Top 6 things Republicans consider more important than job creation

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,304
1,480
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Hmm Why would you want to bring up Rebs and job creation Chad? What next--starting unprovoked wars :)

Wasn't but 2006 when you all and pelosi were screaming about jobs situation being worst since great depression--

Glad you all got in power-- and got things corrected :facepalm:

Sure would hate to go back and relive those terrible times :SIB

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/worst_job_records_since_the_great_depression/

Worst jobs record since the Great Depression?

Let?s analyze that a bit.
First, a run down of recent economic data:
  1. Unemployment down to 4.4%.
  2. 92,000 new jobs created in October.
  3. 470,000 new jobs over the last three months.
  4. Our economy has now added jobs for 38 straight months.
  5. Real, after-tax income has risen by 9.8% in the last six years. That?s $2,660, on average, that?s staying in the pocket of every single American rather than going to the government in taxes.

TRUE.


You Libs should listen to Dogs.

JMHO FWIW

:0074
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trampled Underfoot

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Funny - but if anyone suggests that Walker do the same thing in WI for the union bill, all you liberals get your panties in a bind.

I guess only when it best serves your interest, right?

Here is the difference and i hope a guy like u could understand this. Walkers bill helps a select few. The healthcare bill would have helped millions. I know how a guy like u would rather help two people instead of a couple of hundred, but most people don't.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
But in the three months since taking over the House and expanding their voices in the Senate, Republicans have yet to pass a jobs-focused bill, instead prioritizing numerous social and cultural issues that are unrelated to job creation -- and have little or no chance of becoming policy.

Here are six such legislative goals they've been hard at work on.

1) Curtailing Abortion Rights

2) Defunding Planned Parenthood

3) Defunding NPR

4) Investigating American Muslims

5) Declaring English As America's Official Language

6) Reaffirming The "In God We Trust" Motto
Right on queue, party lemmings Dawgs & Mags managed to completely miss the point of the article.

John Boehner and the Republicans campaigned on a promise to focus on JOBS, yet they've spent the past 3 months focusing on everything BUT jobs.

Of course, the rest of us recognize the irony of Republicans running on a jobs platform, because you actually have to give a shit about the middle-class in this country to care about jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Sponge

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
Right on queue, party lemmings Dawgs & Mags managed to completely miss the point of the article.

John Boehner and the Republicans campaigned on a promise to focus on JOBS, yet they've spent the past 3 months focusing on everything BUT jobs.

Of course, the rest of us recognize the irony of Republicans running on a jobs platform, because you actually have to give a shit about the middle-class in this country to care about jobs.

Sorry, Trench, but focusing on human life, even American, has some importance also.

1. Curtailing abortion rights. So, you must be part of this group that says its ok to create a baby, and it is ok to kill a baby. When is it ok to kill a baby in your mind? Right after conception? After 6 months? After 8 months? How about shooting it in the head right after birth? Which is the best? How do YOU define when the best is , and most appropriate, time is to kill a baby?

Oh yea - you believe in the woman's right to choose... well, she could choose not to have unprotected sex - and that would help prevent this.

But to kill people? If that is what you stand for, good for you. Heck, here in WI people get charged for murder for unborn babies - if there is an accident and a woman is pregnant - they get charged with murder of an unborn child. So, why are you ok with murdering the most DEFENSELESS of us all? You are all about stealing from those who work and give to those who don't, but yet you won't protect those who can't even fight back? You make me sick.

Same with PP - a significant part of their revenue comes from killing babies. They don't deserve goverment support - they should stand on their own.

NPR? They are not any different than Fox News - they have a viewpoint and they air it. If the government isn't gonna support Fox, they shouldn't NPR. They fired Juan Willlaims for God's sake - for being black and being honest.

I can't believe you really believe in killling babies. I'm just sick to my stomach - talk about preying on the defenseless.

