2004 Pac 10 OOC vs SEC OOC Opponents!!!
- Thread starter Scott4USC
- Start date
scott4usc,
you've pissed enopugh people off, you've been warned before, so knock it the **** off.
if it's not about handicapping and winning money betting sports, it's OFF TOPIC.
i don't have time to follow you around and answering emails from people wanting you banned. it's getting real close, i'll tell you that.
if anybody sees OFF TOPIC rah-rah bullshit, please report it to a moderator and they will handle it from there.
there's a little icon at the top right of each post that sends the reported post to admin or a moderator.
thanks,
Jack
you've pissed enopugh people off, you've been warned before, so knock it the **** off.
if it's not about handicapping and winning money betting sports, it's OFF TOPIC.
i don't have time to follow you around and answering emails from people wanting you banned. it's getting real close, i'll tell you that.
if anybody sees OFF TOPIC rah-rah bullshit, please report it to a moderator and they will handle it from there.
there's a little icon at the top right of each post that sends the reported post to admin or a moderator.
thanks,
Jack
MadJack
Why are they so pissed? Madjack, just use this thread as an example. Scroll up and read the very first post (by me). It was about SEC vs Pac 10 OOC opponents. Then go look at the replies. Why are they so pissed? They are pissed because they do like hearing the truth. Nothing wrong with my post at all. Please just look at the 1st post in this thread and tell me if ANYTHING was wrong with it. THEN go read the replies. You will see numerous posts OFF TOPIC and POSTS ATTACKING ME instead of the information. It is as clear as night and day. Look for yourself.
I agree. Isn't this a college football forum? Isn't talking about conferences related to talking about college football? Isn't this the off-season? I do not think ANY of my threads have been OFF TOPIC! Maybe my threads would not belong during the season, but this is the off season and I can quote you saying pretty much anything goes during the off season in the college football forum. If you look at all my posts, they are related to college football. It is not my fault is posters come crying to you. You should click reply and say GROW UP!
That would be a shame but that call is up to you because it is your site. But if you do choose to ban me, I would appreciate a reason why. If you ban me because people hate me, then that is pretty weak in my opinion.
I HAVE A REPORT TO MAKE TO YOU!!!!!! Take a look at the replies to this thread. MANY WERE OFF TOPIC!!! But those posts are valuable right? You support posters on your site who make attacks and cannot even contribute to the thread. Is that what you want Madjack? Are you going to let these crybabies run your forum? They are crying to you because of my posts? My posts are related to college football and are very well written. NOT BS POSTS AND have plenty of substance in them. They unfortunately cannot handle or accept it so they cry to you.
If these crybabies are saying I am controlling your forum take a second look. I have posted 5 threads in this forum. Out of the last 50 threads, I have started only 5. Of those 5, which of those do YOU MADJACK have a problem with? You obviously do not have a problem with Kdogg21 posting thread about SEC is good, PAC 10 bad. How about Scott-Atlanta thread about USC Thugs and delinquents. That sure contributes to the college football forum. I don't have problem with it, but if you have problem with MY THREADS why are these ok? Oh I know, cuz crybabies don't e-mail you about those threads but they select mine. Maybe you really like the thread Avalanche posted with title "Thoughts on Powerful Pac10 Football Teams" and then inside the post saying N/A. I thought it was funny and don't have a problem with it but if you compare that to my posts, I state my opinion and reasons why. I even give factual data. You have a problem with my posts but not these? You want me to compare more posts?
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS THREAD AGAIN! If these are the same people who want me banned, then that is bogus. I thought a college football forum is a place where you can talk college football (especially in the off-season) Yet you continue to let people post NON COLLEGE FOOTBALL MATERIAL and MAKE PERSONAL ATTACKS??? Don't believe me? Just use this thread as an example and scroll up and read this thread over. Look at my first post and look at the replies. I do not come crying to you and neither should they. I thought adults are posting and using your forum.
All in all, I think you are focusing on the wrong poster Madjack!!!!! Thanks again for running a great site and I enjoy participating in it. It is your site and it is your call if you want to ban me. I will accept your decision. I just hope you do what YOU think is right and not what others think. It is your site.
Why are they so pissed? Madjack, just use this thread as an example. Scroll up and read the very first post (by me). It was about SEC vs Pac 10 OOC opponents. Then go look at the replies. Why are they so pissed? They are pissed because they do like hearing the truth. Nothing wrong with my post at all. Please just look at the 1st post in this thread and tell me if ANYTHING was wrong with it. THEN go read the replies. You will see numerous posts OFF TOPIC and POSTS ATTACKING ME instead of the information. It is as clear as night and day. Look for yourself.
I agree. Isn't this a college football forum? Isn't talking about conferences related to talking about college football? Isn't this the off-season? I do not think ANY of my threads have been OFF TOPIC! Maybe my threads would not belong during the season, but this is the off season and I can quote you saying pretty much anything goes during the off season in the college football forum. If you look at all my posts, they are related to college football. It is not my fault is posters come crying to you. You should click reply and say GROW UP!
