I just don't get it. Some folks (not all) say that being gay is ok, even if God didn't really give men the mechanism (and corresponding anitomical parts) to have sex and procreate. But I get it - some people are born that way and that is just the way it is. No problem with that.
But why is Jeff's situation different? I don't see much difference in poligamy than same sex relationships. They are both considered bad by the Bible and religious folks. But at least men were designed to have sex with women - their "parts" match.
I know marriage is defined as "one man and one woman". So in addition to the variants of "one man and one man" and "one woman and one woman" why can't there also be "one man and multiple women" and "multiple men and one woman"????
Seriously, it seems like Christians could understand poligamy more than gayness? Why isn't there a movement to allow poligamy?
Isn't this just discrimination?
But why is Jeff's situation different? I don't see much difference in poligamy than same sex relationships. They are both considered bad by the Bible and religious folks. But at least men were designed to have sex with women - their "parts" match.
I know marriage is defined as "one man and one woman". So in addition to the variants of "one man and one man" and "one woman and one woman" why can't there also be "one man and multiple women" and "multiple men and one woman"????
Seriously, it seems like Christians could understand poligamy more than gayness? Why isn't there a movement to allow poligamy?
Isn't this just discrimination?