Based on your logic, we should also just kill anyone over 65 too - since they are unwanted and a drain on society.

TRENCH - show me a baby and :bigun:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trench

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Seriously Mags, save your sanctimonious piety for the kind of gullible evangelicals who's politics are poisioned by religious dogma.

You know, guys like you.

The Republican Party - Where life begins at conception and ends at birth.
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
it is an interesting dichotomy....
liberals believe in abortion but are also against the death penalty.......
one could argue they are for killing babies and for protecting society's worst.

Personally, I would take the abortion issue off the FED's hands and give it to the States to decide.
Abortion ok in Illinois but not in Indiana? Move to Illinois. Don't like the laws in Indiana? Move to Illinois or vice-versa,

But this is for a different thread....sorry to derail - please continue the pro-union v anti-union debate in the Republicans have not acted on what they ran on thread.

Perhaps the Republicans have realized that Govt cannot create jobs and have decided to let the private sector run on it's own? Hmmm - that is giving Washington in general a lot of credit so probably not the answer.......
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
45,195
2,783
113
On the course!
Because even you libs know it has no place in the private sector. But you guys just love to stick it to the taxpayer, for the benefit of the 5% in WI that it unjustly benefits.

You mean like how badly guys like you want to strip away unions from the 95% of workers who don't abuse them, to punish the 5% who do?

Do you really think most workers are abusing the "system" like your pals have portrayed? Do you think most of us are incapable of actually bargaining like human beings? Get serious, for Christ's sake.

And if you think the state of Wisconsin is going to start paying it's employees based on their job performance, you really are out of your mind!

How many of your Federal workers are getting paid other than standardized wages? Ask the people in the planes over Washington DC a couple nights ago if they would have liked an extra person working in the tower, over the person catching a nap while planes landed themselves? That union has been screaming for an extra person up there for YEARS, but since they can't bargain for that........tough shit.

But, think how much more broke you would have been all these years, otherwise?

My bad.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Sorry, Trench, but focusing on human life, even American, has some importance also.

1. Curtailing abortion rights. So, you must be part of this group that says its ok to create a baby, and it is ok to kill a baby. When is it ok to kill a baby in your mind? Right after conception? After 6 months? After 8 months? How about shooting it in the head right after birth? Which is the best? How do YOU define when the best is , and most appropriate, time is to kill a baby?

Oh yea - you believe in the woman's right to choose... well, she could choose not to have unprotected sex - and that would help prevent this.

But to kill people? If that is what you stand for, good for you. Heck, here in WI people get charged for murder for unborn babies - if there is an accident and a woman is pregnant - they get charged with murder of an unborn child. So, why are you ok with murdering the most DEFENSELESS of us all? You are all about stealing from those who work and give to those who don't, but yet you won't protect those who can't even fight back? You make me sick.

Same with PP - a significant part of their revenue comes from killing babies. They don't deserve goverment support - they should stand on their own.

NPR? They are not any different than Fox News - they have a viewpoint and they air it. If the government isn't gonna support Fox, they shouldn't NPR. They fired Juan Willlaims for God's sake - for being black and being honest.

I can't believe you really believe in killling babies. I'm just sick to my stomach - talk about preying on the defenseless.

Based on your logic, we should also just kill anyone over 65 too - since they are unwanted and a drain on society.

TRENCH - show me a baby and :bigun:

You make me sick, maggie. Seriously there is no debating with mental midgets. It's just amazing how brain washed some people are. It's mind boggling. I bet you are a fan of Larry the Cable Guy. Just a hunch, maggie.
 

hammer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 17, 2002
7,791
127
63
Wisconsin and Dorado Puerto Rico
Top 6 things Republicans consider more important than job creation
By Sahil Kapur from Rawstory.com
March 22, 2011 @ 8:46 am

WASHINGTON ? Republicans won dramatic victories last November by promising to mitigate high unemployment. "This coming election is about one issue: jobs," to-be Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said [1] weeks before election day. "It's about jobs that were promised to the American people by the current administration, and were never delivered."

