Tue$ plicks - Philly
- Thread starter Jimboski
- Start date
Gotta LUV these dirt bombs
Gotta LUV these dirt bombs
TELL ME ya got it, Hammy, Hog, ROBOTS??
I did .. WOW!
zackta (One stinkin dollars worth) that is.. and I had the trifecta nos. starring me in the face on my notebook too. Phooey.
GREAT week with these Philly dirt bombs, nailed BOTH the exacta (think it was $84 (2 dollars worth of them Lucky nos.) AND the tri ($331, one stinken dollars worth). That was Sunday's last race.
I know H & H will look up the prices and I HOPE at least one of them did GIT DAT CASH
..
Now, that's what I'm talkin about
Gotta LUV these dirt bombs
TELL ME ya got it, Hammy, Hog, ROBOTS??
I did .. WOW!
zackta (One stinkin dollars worth) that is.. and I had the trifecta nos. starring me in the face on my notebook too. Phooey.
GREAT week with these Philly dirt bombs, nailed BOTH the exacta (think it was $84 (2 dollars worth of them Lucky nos.) AND the tri ($331, one stinken dollars worth). That was Sunday's last race.
I know H & H will look up the prices and I HOPE at least one of them did GIT DAT CASH
.. Now, that's what I'm talkin about
:spotting: Wish I could tell ya that I had the exacta but I did have WPS which is alright by me. Thanks again for your astute visuals.
6 :0034 The LOOKER musta made you drool.
Hammy
6 :0034 The LOOKER musta made you drool.
Hammy
Sorry about resurrecting this thing but I'm sure some VIEWERS are wondering how the hell I came up with this score. Really something...
We originally had 3-7-8-10 as "potential wieners" written down.
Now, that "TERRIBLE" comment meant -> NOW, with the L@@KERS, we gots 1,3,6,7,8,10 SHEET!
Can't play them all, so I went over the contenders - No. 3 is one that I really personally liked best, picked the right one to throw out among the "LOOKERS" (no.1), no. 8 was actually my top RATED hoss. I was trying to figure out how to make my usual "a,b top/bot c,d" thingy and I see them heading to the starting gate. Wrote, "narrow it down to 3,8,6,10". I just rushed like hell and merely filled in spaces, that is 3,8 top/bot 6,10 and . . VIOLA - a $552 zackta.
I had no idea that no. 6 was 30+ to 1 shot.
Hammy, catching a WIENER like that is still a very nice hit as well.
Gotta post my college FOOTSballers now. See yas on Tue$, I guess.
We originally had 3-7-8-10 as "potential wieners" written down.
Now, that "TERRIBLE" comment meant -> NOW, with the L@@KERS, we gots 1,3,6,7,8,10 SHEET!
Can't play them all, so I went over the contenders - No. 3 is one that I really personally liked best, picked the right one to throw out among the "LOOKERS" (no.1), no. 8 was actually my top RATED hoss. I was trying to figure out how to make my usual "a,b top/bot c,d" thingy and I see them heading to the starting gate. Wrote, "narrow it down to 3,8,6,10". I just rushed like hell and merely filled in spaces, that is 3,8 top/bot 6,10 and . . VIOLA - a $552 zackta.
I had no idea that no. 6 was 30+ to 1 shot.
Hammy, catching a WIENER like that is still a very nice hit as well.
Gotta post my college FOOTSballers now. See yas on Tue$, I guess.
Sorry about resurrecting this thing but I'm sure some VIEWERS are wondering how the hell I came up with this score. Really something...
We originally had 3-7-8-10 as "potential wieners" written down.
Now, that "TERRIBLE" comment meant -> NOW, with the L@@KERS, we gots 1,3,6,7,8,10 SHEET! :facepalm:
Can't play them all, so I went over the contenders - No. 3 is one that I really personally liked best, picked the right one to throw out among the "LOOKERS" (no.1), no. 8 was actually my top RATED hoss. I was trying to figure out how to make my usual "a,b top/bot c,d" thingy and I see them heading to the starting gate. Wrote, "narrow it down to 3,8,6,10". I just rushed like hell and merely filled in spaces, that is 3,8 top/bot 6,10 and . . VIOLA - a $552 zackta.
I had no idea that no. 6 was 30+ to 1 shot.
Hammy, catching a WIENER like that is still a very nice hit as well. :00x15
Gotta post my college FOOTSballers now. See yas on Tue$, I guess.
We originally had 3-7-8-10 as "potential wieners" written down.
Now, that "TERRIBLE" comment meant -> NOW, with the L@@KERS, we gots 1,3,6,7,8,10 SHEET! :facepalm:
Can't play them all, so I went over the contenders - No. 3 is one that I really personally liked best, picked the right one to throw out among the "LOOKERS" (no.1), no. 8 was actually my top RATED hoss. I was trying to figure out how to make my usual "a,b top/bot c,d" thingy and I see them heading to the starting gate. Wrote, "narrow it down to 3,8,6,10". I just rushed like hell and merely filled in spaces, that is 3,8 top/bot 6,10 and . . VIOLA - a $552 zackta.
I had no idea that no. 6 was 30+ to 1 shot.
Hammy, catching a WIENER like that is still a very nice hit as well. :00x15
Gotta post my college FOOTSballers now. See yas on Tue$, I guess.
