Why We Treat Obama Like A Dog

Tcas

Registered User
Forum Member
May 8, 2008
1,266
27
0
FL
Obama certainly has it ruff these days. With his approval ratings plummeting and both the House and the Senate trending Republican, he must feel like he's been put in the doghouse. Even members of his own party are attacking him; Chris Matthews, his designated chew toy, has even come out against the beloved teleprompter. In short, nobody seems willing to throw Obama a bone.

Which is why this week, Obama, while pumping his rehashed and tiresome economic agenda -- an agenda that apparently consists of yelling "stimulus!" repeatedly, then throwing cash in the air and smiling -- he intoned, "Some powerful interests who had been dominating the agenda in Washington for a very long time and they're not always happy with me. They talk about me like a dog. That's not in my prepared remarks, but it's true."

Actually, it's not true. The only person who has ever likened Obama to a dog is Obama, who once declared that he was a "mutt" and a member of a "mongrel people." Obama's language brings to mind uncomfortable comparisons with Old Yeller, who was "an ugly, lop-eared mongrel, fancy free without a family tree." The comparison is uncomfortable because Obama is not, in fact, the best doggone dog in the West. He is the worst doggone dog in the East, accepting the mantle from the late Marley.

In reality, there's a reason nobody has compared Obama to a dog: dogs are likeable. They are friendly and loyal. They are man's best friend, as opposed to King Abdullah's best friend.

But let's take Obama at his word. If we're treating Obama "like a dog" -- and let's assume he means "Stone Free" Jimi Hendrix-style -- it's because he deserves it. If Obama were a dog, he'd be a bad dog. The kind of dog that routinely drinks from the toilet, and simply will not be taught that drinking from the toilet is bad manners (think Obama on health care). The kind of dog that barks at all hours of the night, just for attention (think Obama's pathetic need for constant adulation). The kind of dog that runs from intruders when danger's in the air (think Obama on Iraq, Iran, Russia, North Korea, China -- hell, just think about Obama's position on any country that isn't an American ally). The kind of dog that chews on the furniture out of pure spite (if Obama's actually going to chew on the furniture, by the way, let me be the first to suggest he start with the new, hideous Oval Office accoutrements).

If Obama's a dog, he's a puppy that has never been housebroken, whose owner continually babies it and never requires basic standards of behavior. Obama has never had to make a living; he has never had to face the consequences of his behavior, whether that behavior is hanging out with terrorists, doing cocaine, or attending a racist church for 20 years. He's never been held accountable. Finally, he's being held accountable. He doesn't like it, so he's rhetorically urinating in the middle of the living room.

Obama, like a bad puppy, acts badly because he doesn't recognize that he's not in the true position of authority. The American people stand above him. He is a public servant, a servant of our will. He seems not to believe that -- in fact, he thinks that America's the dog, he's the master, and he can simply order Americans to agree with him. He's utterly disconnected from reality.

In short, Obama has to learn to obey the American public. If not, we'll continue to treat him like a bad dog. Only worse, since he refuses to learn. And in November, he'll find out that bad dogs don't get any electoral Scooby treats.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
yeh so what

He is still President and may even get re-elected in 2012

When the neocons run out Sarah Palin and Newt

wtf
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
Fidel to Ahmadinejad: 'Stop Slandering the Jews'
Sep 7 2010, 12:06 PM ET

(This is Part I of a report on my recent visit to Havana. I hope to post Part II tomorrow. And I also hope to be publishing a more comprehensive article about this subject in a forthcoming print edition of The Atlantic.)

A couple of weeks ago, while I was on vacation, my cell phone rang; it was Jorge Bolanos, the head of the Cuban Interest Section (we of course don't have diplomatic relations with Cuba) in Washington. "I have a message for you from Fidel," he said. This made me sit up straight. "He has read your Atlantic article about Iran and Israel. He invites you to Havana on Sunday to discuss the article." I am always eager, of course, to interact with readers of The Atlantic, so I called a friend at the Council on Foreign Relations, Julia Sweig, who is a preeminent expert on Cuba and Latin America: "Road trip," I said.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MORE ON Fidel Castro:
Jeffrey Goldberg: Castro: "The Cuban model doesn't even work for us anymore."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I quickly departed the People's Republic of Martha's Vineyard for Fidel's more tropical socialist island paradise. Despite the self-defeating American ban on travel to Cuba, both Julia and I, as journalists and researchers, qualified for a State Department exemption. The charter flight from Miami was bursting with Cuban-Americans carrying flat-screen televisions and computers for their technologically-bereft families. Fifty minutes after take-off, we arrived at the mostly-empty Jose Marti International Airport. Fidel's people met us on the tarmac (despite giving up his formal role as commandante en jefe after falling ill several years ago, Fidel still has many people). We were soon deposited at a "protocol house" in a government compound whose architecture reminded me of the gated communities of Boca Raton. The only other guest in this vast enclosure was the president of Guinea-Bissau.

