State of the Union, Bush, dr freeze, equity trader, etc

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Nick I'll answer you the same way as I did last Politically Correct person that said bout the same on projects trying to distill the fact he was not prejudice.

I told him I'd come to Cincinnati take him out to any restaurant of his choice on the eve of halloween--but before we went to eat I'd have option to drop his kids off in any area of my choice to trick or treat and drop his wife off at bar of my choice. We would pick them up after we ate.

He, as with you was gung ho on talking the the talk but unwilling to walk the walk.

No offense to you as I like your attitude but the way we want things to be or think they should be are often far from reality.

---and on Taliban and Afgan--they did not scare me but the fact they provided opportunity for terrorist to train unabated did. N korea does not scare me a bit as they will never be able to send nukes here via air---but them selling them to terrorist to use over here is a concern. I think China will be our biggest ally as they do NOT like them having Nukes next door however the only reason they have not shut them down in my opinion is that staying on the fence gives them ace in hole on leverage against U.S. in Taiwan situation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DJV In answer to another one of your generalizations
"So Trying to act like there this great group of counties over there BS."

"At this time, 27 countries, in addition to the United States, have contributed a total of approximately 21,700 troops to ongoing stability operations in Iraq. These 27 are Albania, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the Dominican Republic, Georgia, El Salvador, Estonia, Honduras, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Mongolia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom.

In addition to the 27 countries with forces already on the ground in Iraq, four others (Moldova, the Philippines, Portugal, and Thailand) have committed to providing troops.

Fourteen other countries are currently considering whether to provide forces for Iraq"

So once again you prove that spin is the lefts best friend and facts their worst enemy--but you are in good company :)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Some Facts Go Missing

Friday, January 23, 2004



WASHINGTON ? Wesley Clark (search) left a few things out Thursday when he defended his Democratic credentials; namely, the Republicans he's supported for president.

"I voted for Bill Clinton and Al Gore," the retired general said in a Democratic presidential debate Thursday, then stopped there. He also has said previously that he voted for Republicans including Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and the first George Bush.

Stories not fully told were part of the story of the night.

John Kerry (search), a Vietnam veteran who addressed his days as a protest leader against that war, talked about how "we camped on the Mall underneath the Congress," although accounts of that April 1971 demonstration had him staying in a friend's Georgetown town house most nights while the masses stayed in tents.

Kerry spokesman David DiMartino said Kerry did sleep on the Mall and used the Georgetown house for protest organizing during the day.

Some of the characterizations of legislation were arguable.

Sen. John Edwards (search), voicing his objections to the Defense of Marriage Act signed by President Clinton in 1996, said it "took away the power of states ... to be able to do what they chose to do" about gay civil unions." He said, "I think these are decisions that the states should have the power to make."

States have that option under the law. The act allows states to refuse to honor same-sex unions performed outside their boundaries, but also lets them legalize the unions if they want. It specifies that such unions would not be recognized by the federal government.

Edwards did, however, acknowledge "I don't claim to be an expert on this."

Kerry flatly accused President Bush of "pushing seniors off of Medicare into HMOs."

The new prescription drug program subsidizes costs for low-income patients and encourages private insurance companies to offer coverage for the elderly willing to opt out of traditional Medicare. It does not force seniors off of Medicare.

Howard Dean (search), as he does routinely, stated that 60 percent of taxpayers only got $304 on average from Bush's tax cuts. That calculation applies to the lowest earning 60 percent of taxpayers -- many of whom pay little or no federal income tax to begin with. Middle income earners, especially those with children, saved substantially more than that from the lowering of income tax rates across the board.

Also in the debate, Clark was asked to account for his assertions earlier in the campaign that he would prevent another terrorist attack from happening like that of Sept. 11, 2001. "I never used the word 'guarantee," he said.

Clark's assurances, however, were close to categorical.

"If I'm president of the United States, I'm going to take care of the American people," Clark was quoted by the Concord Monitor in New Hampshire earlier this month. "We are not going to have one of these incidents."
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
6,690
71
48
Toronto
djv's got my favorite line, since my earlier post...
'his speech was at best long'...
I love it. Beauty.

