gecko said:kosar -
Then you can understand why Scott and other USC fans felt wronged about not playing in the championship game.
Yes, the BCS is reality right now. A bunch of powerful conferences concerned with only how they and their teams do in the postseason. That's why they love the BCS bowl system -- a bunch of second and third-tier bowls and four (soon to be five) larger revenue-generating bowls.
Taking into context your back-to-back posts on this page, you flatly deny USC the co-championship in 2003 which even the BCS apparently recognizes. This shared title is NOT a media creation (which you and others seem to believe), otherwise the BCS wouldn't even touch it. USC deserved the split title because it did finish #1 in the AP poll, which the BCS recognized. This even though LSU won the BCS title game. The fact is, like it or not, the so-called "BCS system" of crowning ONE champ did not work that year, as was originally intended....and that is why USC and LSU are co-champions.
I agree with most everything you have said gecko, and you have added more facts and support for SC than scott has all season. But i hate the use of symantecs. Saying LSU won "the title game" is stepping around the fact that LSU won the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME. even though you mean the same thing, you cannot say the same thing about USC.
Yeah BCS didnt work that year, and Scott reminds us of his pain and longing in every post with his signature. But I dont see why LSU has to split the title of National Champions when USC didnt play in the National Championship game! I mean there were other bowls that year too, but only 1 NC bowl.
Either way U guys know where I stand on the issue, SC had a very good but overhyped run and who cares they will suck next year and then no one will be talking about them but Scott so why dont we just drop the subject and move onto next season and who will be winning bets 4 us next season