But in the three months since taking over the House and expanding their voices in the Senate, Republicans have yet to pass a jobs-focused bill, instead prioritizing numerous social and cultural issues that are unrelated to job creation -- and have little or no chance of becoming policy.

Here are six such legislative goals they've been hard at work on.

1) Curtailing Abortion Rights

A top priority for Republicans, H.R. 3, "The No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act" is on its way to passage [2] in the House after successfully maneuvering through the Judiciary [3] and Ways And Means Committees.

Though the GOP stripped out some of its most controversial provisions -- such as denying exemptions to a woman even in cases of rape, incest and when her life is in danger [4] -- the measure raises costs for businesses by eliminating tax deductions on employee health insurance plans that cover abortion.

2) Defunding Planned Parenthood

The House last month approved a measure [5] 240-185, sponsored by Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), to cut off all $317 million in Title X funding for Planned Parenthood and all other health care providers that offer abortions.

Under the law, Title X money cannot be used for abortion, so -- beyond the shot across Planned Parenthood's bow -- Republicans effectively voted to strip funding [6] enjoyed by mostly low-income women for medical services like cancer screenings, breast exams and HIV tests.

3) Defunding NPR

In the wake of James O'Keefe's highly edited video sting that defamed National Public Radio executives, House Republicans last week called an emergency session to push through legislation that eliminates taxpayer funds to the radio-based news agency. It passed 228-192 [7] on a partisan vote, winning over no Democrats and losing 7 Republicans.

4) Investigating American Muslims

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R-NY) held a controversial hearing two weeks ago about the extent of radicalization within the American Muslim community. Though even critics admitted [8] that the xenophobic undertones were relatively mild compared to what they expected, the hearings had their fair share of bizarre statements [9].

5) Declaring English As America's Official Language

Liberating Americans from ever needing to learn another language, Republicans this month introduced [10] the "English Language Unity Act," which would declare English as the official language of the U.S.

The bill declares that "all citizens should be able to read and understand generally the English language text of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the laws of the United States made in pursuance of the Constitution."

6) Reaffirming The "In God We Trust" Motto

The House Judiciary Committee last week approved a GOP resolution [11] reaffirming the motto of the United States as "In God We Trust" -- you know, just in case people forgot what America was all about.

Heard this on the ED Show the other day.......Been reading u {Chadman} for many years now and u are an eloquent voice for the side of sanity and reason. Used to participate in these discussions but its use less with the same audience. Prefer to ruffle feathers out in the public arena. Have u read or heard of Stockman's chronicle of the Republicans destruction of our Nation since that Crack Pot Reagan. Personally think he had Alzheimers from day 1 but guess it didn't really take effect till weeks later. The sub 100 IQ Republicans really have a gaggle of fools out there now....... Bush Boehner {NO Tears}............Palin Bachman Gingrich......ya follow his floppy Flip this month Rumney HuckleBerry Pukelenty and other sexually dysfunctional Evangelicals. If there is a God he had ta be out fer a cple a drinks when he threw together the DNA fer this mess
the right have stumbling around out there. Carry on sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trampled Underfoot

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
Sorry, Trench, but focusing on human life, even American, has some importance also.

1. Curtailing abortion rights. So, you must be part of this group that says its ok to create a baby, and it is ok to kill a baby. When is it ok to kill a baby in your mind? Right after conception? After 6 months? After 8 months? How about shooting it in the head right after birth? Which is the best? How do YOU define when the best is , and most appropriate, time is to kill a baby?

Oh yea - you believe in the woman's right to choose... well, she could choose not to have unprotected sex - and that would help prevent this.

