UTAH +5 thanks refs you couldnt just let game be over

Lucy

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 26, 2013
515
9
18
N. GA
I had under 70 2nd half that free throw made 71. But I'm not calling conspiracy. Book got my money get it back tomorrow. I hope. If not fuck it we lost.
 

ejthree

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2006
5,000
707
113
I get that you guys are pissed, but what about Duke bettors? That kid was hacked TWICE with three seconds to go, and the refs swallowed the whistle because it was "game over". If you guys had Duke, and no whistle was blown, you'd have started a thread about that! The only thing is......in that case, you'd be right.


The kid was hacked, and two foul shots should have been granted. You know it, and I know it. Your wagers are the only thing making you say otherwise.


THIS !!!!!
 

Grama

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
2,704
22
0
Lynchburg, VA
First - The third foul on Delon Wright in the first half was horse shit. It was a clear jump ball and that changed the game.
Second - At the end of the game they usually just say it is over. The TV even shows Coach K tell the refs it was over. To make it such a point to bring players back from the locker room to shoot the free throw is asinine. It was blatant. And if you can't see the point people are making then you just don't get it. It's not about whether it was a foul or not. It's about the game being over and pulling players back to shoot a meaningless free throw. The only people who cared about that free throw is the gambling industry.

The 3 refs knew exactly what they were doing in both instances. And if you notice, it was the exact same guy. For God's sake, there is a ref in jail for shit like this and yet we pretend it doesn't happen. It's just usually not so obvious. And for those posters to pretend like it didn't happen, I have some land I want to sell you.
 

lowell

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2003
9,177
89
48
First - The third foul on Delon Wright in the first half was horse shit. It was a clear jump ball and that changed the game.
Second - At the end of the game they usually just say it is over. The TV even shows Coach K tell the refs it was over. To make it such a point to bring players back from the locker room to shoot the free throw is asinine. It was blatant. And if you can't see the point people are making then you just don't get it. It's not about whether it was a foul or not. It's about the game being over and pulling players back to shoot a meaningless free throw. The only people who cared about that free throw is the gambling industry.

The 3 refs knew exactly what they were doing in both instances. And if you notice, it was the exact same guy. For God's sake, there is a ref in jail for shit like this and yet we pretend it doesn't happen. It's just usually not so obvious. And for those posters to pretend like it didn't happen, I have some land I want to sell you.

Third foul had no bearing on the game. Wright played all of the second half playing 33 minutes which is his average playing time.third foul would not have happened if Utah over the back call would have been called as Winslow went for rebound. Second foul on Okafor was a bad call changing how he played to keep from getting his third foul. Both side had fouls go against them.
 

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
hard to believe that some are so naive to think that there was no possibility of shady activity at the end of this game - wake up ppl, this kind of shit happens

had no action on the game but come on, reviewing tape to determine whether or not a foul occurred at the end of a 5 point game? really?
 

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
certainly not proclaiming a definite fix but to totally discard any and all situations like this one as coincidental is extremely naive
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,844
2,122
113
70
home
certainly not proclaiming a definite fix but to totally discard any and all situations like this one as coincidental is extremely naive

Except the house lost very big on this one.
 

poolplayer8888

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,207
20
0
I get that you guys are pissed, but what about Duke bettors? That kid was hacked TWICE with three seconds to go, and the refs swallowed the whistle because it was "game over". If you guys had Duke, and no whistle was blown, you'd have started a thread about that! The only thing is......in that case, you'd be right.


The kid was hacked, and two foul shots should have been granted. You know it, and I know it. Your wagers are the only thing making you say otherwise.

agree totally...
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,912
2,482
113
On the course!
YYZ you are dead wrong! :nono:


What am I wrong on?


He rebounded that ball with TEN SECONDS left! Could they have blown a whistle for a "jump ball"? Maybe. But there is NO DOUBT they missed TWO chances to call fouls before they finally did! I am not WRONG!


Now, forget your precious fucking spread. Is it fair for the refs to eat their whistles because, in their minds.....the "game is over"? Every single one of us, including you, has watched more games than we care to remember, where a team keeps fouling when they are down by 15 points!

These guys were down by FIVE! If you want to have a conspiracy on this, perhaps it was the guy who finally blew the whistle who didn't get the memo? After all, bookies the world over lost their asses when that last free throw went in!
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,192
132
63
berlin md
and earlier.. with 1 minute left and down by 10... fucking UCLA takes al starters out.. non try for fouling, not even a fucking shot by the subs.. why? cause I would have hit na teaser by .5 and 1 shot made and UCLA covers...

:mj07:

WTF does that have to do with the end of the Utah game?

Are you really bitching about that being a bad beat?
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,192
132
63
berlin md
Third foul had no bearing on the game. Wright played all of the second half playing 33 minutes which is his average playing time.third foul would not have happened if Utah over the back call would have been called as Winslow went for rebound. Second foul on Okafor was a bad call changing how he played to keep from getting his third foul. Both side had fouls go against them.

bullshit.

It was 19-17 Duke when Wright got called for that nonsense foul, the score went to 27-17 with him on bench. He played different in second half seemed tentative. Kid averaged 1.6 fouls per 40 minutes. that third foul totally changed the game.
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,062
51
48
Well everyone knows that when you play Duke you play the refs as well, so if you aren't betting with Duke why would you bet this game?That is my ? nothing new about this.Duke and the officials take care of their backers.
 

heleanth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 17, 2001
3,740
58
48
Northern Wisconsin
No matter which side you had in this game, you have a legitimate bitch. However, no one forces you to bet one side or the other. You just have to hope you are on the right side of the fix.:shrug::0corn
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top