I was aware that Castro had become preoccupied with the threat of a military confrontation in the Middle East between Iran and the U.S. (and Israel, the country he calls its Middle East "gendarme"). Since emerging from his medically induced, four-year purdah early this summer (various gastrointestinal maladies had combined to nearly kill him), the 84-year-old Castro has spoken mainly about the catastrophic threat of what he sees as an inevitable war.

I was curious to know why he saw conflict as unavoidable, and I wondered, of course, if personal experience - the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 that nearly caused the annihilation of most of humanity - informed his belief that a conflict between America and Iran would escalate into nuclear war. I was even more curious, however, to get a glimpse of the great man. Few people had seen him since he fell ill in 2006, and the state of his health has been a subject of much speculation. There were questions, too, about the role he plays now in governing Cuba; he formally handed off power to his younger brother, Raul, two years ago, but it was not clear how many strings Fidel still pulled.

The morning after our arrival in Havana, Julia and I were driven to a nearby convention center, and escorted upstairs, to a large and spare office. A frail and aged Fidel stood to greet us. He was wearing a red shirt, sweatpants, and black New Balance sneakers. The room was crowded with officials and family: His wife, Dalia, and son Antonio, as well as an Interior Ministry general, a translator, a doctor and several bodyguards, all of whom appeared to have been recruited from the Cuban national wrestling team. Two of these bodyguards held Castro at the elbow.

We shook hands, and he greeted Julia warmly; they have known each other for more than twenty years. Fidel lowered himself gently into his seat, and we began a conversation that would continue, in fits and starts, for three days. His body may be frail, but his mind is acute, his energy level is high, and not only that: the late-stage Fidel Castro turns out to possess something of a self-deprecating sense of humor. When I asked him, over lunch, to answer what I've come to think of as the Christopher Hitchens question - has your illness caused you to change your mind about the existence of God? - he answered, "Sorry, I'm still a dialectical materialist." (This is funnier if you are, like me, an ex-self-defined socialist.) At another point, he showed us a series of recent photographs taken of him, one of which portrayed him with a fierce expression. "This was how my face looked when I was angry with Khruschev," he said.

Castro opened our initial meeting by telling me that he read the recent Atlantic article carefully, and that it confirmed his view that Israel and America were moving precipitously and gratuitously toward confrontation with Iran. This interpretation was not surprising, of course: Castro is the grandfather of global anti-Americanism, and he has been a severe critic of Israel. His message to Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, he said, was simple: Israel will only have security if it gives up its nuclear arsenal, and the rest of the world's nuclear powers will only have security if they, too, give up their weapons. Global and simultaneous nuclear disarmament is, of course, a worthy goal, but it is not, in the short term, realistic.

Castro's message to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of Iran, was not so abstract, however. Over the course of this first, five-hour discussion, Castro repeatedly returned to his excoriation of anti-Semitism. He criticized Ahmadinejad for denying the Holocaust and explained why the Iranian government would better serve the cause of peace by acknowledging the "unique" history of anti-Semitism and trying to understand why Israelis fear for their existence.

He began this discussion by describing his own, first encounters with anti-Semitism, as a small boy. "I remember when I was a boy - a long time ago - when I was five or six years old and I lived in the countryside," he said, "and I remember Good Friday. What was the atmosphere a child breathed? `Be quiet, God is dead.' God died every year between Thursday and Saturday of Holy Week, and it made a profound impression on everyone. What happened? They would say, `The Jews killed God.' They blamed the Jews for killing God! Do you realize this?"

He went on, "Well, I didn't know what a Jew was. I knew of a bird that was a called a 'Jew,' and so for me the Jews were those birds. These birds had big noses. I don't even know why they were called that. That's what I remember. This is how ignorant the entire population was."

He said the Iranian government should understand the consequences of theological anti-Semitism. "This went on for maybe two thousand years," he said. "I don't think anyone has been slandered more than the Jews. I would say much more than the Muslims. They have been slandered much more than the Muslims because they are blamed and slandered for everything. No one blames the Muslims for anything." The Iranian government should understand that the Jews "were expelled from their land, persecuted and mistreated all over the world, as the ones who killed God. In my judgment here's what happened to them: Reverse selection. What's reverse selection? Over 2,000 years they were subjected to terrible persecution and then to the pogroms. One might have assumed that they would have disappeared; I think their culture and religion kept them together as a nation." He continued: "The Jews have lived an existence that is much harder than ours. There is nothing that compares to the Holocaust." I asked him if he would tell Ahmadinejad what he was telling me. "I am saying this so you can communicate it," he answered.