But to kill people? If that is what you stand for, good for you. Heck, here in WI people get charged for murder for unborn babies - if there is an accident and a woman is pregnant - they get charged with murder of an unborn child. So, why are you ok with murdering the most DEFENSELESS of us all? You are all about stealing from those who work and give to those who don't, but yet you won't protect those who can't even fight back? You make me sick.

Same with PP - a significant part of their revenue comes from killing babies. They don't deserve goverment support - they should stand on their own.

NPR? They are not any different than Fox News - they have a viewpoint and they air it. If the government isn't gonna support Fox, they shouldn't NPR. They fired Juan Willlaims for God's sake - for being black and being honest.

I can't believe you really believe in killling babies. I'm just sick to my stomach - talk about preying on the defenseless.

Based on your logic, we should also just kill anyone over 65 too - since they are unwanted and a drain on society.

TRENCH - show me a baby and :bigun:

Strange how Chad writes this post saying what a waste of time it is to be campaigning about jobs but focusing on this nonsense instead and what do u do? U want to debate this nonsense and and waste more time. Did u miss the point of his post? Who gives a fuk about Abortion? I do. It is about 10000 on my list of things to do but u asshats fall for this shit over and over again like it should be one of the country's top priority's. :facepalm:
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
Strange how Chad writes this post saying what a waste of time it is to be campaigning about jobs but focusing on this nonsense instead and what do u do? U want to debate this nonsense and and waste more time. Did u miss the point of his post? Who gives a fuk about Abortion? I do. It is about 10000 on my list of things to do but u asshats fall for this shit over and over again like it should be one of the country's top priority's. :facepalm:

....and gay marriage. They use issues like this to round up their poor religious base that continues to vote against their financial interests to make sure that gays can't marry. :facepalm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: bleedingpurple

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I do find it interesting that only one person who has conservative leanings actually addressed the point of the post. Most spent time doing exactly what they criticize liberals and others who question right wing values for - blaming the party preceding them.

I know that most of those responding here know what the point of the post was and just chose to change the subject or move attention elsewhere, nothing new there.

It is nice to see Wayne finally changed his ongoing commentary about the worst "economy" since the great depression to worst "jobs creation" record since the great depression. Not that I want half the group to get off topic again, but I thought it worth mentioning. I guess that point was finally made previously.

The POINT is, republicans made the election about one thing ? IN THEIR OWN WORDS ? job creation. They [Boehner] said, "It's about jobs that were promised to the American people by the current administration, and were never delivered." And: Republicans won dramatic victories last November by promising to mitigate high unemployment.

What exactly do these statements have to do with democrats (other than blaming them)? Liberals? What have republicans done about it? What have they proposed? Anything coming from the House of Representatives on job creation - their main focus, supposedly? Any plans announced that they are going to do something? Maybe so - I'd love to see it. Now, if anyone cares to comment on these points, go for it. Or continue to change the subject, much like the people you supported in the past election, if that's easier... :popcorn2
 

Cie

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2003
22,391
253
0
New Orleans
Top 6 things Republicans consider more important than job creation
By Sahil Kapur from Rawstory.com
March 22, 2011 @ 8:46 am

WASHINGTON ? Republicans won dramatic victories last November by promising to mitigate high unemployment. "This coming election is about one issue: jobs," to-be Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said [1] weeks before election day. "It's about jobs that were promised to the American people by the current administration, and were never delivered."

But in the three months since taking over the House and expanding their voices in the Senate, Republicans have yet to pass a jobs-focused bill, instead prioritizing numerous social and cultural issues that are unrelated to job creation -- and have little or no chance of becoming policy.

Here are six such legislative goals they've been hard at work on.

1) Curtailing Abortion Rights

A top priority for Republicans, H.R. 3, "The No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act" is on its way to passage [2] in the House after successfully maneuvering through the Judiciary [3] and Ways And Means Committees.

Though the GOP stripped out some of its most controversial provisions -- such as denying exemptions to a woman even in cases of rape, incest and when her life is in danger [4] -- the measure raises costs for businesses by eliminating tax deductions on employee health insurance plans that cover abortion.

