I get that you guys are pissed, but what about Duke bettors? That kid was hacked TWICE with three seconds to go, and the refs swallowed the whistle because it was "game over". If you guys had Duke, and no whistle was blown, you'd have started a thread about that! The only thing is......in that case, you'd be right.
The kid was hacked, and two foul shots should have been granted. You know it, and I know it. Your wagers are the only thing making you say otherwise.
First - The third foul on Delon Wright in the first half was horse shit. It was a clear jump ball and that changed the game.
Second - At the end of the game they usually just say it is over. The TV even shows Coach K tell the refs it was over. To make it such a point to bring players back from the locker room to shoot the free throw is asinine. It was blatant. And if you can't see the point people are making then you just don't get it. It's not about whether it was a foul or not. It's about the game being over and pulling players back to shoot a meaningless free throw. The only people who cared about that free throw is the gambling industry.
The 3 refs knew exactly what they were doing in both instances. And if you notice, it was the exact same guy. For God's sake, there is a ref in jail for shit like this and yet we pretend it doesn't happen. It's just usually not so obvious. And for those posters to pretend like it didn't happen, I have some land I want to sell you.
This shit is fixed as fuck. Everyone knows the fucking spread. There was no reason to call a foul there other than for Duke to cover.
certainly not proclaiming a definite fix but to totally discard any and all situations like this one as coincidental is extremely naive
I get that you guys are pissed, but what about Duke bettors? That kid was hacked TWICE with three seconds to go, and the refs swallowed the whistle because it was "game over". If you guys had Duke, and no whistle was blown, you'd have started a thread about that! The only thing is......in that case, you'd be right.
The kid was hacked, and two foul shots should have been granted. You know it, and I know it. Your wagers are the only thing making you say otherwise.
YYZ you are dead wrong! :nono:
Except the house lost very big on this one.
and earlier.. with 1 minute left and down by 10... fucking UCLA takes al starters out.. non try for fouling, not even a fucking shot by the subs.. why? cause I would have hit na teaser by .5 and 1 shot made and UCLA covers...
Third foul had no bearing on the game. Wright played all of the second half playing 33 minutes which is his average playing time.third foul would not have happened if Utah over the back call would have been called as Winslow went for rebound. Second foul on Okafor was a bad call changing how he played to keep from getting his third foul. Both side had fouls go against them.
Corley?u still on here whining like a little bitch about fixed games...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
