining outlets for fun, into work i don't ..and i think you know thats not what i'm suggesting. (i mean, if you ended up winning $$$ that week, on a regular basis--would easily be fun, yeah?). despite the differences between everyone up in here (which is actually a welcomed trait, so to have differing perspectives) i jus figured there'd be a lot more back and forth... discussion.

i'm no great shakes on my own. my post tally speaks to how much i should not try and come accross as a hypocrite here... though, to be clear... not trying to rustle any feathers...jus wonderin where all the action is?

i would figure amongst the group of semi educated fellas up in here, we'd be able to--as a group, pull together on at least a handful of games each week to hone in on. better than the desired tune of the accepted 65% that most people consider a "winning" number.

i know, i saw mj goin off... asking everyone on their best plays threads (both 1st, ml -and even someone else chimed in, for fun, sure, but theres definitely more to it there on peep's 2nd best) both in college and pros... i dunno if tallying a total of sides there, like the posts that senor capper has porvided in his hilton following would be a start... i'm jus... taken at how this board isnt utilized more like i think could be--for benefit of everyone. thats me. maybe i'm off base. maybe its the weather changing... maybe everyone if hunkering down with holidays coming up... maybe i jus read at wrong times...


i dunno... :shrug:
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,416
242
63
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
I agree..

I am hesitant posting a weekly Vikes thread because I am too much of a homer..

I can try to research and keep up with all the NFC North games.. Give me something to do during the slow days at work.
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
What are your thoughts on the Pats game? Any local insight that hasn't hit national news?


its a deion branch love fest here. everyone already past whining about "how we gonna stretch the field w/o randy?" and basking in win over baltimore. not even hearing much about merriweather hit--though even i, a non-pats fan in boston, already have forgotten about -except to have reminded of in every sportscenter episode. people here happy with def vs rice and think flacco not a SB caliber Q - but shit, even raven fans could say that.
my betting mind says that -like bp said re: SD, they're a different team at home, though--they're just a different team in general. laws of probabilities alone lean this to a SD win, though coupled with key injuries to river's new fav targets: floyd and gates has this more a coinflip.
media here always too in love with brady -and belicheck for that matter, hard to find unbias views. a decent read/take on ravens game tells of how a singular change in secondary may have changed complexion in 2H: vs_ravens_take. Also, under the radar -Mesko, 5th round Punter for NE making waves...in, not making waves, here: zoltan_mesko which is exactly the way you want your kicker to be mentioned--not at all.

that said, my mild disdain for all things pats (because of the rose-colored glasses love they get) has me wanting to take SD this week, though- is crayton the answer? how bad are their special teams--as pats have taken theirs to be a truly "3rd of team" feel to it. tolbert and matthews should run.... and know rivers is cut above flacco... would love to get idea of what sd feelin... pats can be had, but is it asking to much from SD at this point (injuries, instability on def & sp teams?) hence, the question in imawinner's why_are_they_favored post
 
Last edited:

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
I agree..

I am hesitant posting a weekly Vikes thread because I am too much of a homer..

I can try to research and keep up with all the NFC North games.. Give me something to do during the slow days at work.

btw, i like your vikings posts and look forward to more of your views on all things viking and nfc and beyond. smart enough to not take you up on GB/CHI/MIN div bet this yr.

GB shoulda won two games now--L2 goin to OT (1-3 SU, 0-4 ATS L4 -which to me, 0-4 ATS is red flag), losin by FG's twice -once having crosby absolutely crush game winner (length wise) only to doink off upright - which opened door for hit that found rodgers sustaining concussion. heard a rumor atari bigby(who, to me was an absolute BEAST for them), secondary help for GB should be back, though their pass rush (GB) isnt the same. whole off (gb) looks shell of former self.

how are THEY favored? i know griffin out hurts, though even still minn def should be able to handle as good a one dimensional team as gb. no excuses here for offense of minn to not get on-track. can pride of home team carry it to win? can minn defense hide holes in secondary long enough to disrupt rodgers? peterson should carry day here with at least 2 scores...though childress...
 
Last edited:

Hooks

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 14, 2000
3,058
13
0
VEGAS
Chargers are 9 - 3 ats after a loss when favored.