I almost hate to disagree with you, Nick, as you seemed to agree with something I said (if nothing other than Demo's maintaining status quo - prop line actually -50,000 if John Kerry takes office), but I'm no gang member, and I certainly don't feel (completely) safe walking through certain areas of Toronto. While we ain't quite the peace-loving eskimos that some others have suggested, within other threads, I certainly accept that many U.S. cities have 'unsafer' areas than T.O. Still, you're original comparison was Iraq or , and I'd take the or .

Terrorism and National Security may have been the furthest things from the minds of the average citizen, but it was NOT the farthest thing from the minds of the Intelligence community, or the government as a whole. Many have already heard the hoopla about early warnings and other signs that something was going to happen. Forgetting, for now, such things as no air response or Bush's unbearably slow response to news of the second plane (somewhere I have a link to the full video of Bush in the classroom--doesn't provide much new info save for the fact that his ass was planted for a full 5 minutes after 'the whisper'), the best discussion of intelligence, and other signs, that I've seen is an essay by Russ Kick entitled Spetember 11, 2001 - No Surprise , published in a book entitled (somewhat insultingly) Everything You Know Is Wrong .

AR182--As for somebody - down there (or elsehwere) - not caring what people in other countries think of the American President ... well ... what can I say? Would life be worth living without a sense of humour? Think about that a sec. I say it wouldn't. Regardless, we now live in an international community, and I am inclined to think that many of us occasionally actually attempt to consider another's point of view. Should the people of foreign countries also not care what outsiders think of their leaders?
Our world has now come to the point where we rely on the international community to serve our national interests. For example, check out how much of America's energy and water needs are satisfied by trades with your northern neighbour.
Your wells are running dry, my friend, but if you think that you can go it alone...well...I've got some helium-3 on the moon that I'd like to sell you.

Blitz, are you really 'taking the fight to the terrorists,' or did they bring it to you? Some say that the terrorists' cause is just being served by the extensive military action that is being conducted. What % of the U.S. military is currently employed in the Middle East, anyway? 50 or 60%, ain't it? Gee...I hope no bad guys over there have any big bombs that they're hiding. And what about the future genetic composition of many Americans if reports of radioactive contamination in many regions are true? Sometimes I wonder if some, in the administration, have been spending too much time reading Revelations.

This State of the Union thread has kinda evolved into a monster (oops...didn't mean it, but check out the Steppenwolf tune (long version at over 9 minutes) for some irony).
I sure as hell don't wanna piss anyone off; lots of great people at this site, which I've been perusing for about 4 years, and posting at for 3.
Good people here including, of course, many Americans.
Born and raised in T.O., I've never considered myself any different from those of you south of the border.
I have no problem with Americans.
I just think that government policy (yours, ours, and others) could use jusssssssst a little bit of tweaking.
We're all in this together.

Everywhere is freaks and hairies
Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity
Tax the rich, feed the poor
Till there are no rich no more
(Ten Years After-I'd Love to Change the World)
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
6,690
71
48
Toronto
Rats...couldn't you wait until my part II was done and I was history.
Fine...one more thing..

DTB, not a criticism, but just a question.
Two words, I'm not sure how you're using them...
'lefts' and 'facts'
I think I know what you mean by the second one (facts), but I'm wondering if you're not paying too much for what you buy.
As for the first, methinks you should do some research.
Hey...I'm into a few less corporate bailouts myself, if it will help provide shelter for some homeless, or maybe feed a starving kid or two (million). I f'en hate politics, but that's pretty lefty.

