looks like the line makers did there job by getting equal money on both teams...but that still remains to be seen...all we can do is watch how the line moves...personally I believe there will more money on Pitt but I could be wrongbjfinste said:Looks like MJ's is quite split (63-59 at the moment). I likely won't wager unless I decide to fund an account at the last minute. But if I did, I would probably split my bet between taking the points and Seattle ML.
USCMD said:teaser with Pit +3.5 and under 54.
Killian said:I've come to the conclusion that Seattle is the right side in this game. They are rested.....road to the SB has been an easy one. Beat Washington after putting the ball on the ground five times and losing the league MVP on the second series. Took Carolina apart like a tinker toy.....and Pittsburgh is next. This Pittsburgh team is good and I applaude them on getting this far but they haven't faced a team like this one all year. Seattle is well balanced and the defense is very under rated.......over 50 sacks for the year counting the playoffs. The "red zone" D has been outstanding, they are #4 in the league while the Steelers rank #10 with fewer sacks than Seattle. I just think that Seattle will come to play and they arriving on Sunday .....one week b4 the SB. Holmgren will keep them focused on the task at hand.
Give me the Hawks and the points please.
Thats the reason why I don't even bother playing my favoirte teams...I don't even play the totals because it has been nothing but bad luck for meamich1 said:Could never bet against "my" team in the sb b/c I could just never root for another team (I would play he total or pass if I couldn't pull the trigger on my team.)
USCMD said:I looked over the numbers and came to the conclusion that Pit is the side to take. But the cappers I respect seem to be mostly of the opinion that Sea +, taking the points is the way to go. I'm thinking I'll probably play Pit ml, and maybe a taboo (crossing zero) teaser with Pit +3.5 and under 54.
Sea away from the noisemakers is 3-4-1 ats. Pit, playing a much tougher sched is 9-2 ats away. Pit has been in win or die for 6 weeks....and showed a boatload of character in beating 1, 2 and 3 seeds on the road.
If you like Sea......please tell me why. You might save me lots of money.
Phenom said:I spent the last couple of hours going over stats for both teams, and putting them in a spreadsheet,, what I noticed is that Seattle has almost a 2 to 1 advantage in number of categories in their favor (I am up to 25 now), Defense and Offense...
Add to the fact that I am seeing numbers rising to almost 65% on the Steelers in some places.
I realize that these numbers don't always decide games, I just really can't see how Seattle is getting 4 points.
The more I work on it, the more I want the the abundance of Steelers fans to keep the line moving up.. There is not a town that I have been in that doesn't have a Steeler Bar, including Maui, Hawaii...
Give me the points, although I will wait to see if I can get 4.5 or 5...
Nice Run Clem, interested to see your take on the game...
thom24ad said:As a Seahawks fan you have come to the conclusion that Seattle wins...I don't mean to criticize but your opinion could be construed as biased but other wise you make some good points
Its all about the almight dollar...and I can't even tell you how many times I've been burned betting for, against, or even on the totals when my favorite team is involved in the play...Its unbelievable how many times I've lost...Either way I guess its a win/loss situation for you...Pitt wins you cash in but your favorite teams loss the SB...Seattle wins your happy because your team wins but you still loss money...I hate being in that situation and with my luck and if I were in your situation...Pitt would win but wouldn't cover either...I hope your luck is better then mine Killian and good luck to you!Killian said:I stopped betting with my heart years ago.
AR182 said:some books have gone to 4.5....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.