Castro went on to analyze the conflict between Israel and Iran. He said he understood Iranian fears of Israeli-American aggression and he added that, in his view, American sanctions and Israeli threats will not dissuade the Iranian leadership from pursuing nuclear weapons. "This problem is not going to get resolved, because the Iranians are not going to back down in the face of threats. That's my opinion," he said. He then noted that, unlike Cuba, Iran is a "profoundly religious country," and he said that religious leaders are less apt to compromise. He noted that even secular Cuba has resisted various American demands over the past 50 years.

We returned repeatedly in this first conversation to Castro's fear that a confrontation between the West and Iran could escalate into a nuclear conflict. "The Iranian capacity to inflict damage is not appreciated," he said. "Men think they can control themselves but Obama could overreact and a gradual escalation could become a nuclear war." I asked him if this fear was informed by his own experiences during the 1962 missile crisis, when the Soviet Union and the U.S. nearly went to war other over the presence of nuclear-tipped missiles in Cuba (missiles installed at the invitation, of course, of Fidel Castro). I mentioned to Castro the letter he wrote to Khruschev, the Soviet premier, at the height of the crisis, in which he recommended that the Soviets consider launching a nuclear strike against the U.S. if the Americans attack Cuba. "That would be the time to think about liquidating such a danger forever through a legal right of self-defense," Castro wrote at the time.

I asked him, "At a certain point it seemed logical for you to recommend that the Soviets bomb the U.S. Does what you recommended still seem logical now?" He answered: "After I've seen what I've seen, and knowing what I know now, it wasn't worth it all."

I was surprised to hear Castro express such doubts about his own behavior in the missile crisis - and I was, I admit, also surprised to hear him express such sympathy for Jews, and for Israel's right to exist (which he endorsed unequivocally).


After this first meeting, I asked Julia to explain the meaning of Castro's invitation to me, and of his message to Ahmadinejad. "Fidel is at an early stage of reinventing himself as a senior statesman, not as head of state, on the domestic stage, but primarily on the international stage, which has always been a priority for him," she said. "Matters of war, peace and international security are a central focus: Nuclear proliferation climate change, these are the major issues for him, and he's really just getting started, using any potential media platform to communicate his views. He has time on his hands now that he didn't expect to have. And he's revisiting history, and revisiting his own history."

There is a great deal more to report from this conversation, and from subsequent conversations, which I will do in posts to follow. But I will begin the next post on this subject by describing one of the stranger days I have experienced, a day which began with a simple question from Fidel: "Would you like to go to the aquarium with me to see the dolphin show?"

.................................................................

wow Castro admonishes Iran


now that is news !
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,210
484
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cVJ0bTbh9d4?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cVJ0bTbh9d4?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

:0002
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,210
484
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DwCTiAQs8DU?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DwCTiAQs8DU?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

:0corn
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
yeh so what

He is still President and may even get re-elected in 2012

When the neocons run out Sarah Palin and Newt

wtf

He will be reelected. He is actually a pretty good president - our best in a while.:mj06:
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,516
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
He will be reelected. He is actually a pretty good president - our best in a while.:mj06:

I'm sure you can identify with him Smurph.

In fact I would venture to say if you did poll with your dart club at closing time each night--you get 50% that agree with you--however you might not want to share that opinion with your boss :)
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Harry Truman's approval was 20% at the end of his term.

Harry's attitude was "I'm going to do what is right, and if the right-wingers don't lke it, fukkem. And fuck the popularity polls too."

Obama should take a clue from Harry and stop negotiating with right-wingers. It's like negotiating with a pack of skunks. The more he does it, the worse the stench.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,210
484
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
Harry Truman's approval was 20% at the end of his term.

Harry's attitude was "I'm going to do what is right, and if the right-wingers don't lke it, fukkem. And fuck the popularity polls too."

Obama should take a clue from Harry and stop negotiating with right-wingers. It's like negotiating with a pack of skunks. The more he does it, the worse the stench.

:mj07:

You mean what the UNION BOSSES tell him, Obama is a PUPPET for the UNIONS and George SOROS.

JMHO.