Long ago I wandered through my mind
In the land of fairie tales and stories
Lost in happiness I knew no fears
Innocence and love was all I knew
...was an illusion!
(Black Sabbath-Wheels of Confusion)
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Legitamate question and let me 1st say I trust no politicians and you will get spin from both sides.--but my point is
read this article from USA Today then read "Some missing facts"
Can you see the differnce by tell part of the story but not all of it?
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...20040123/ts_usatoday/deanworksonimageatdebate

Heres another classic today by Kerry

"At one point, Kerry was asked how he would feel as president if U.S. military personnel threw away their combat medals in protest, as Kerry and other Vietnam War veterans did in the early 1970s. Kerry called the veterans' protest "a movement of conscience," and said he was proud that they had stood up against President Richard M. Nixon"

1st if memory serves me correct it was Nixon that got us "out" of Viet Nam and Johnson that got us in---and while he "allegedly" threw his medals away in disgust--he runs almost his entire campaign on that very issue---even bringing in soilder that he supposedly saved after failing to ever contact him once since since the war till he could now use him to his advantage.
---however that is no worse than Bush or any other politician with the camera rolling while they frequent minority churches for their annual 5 minute visit every 4 years.

I made note of this prior but I have seen several conservatives get on Bush for things we disagree with (Medicare and Immigration policy) are 2 I adamantly hate and will also say Bush Sr and Swarzkoffs promising Iraqi's support and pulling out to leave them slaughter was the worse etrocitie I have seen--yet liberals continue to defend anyone regardless of their actions or lack there of. You think for a minute you or I would not have spent jail time for half the stuff that Slick is now being rewarded for speaking engagements?

scroll thru some of the 140 pardons this liberal icon pardoned.
It is amazing to me how anyone who thinks for himself can not find this man as a bottom feeder.
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm
 
Last edited:

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
42,927
2,075
113
On the course!
EXTRAPOLATER said:

Long ago I wandered through my mind
In the land of fairie tales and stories
Lost in happiness I knew no fears
Innocence and love was all I knew
...was (it) illusion?
(Black Sabbath-Wheels of Confusion)


I think you might still be there!


Put down the fatty, step away from the computer
Aids was man-made, and there was no 'second shooter'
Some say spay, I say neuter
Why'd I buy a skateboard, when I coulda had a scooter

(yyz-WTF You Talkin' 'Bout?)
 
Last edited:

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
DTB your numbers are very close and I agree because it's just what I was saying. after 140000 U S and 14000 Brits. We now have from about another 15 countries maybe 10000 troops. So Far 503 Americans have died estimate Britts dead 37 have not seen update for over 30 days for the britts. Other countris dead 6. Tell me about all that help again. You talk spin. The only spin coming out of DC is they never mention numbers. Thats why the Prez said that big mouth full of nothing in his speech. Just said all the members like there were thousands and thousands there helping. Now that's a spin. And now Iraqis agree lets have free elections. Hold it we say wait a minute wrong guy would get elected. We will do it another way to make sure thet dont happen. Dam DTB we have used 10 differant reasons why we went there and caused a big mess. And now we are going to re-nig on one of the main ones again. It just shows the leadership hasn't a clue.
 

ocelot

Registered User
Forum Member
May 21, 2003
1,937
0
0
Mount Shasta
And then there are our wounded and crippled that our patriot of a President abandons. He talks real tough and blusters and then leaves those who have paid the price in blood behind.

I say our men and women who come back with their bodies shattered should be getting the BEST from this country. They don't even get recognition...nothing!

And the dead? Will there be ANY kind of memorial? Not if its left to Satan-Incarnate Cheney.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
Not my #s DJV but the presses #'s. I try not to use opinions in stating #'s.

When people join military it is assumed soilders haverisk and are not joining a country club. I don't think anyone wants one death but something had to be done to prevent another 2,700 plus on our own soil in a day.

--But it it apparent the 2 of you would prefer a leader like past that looked the other way when offered Bin Laden.