Injuries are screwing things up.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,757
325
83
53
Belly of the Beast
its a deion branch love fest here. everyone already past whining about "how we gonna stretch the field w/o randy?" and basking in win over baltimore. not even hearing much about merriweather hit--though even i, a non-pats fan in boston, already have forgotten about -except to have reminded of in every sportscenter episode. people here happy with def vs rice and think flacco not a SB caliber Q - but shit, even raven fans could say that.
my betting mind says that -like bp said re: SD, they're a different team at home, though--they're just a different team in general. laws of probabilities alone lean this to a SD win, though coupled with key injuries to river's new fav targets: floyd and gates has this more a coinflip.
media here always too in love with brady -and belicheck for that matter, hard to find unbias views. a decent read/take on ravens game tells of how a singular change in secondary may have changed complexion in 2H: vs_ravens_take. Also, under the radar -Mesko, 5th round Punter for NE making waves...in, not making waves, here: zoltan_mesko which is exactly the way you want your kicker to be mentioned--not at all.

that said, my mild disdain for all things pats (because of the rose-colored glasses love they get) has me wanting to take SD this week, though- is crayton the answer? how bad are their special teams--as pats have taken theirs to be a truly "3rd of team" feel to it. tolbert and matthews should run.... and know rivers is cut above flacco... would love to get idea of what sd feelin... pats can be had, but is it asking to much from SD at this point (injuries, instability on def & sp teams?) hence, the question in imawinner's why_are_they_favored post

Thanks for your thoughts. My initial thoughts regardless of matchups is that there's got to be some value in any team that just lost to the Rams.

Even in Deon Branch's time in New England, he was one of many, so I just can't see how he's going to be the go to guy.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,416
242
63
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
LeRoy Butler was on the KFAN,(Vikings Flagship Station)..

He talked as thought the Vikes were the better team but picked the Pack to win 24 -17.. (Homer) He said that Green Bay has been working on scheme all week that the VIkings have never seen.. My thought is that it could cause the Pack some confusion on defense..

If Favre gets time to throw they win by 10 period..
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
Chargers are 9 - 3 ats after a loss when favored.

Injuries are screwing things up.

NE is 6-2 as non-div dog
NE 19-9-1 away after SU Win
SD 7-16-4 as HF of 3' or less

new kicker w/ kaeding out

both SD and NE failed to create a turnover in last game. Both BALT and STL didnt turn ball over once.
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
LeRoy Butler was on the KFAN,(Vikings Flagship Station)..

He talked as thought the Vikes were the better team but picked the Pack to win 24 -17.. (Homer) He said that Green Bay has been working on scheme all week that the VIkings have never seen.. My thought is that it could cause the Pack some confusion on defense..

If Favre gets time to throw they win by 10 period..
agree w/the time to throw deal--as w/matthews slowed, pass rush looks nono-existent. is this the game where GB plays up to potenial w/backups at soo manty positions -that could possibly be harder for MIN to prepare for (limited idea on tendencies from lack of film?)

so are ou saying GB is working on diff defensive scheme that in of itself could be confusing for their def to implement/follow?
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,416
242
63
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
agree w/the time to throw deal--as w/matthews slowed, pass rush looks nono-existent. is this the game where GB plays up to potenial w/backups at soo manty positions -that could possibly be harder for MIN to prepare for (limited idea on tendencies from lack of film?)

so are ou saying GB is working on diff defensive scheme that in of itself could be confusing for their def to implement/follow?

Well Butler made it sound as though it was intriquette.. GB has so many injuries and new schemes could mean blown assignments.. I really don't know what GB could do out of the 3 -4 that Favre hasn't seeen..Maybe Butler was just trying to stir up the Minneapolis listening area.:shrug:
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
THIS BOARD IS DEAD


??

considering it was a big day in college football, the forum will be focused sunday for the nfl.

what are you looking for?, maybe i can help.
 

King69

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 17, 2010
1,964
0
0
Too many posters looking to be hero's and chest pounding. Used to be people posted sides and any and all info they could find. Now people post info and they are called out for it if someone does not like what is said. Still a great place for a select few posters who continue to stick around IMO.:0008
 

BadAngel

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
20,153
1,635
113
Cleve. Ohio
tball, sometimes it is time thing for me. I am always on the move,grandkids bases,football and basketball games. Hardly ever home. I used to do write-ups when I first joined, (wow I have been here a long time) I had more time. I think it was you Sat that asked me why I liked Maryland yesterday because you liked Bos Coll. I gave you my reasons and I hope it helped. I wish I can do that for all the games, but sometimes it is a time thing. Plus I am a lousy typer.:mj07: I'll try to throw a couple of short reasons on my posts when I can.

GL tball

BA
 

fms27

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 13, 2008
366
0
0
Alabama
BA your hall of fame in my book:0074
I have been here a while and I have a select few that I look at their picks. But I play what I want to play. helps me because time is an issue for me too. BA - Raymond - Hammer- etc... I amquite sure they have done their research and have their reasons. If i have a big play for me that dont match their pick I "might" ask their reason but usually not because they are proven HANDY cappers.:0008
 

BadAngel

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
20,153
1,635
113
Cleve. Ohio
thanks fms27. I am glad to help. Also glad you look at my plays for your use. I am not right all the time because nobody is. The plan is to be right as much as possible. Thanks again for the compliment.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top