:facepalm:
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
He will be reelected. He is actually a pretty good president - our best in a while.:mj06:

This is actually true IF you have a strong desire to turn the USA into Greece. :nono:

I prefer a society based on capitalism, without a president continually deriding private enterprise and implementing price and profit controls.

If people really want to live in a "Greece" like country, there is always the option to move there for them.

No reason to change our great country into a dependent type "economy" like Europe, in my opinion.
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
Harry Truman's approval was 20% at the end of his term.

Harry's attitude was "I'm going to do what is right, and if the right-wingers don't lke it, fukkem. And fuck the popularity polls too."

Obama should take a clue from Harry and stop negotiating with right-wingers. It's like negotiating with a pack of skunks. The more he does it, the worse the stench.

Here's the thing Muff - "I'm gonna do what is right"

BUT if the majority of Americans are strongly against something, by definition, it can't be right.

Having someone go rogue, and implement anything that is outside of the majority of the country's interests based on consistent and widespread polling, isn't the right thing to do - it is just being a dictator.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
I'm sure you can identify with him Smurph.

In fact I would venture to say if you did poll with your dart club at closing time each night--you get 50% that agree with you--however you might not want to share that opinion with your boss :)

What the hell are you talking about?
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
Here's the thing Muff - "I'm gonna do what is right"

BUT if the majority of Americans are strongly against something, by definition, it can't be right.

Having someone go rogue, and implement anything that is outside of the majority of the country's interests based on consistent and widespread polling, isn't the right thing to do - it is just being a dictator.

..............................................................

why dont you just come out and say it

health care reform

There aint a damn thing you can do about it so just go with the flow and stop the corruption , stealing, lieing, cheating and lets get on with it
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
What the hell are you talking about?


Let me try to explain for DTBlackgumby

You can stand behind the President and maybe even vote for him in 2012

But since every business man in America hates Obama , its best you not say anything to your boss ( if you have one ) because they might fire you over the support .


At least thats the way DTB thinks about things in his own twisted fawk way :)
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
BUT if the majority of Americans are strongly against something, by definition, it can't be right.

I've seen some stupid shit posted here, but you, Mags, have just raised the bar.

Let's take just one simple example.

Attacking Iraq was either right or wrong.

In 2002, a majority of Americans were in favor of attacking Iraq. By your reasoning, that made it the "right" thing to do.

Today a majority of Americans say attacking Iraq was the "wrong" thing to do.

So, Mags, by your definition, was attacking Iraq "right" or wrong"?

Majority opinion is often a matter of insufficient information and emotion in place of reasoned thought.

Majority opinion is nothing more than mob rule.

It's no way to run a country.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,516
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
:mj07:

You mean what the UNION BOSSES tell him, Obama is a PUPPET for the UNIONS and George SOROS.

JMHO.

:facepalm:

Duff and Trench are very familar with Soros

This is replay of radio broadcast from their famous cyber uncle Haul Parvey-- :)

"Good morning america--
Was a cold winter night when two of america's media kings -Soros and Murdoch - sat at their fav bar for their monthly chat and boasting began on who had the most influence on their followers. Soros made challenge to Murdoch that he could get his base to elect anyone if Murdoch would give him 2 years and 10 to 1 odds. Never to shun a challenge Murdoch agreed and would bring his mark at their next meeting--one month to the day George was already on his 2nd drink when Rupert entered and threw down photo and name--
url


BARACk HUSSEIN OBAMA

--there was a minutes silence as george scratched his head--how about 4 years and 25-1 odds. Rupurt said deal. Was another minute of silence -then George dialed a #--on the other end was reply -Rezko here. Soros replied -Tony you got an acorn employee down your way--
--and we know--The Rest of the Story

This is Haul Parvey--Good Day :0008
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Duff and Trench are very familar with Soros

This is replay of radio broadcast from their famous cyber uncle Haul Parvey-- :)

George Soros? Yep, love him. He just gave $100 million to Human Rights Watch.

Although I'm not "familar" with him. LOL!

Issat alright with you, doggie, if George gives his money away, any way he likes? After all, you can give $100 million to any organization you like, right?

Paul Harvey Aurandt ? He died nearly two years ago at age 90, and he'd been a babbling idiot (Alzheimers?) for several years. But you'd quote a babbling idiot, right?

LOL! Write that check, doggie. Write that check - how about $200 million to the teabaggers? Too rich for your blood? Can you handle $3.79 to McDonald's?

Face it doggie. When it comes to making money in a capitalist system, George Soros has kicked your ass about a million to one. You could take some lessons from George.


George Soros - capitalist billionaire -

220px-George_Soros_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_Davos_2010.jpg



And doggie -

images
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top