Let me compliment the two of you as the death #'s that may have been prevented had your fearless leader Slick had just enough hair on his nuts to take OSB when offered actually decreased today.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,109283,00.html

Now report back to everyone about these #'s and how they could have been prevented.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Looking back wards is easy. Look at how all are agenicies with all info avaliable didn't catch on with what was coming. And it's not the number of deaths im talking about so much as Bush keeps making it sound like there just tons of people in there helping us. It's just not true. As for Bin he did not mention him once for a reason. And im glad Saddam is gone. However we could start today to get rid of him. If even necessary. He just was not that big a problem. We could have stayed with the hunt for the real killer with more impact a little longer. And I cant say what Slick Willy or anyone else would have handle 9/11. I hope with more folks involved then what we have now.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
an email I received

an email I received

Remember when:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the
capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to
deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton,Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our
purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by
Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton,Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there
matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue
state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our
allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright,Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger,Clinton National Security Adviser,Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions, including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons
of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin,
Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region
and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA),Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright,Clinton's Secretary of State,Nov.10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition,
Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using
the cover of a elicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles
that will threaten the United States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,)
and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
and
the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI),Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore,Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in power."
- Al Gore,Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking
and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA),Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.
We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of
chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a
crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV),Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States
the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA),Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is
working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have
nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember
we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV),Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and
destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear
capacity. This he has refused to do"
- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA),Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including
al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage
biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop
nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY),Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL),Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction . So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


SO NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED,
THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES???

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM...........................



:shrug:
 

Wilson

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 8, 2002
4,426
10
0
1813 Virginia St
Intense,

The Democrats are some of the most two faced and crooked sumbitches on Earth. Nothing they do or say suprises me. George W Bush is a man of character and thank God we have him to stand up to these defacating lunatics that are trying to unseat him.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Well when I look at what Clinton said in 1998. One way or another we will deny Iraq WMD and the missles to deliver them. Good job MR. Clinton. They still dont have any. What ever you did or what ever secreat program you put in place worked. We just spent 200 billion and 505 GI's dead to try and show your plan did not work. Now that is a real crime.
Back to the speech. It just was so lacking of everthing. For sure the money to pay for anything. He blew the money last three years.
 

Snake Plissken

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 21, 2000
849
0
0
57
The Island of Manhattan
nyt-041303.gif
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
DJV:
"Well when I look at what Clinton said in 1998. One way or another we will deny Iraq WMD and the missles to deliver them. Good job MR. Clinton.

Would you like to skip opinion just once and give us the facts on how he denied these?

He had same CIA directer as Bush(Tenet) got same info and came to same conclusion.

The only diif between he and Bush on Iraq and fighting terrorism is one did nothing and the other acted.

He also had same info from Tenet and others on Bin Laden.
Yet Slick would not take him when offered and you and the left have the audacity to Whine about the deaths in Bushes term on fighting these individuals.

Do you and liberal friends remotely have any clue how many lives could have possibly be spared Slick had just a single hair on his nuts and taken UBL?????

Why don't you and your liberal friends write a letter to all the widows and orphans of the result of the most probable hugest military blunder in history and tell them "Good job MR. Clinton."
:nooo:
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Intenseoperator Stated thats what CLinton said they were going to do. My answer was he must have did agood job.
No place has it been proven that clinton or our militaryhad aclear shot at bin. Much talk but no Proffe.
Now how did our government not put all info togeather that 9/11 was coming. We will find out when investiagtion is complete. But from all early info it looks like it could have been prevented. When your FBI/CIA/Adminastration dont talk. You get chit. And we sure did. Now lets find out why the SOB's don't like to work togeather.
What I am still surprised about with you being a vet and all the chit you saw. Why you believe so strongley we needed to invade Iraq. And why it had to just be us that thought the cause was needed at once. Yes the Britts did agree. But we say to them when it's time to chit latley and they agree.
Anyway the speech let us wondering what great adventure Cheney and Bush might think of next. Bin must not be on there minds any more since he was not mentioned. And since were now out of cash. Well not totally there borrowing another 122 billion form the S/S fund that will never get payed back. We need less Government and we keep getting more. When the hell are the real conservatives going to show up again.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
No proof???? Have you ever heard about ordeal in Sudan among others.

Who from his own administration do you want to here it from?
Clintons Secretary of Defense--Casper Weinberger
Clinton Adviser Dick Morris
Russian President Vladimir Putin
Iraqi expert Laurie Mylroie
Department of Energy official Notra Trulock
The Liberal Boston Globe among bout every other publication? and even "Clinton himself."

But don't feel bad there is one other that takes sameview as you


http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2002/9/15/120222
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top