2) Defunding Planned Parenthood

The House last month approved a measure [5] 240-185, sponsored by Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), to cut off all $317 million in Title X funding for Planned Parenthood and all other health care providers that offer abortions.

Under the law, Title X money cannot be used for abortion, so -- beyond the shot across Planned Parenthood's bow -- Republicans effectively voted to strip funding [6] enjoyed by mostly low-income women for medical services like cancer screenings, breast exams and HIV tests.

3) Defunding NPR

In the wake of James O'Keefe's highly edited video sting that defamed National Public Radio executives, House Republicans last week called an emergency session to push through legislation that eliminates taxpayer funds to the radio-based news agency. It passed 228-192 [7] on a partisan vote, winning over no Democrats and losing 7 Republicans.

4) Investigating American Muslims

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R-NY) held a controversial hearing two weeks ago about the extent of radicalization within the American Muslim community. Though even critics admitted [8] that the xenophobic undertones were relatively mild compared to what they expected, the hearings had their fair share of bizarre statements [9].

5) Declaring English As America's Official Language

Liberating Americans from ever needing to learn another language, Republicans this month introduced [10] the "English Language Unity Act," which would declare English as the official language of the U.S.

The bill declares that "all citizens should be able to read and understand generally the English language text of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the laws of the United States made in pursuance of the Constitution."

6) Reaffirming The "In God We Trust" Motto

The House Judiciary Committee last week approved a GOP resolution [11] reaffirming the motto of the United States as "In God We Trust" -- you know, just in case people forgot what America was all about.

While I am glad NPR has been stripped of funding, and certainly do not want a single tax dollar to be sptent on abortions, this is the kind of stuff that annoys me til no end. Our focus needs to be elsewhere right now.

That said, anyone surprised that a politico ran on a platform and abandoned it, need to wake up and quit voting in assholes, Obama included. If we truly want change, then let's vote outside of the 2 major parties.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
it is an interesting dichotomy....
liberals believe in abortion but are also against the death penalty.......
one could argue they are for killing babies and for protecting society's worst.
Being pro-choice does not mean someone is pro-abortion. Secondly, not all liberals are against the death penalty. I for one, am not.

If you want to play this game, I could just as easily make the argument that right-wingers are for killing women, children and minorities but are for protecting the rights of some of society's worst -- gun loons and gang-bangers with assault weapons.

:shrug: :0corn
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
While I am glad NPR has been stripped of funding,
Me too. I'm so tired of hearing right-wingers piss and moan about the millions spent on public broadcasting while they say nothing about the trillions spent on the war machine.

Now, if we can just do away with funding for some other acronyms Republicans like to whine about: NASA, OSHA, the SEC, the FAA, the FCC, the EPA...
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,543
230
63
Bowling Green Ky
Me too. I'm so tired of hearing right-wingers piss and moan about the millions spent on public broadcasting while they say nothing about the trillions spent on the war machine.

Now, if we can just do away with funding for some other acronyms Republicans like to whine about: NASA, OSHA, the SEC, the FAA, the FCC, the EPA...

Is this liberal comedy hour :facepalm:

We go from dissing rebs on job creation to unprovoked wars--in current environment

Did anyone ever tell ya all that timing has a lot to do with presentation of humor :)
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
Trench:
Blanket generalization on my part and I apologize. Should not do that but I guess I got swept up in at as it is common to do in this forum.
I do not understand your point on 'right-wingers wanting to kill women and children and minorities' or however you worded it.
I have been labeled a conservative in this forum though I am a libertarian. I am pro-choice - who the hell am I to tell a woman what she can or can not do to her body? If I was in the situation, I would have the child as I believe life begins at conception but I have no right to tell anyone else how they should act - that is a discussion that they will need to have with whatever god / supreme force they believe in (or not) when the time comes.

As for assault weapon bans, etc - the point to me is laughable. Criminals will get the weapons REGARDLESS of the laws on the books - very similar to the war on drugs and all the laws in place to prevent that - criminals still get the guns and the drugs. Having the general populace with those weapons does not really bother me AS LONG AS THERE IS TRAINING INVOLVED. I think a lot is made of it by the media for the shock and awe factor. Gun loons? Again - I would say you are using a blanket generalization. I own guns, am properly trained in the handling of the weapons that I own and the people that I know who also own guns are extremely knowledgeable as to their function and operation and I would not calll them in any way 'loons'. In any cross-section of a population, you will have people falling within the norm and people outside the norm - I am sure that there are 'loons' who own guns but owning a gun does not make you a 'loon'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chadman

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Is this liberal comedy hour :facepalm:

We go from dissing rebs on job creation to unprovoked wars--in current environment

Did anyone ever tell ya all that timing has a lot to do with presentation of humor :)
Dawgs, lemme give you an example of satirical humor.

Let's take our friend Mags, for instance. What I like about Mags is, at least he tries to make an argument. Granted, his arguments are weak, deluded and rarely relevant to the topic, but at least he's making an argument. Mags, don't take my comments the wrong way. It's sorta like when Mrs. Mags tells you she likes having sex with you because you're fast and she hardly feels a thing.
:rimshot

I'm here all week. Try the veal. :0008
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Trench:
Blanket generalization on my part and I apologize. Should not do that but I guess I got swept up in at as it is common to do in this forum.
I do not understand your point on 'right-wingers wanting to kill women and children and minorities' or however you worded it.
I have been labeled a conservative in this forum though I am a libertarian. I am pro-choice - who the hell am I to tell a woman what she can or can not do to her body? If I was in the situation, I would have the child as I believe life begins at conception but I have no right to tell anyone else how they should act - that is a discussion that they will need to have with whatever god / supreme force they believe in (or not) when the time comes.

As for assault weapon bans, etc - the point to me is laughable. Criminals will get the weapons REGARDLESS of the laws on the books - very similar to the war on drugs and all the laws in place to prevent that - criminals still get the guns and the drugs. Having the general populace with those weapons does not really bother me AS LONG AS THERE IS TRAINING INVOLVED. I think a lot is made of it by the media for the shock and awe factor. Gun loons? Again - I would say you are using a blanket generalization. I own guns, am properly trained in the handling of the weapons that I own and the people that I know who also own guns are extremely knowledgeable as to their function and operation and I would not calll them in any way 'loons'. In any cross-section of a population, you will have people falling within the norm and people outside the norm - I am sure that there are 'loons' who own guns but owning a gun does not make you a 'loon'.
I thought those comments were out of character for you, SSD, so thanks for the response. My counter-point was just as silly and that was the point I was trying to make.

For the record, I own several guns so I certainly don't consider all gun owners "gun loons". But there are gun loons among us. The problem is mental illness and assault weapons don't mix. We can't fix the mental illness problem because too many of the mentally ill are undiagnosed or are without the means to get treatment. We CAN fix the assault weapon problem though.

Sorry, it wasn't my intention to turn this thread into another 2nd Amendment debate. :0008
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
I thought those comments were out of character for you, SSD, so thanks for the response. My counter-point was just as silly and that was the point I was trying to make.

For the record, I own several guns so I certainly don't consider all gun owners "gun loons". But there are gun loons among us. The problem is mental illness and assault weapons don't mix. We can't fix the mental illness problem because too many of the mentally ill are undiagnosed or are without the means to get treatment. We CAN fix the assault weapon problem though.

Sorry, it wasn't my intention to turn this thread into another 2nd Amendment debate. :0008

Yeah,

Leave the "Gun Lumicy" to me,

right Trench ? :toast: :0008

Although... TF himself enjoys the kick of a shotgun against his shoulder as well. :)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top