That would be a shame but that call is up to you because it is your site. But if you do choose to ban me, I would appreciate a reason why. If you ban me because people hate me, then that is pretty weak in my opinion.
I HAVE A REPORT TO MAKE TO YOU!!!!!! Take a look at the replies to this thread. MANY WERE OFF TOPIC!!! But those posts are valuable right? You support posters on your site who make attacks and cannot even contribute to the thread. Is that what you want Madjack? Are you going to let these crybabies run your forum? They are crying to you because of my posts? My posts are related to college football and are very well written. NOT BS POSTS AND have plenty of substance in them. They unfortunately cannot handle or accept it so they cry to you.
If these crybabies are saying I am controlling your forum take a second look. I have posted 5 threads in this forum. Out of the last 50 threads, I have started only 5. Of those 5, which of those do YOU MADJACK have a problem with? You obviously do not have a problem with Kdogg21 posting thread about SEC is good, PAC 10 bad. How about Scott-Atlanta thread about USC Thugs and delinquents. That sure contributes to the college football forum. I don't have problem with it, but if you have problem with MY THREADS why are these ok? Oh I know, cuz crybabies don't e-mail you about those threads but they select mine. Maybe you really like the thread Avalanche posted with title "Thoughts on Powerful Pac10 Football Teams" and then inside the post saying N/A. I thought it was funny and don't have a problem with it but if you compare that to my posts, I state my opinion and reasons why. I even give factual data. You have a problem with my posts but not these? You want me to compare more posts?
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS THREAD AGAIN! If these are the same people who want me banned, then that is bogus. I thought a college football forum is a place where you can talk college football (especially in the off-season) Yet you continue to let people post NON COLLEGE FOOTBALL MATERIAL and MAKE PERSONAL ATTACKS??? Don't believe me? Just use this thread as an example and scroll up and read this thread over. Look at my first post and look at the replies. I do not come crying to you and neither should they. I thought adults are posting and using your forum.
All in all, I think you are focusing on the wrong poster Madjack!!!!! Thanks again for running a great site and I enjoy participating in it. It is your site and it is your call if you want to ban me. I will accept your decision. I just hope you do what YOU think is right and not what others think. It is your site.
Last edited:
Bottom line. You may almost be comparable to sec ooc schedule , but the thing that makes the sec better and tougher is their in conference schedule, which yall do not have a good one to say the least
I completely agree Avalanche; I have followed your picks in the NBA the last couple of years and you have made me alot of money on your 2nd half picks; I know college football is not your niche but your picks are still solid and I respect your handicapping skills and your posts. I agree there are places for his opinions and its called the USC message forum not Madjacks. I have learned to tune him out; I figure if people stop responding to him he can go back to his studies and graduate before he is 30 and start making his 35k a year :142lmao: or in scott4usc's terms :topic: :topic:
Avalanche
I think you misunderstood what I was trying to tell markh. I simply told him to use his brain and post something related to the material of the thread. This thread was about SEC vs Pac 10 OOC and markh posted NOTHING about the subject. Understand? I did not simply attack markh out of the blue. His post provided NOTHING towards this thread. Why is that so hard to understand? Why do people hear take offense to that? markh talked about ME not the material inside the post. Unlike many of you, I attack the material inside the post. I do not care about your opinions about me or any other posters on this site. Just talk college football and talk about the material in each thread. Do not open up someones thread and talking about something NOT related to the material inside the thread. That is what markh and others did in this thread.
What the heck are you talking about? MarkH did not even talk about COLLEGE FOOTBALL in his post inside this thread and this is a college football forum. I do not need attention so nobody needs to post about me. Just talk about the material inside the post. Is that hard to understand? Is that so hard to do? If it is, don't reply.
What arguments am I suppose to respect? Take this thread for example. SHOW ME ONE FREAKING ARGUMENT I AM SUPPOSE TO RESPECT? That Master Capper thinks I am the poster name RAT? MARKH wants me banned? BBK obession over me? What arguments??? Get real. I respect people who deserve respect. I do not respect garbage posts. Wareagle and Scott disagreed with what I had in my original post and I replied to them respectfully and actually agreed with them. I clearly made mistake and admitted to it.
That is incorrect. I never ONCE posted the SEC OOC vs USC OOC opponents. NOT ONCE. My posts are not the same stuff over and over again. If you are not interested in them, simply don't read them. My posts would then get buried. Out of the 50 current threads on Madjacks, I have started only 5 of them. If you want to have an intellectual debate, then please do reply and talk about the material NOT me.
That is funny. I want and have asked you to explain why I am "180 degrees" from being right. That is the difference between you and me. I can state my opinion and back it up. If I disagree with someone, I have ability to counter argue his opinion/data and explain why I disagree. That is called debating. Simply saying I am wrong and you are right is child's play.
Clever ending to your post. I liked it.
I think you misunderstood what I was trying to tell markh. I simply told him to use his brain and post something related to the material of the thread. This thread was about SEC vs Pac 10 OOC and markh posted NOTHING about the subject. Understand? I did not simply attack markh out of the blue. His post provided NOTHING towards this thread. Why is that so hard to understand? Why do people hear take offense to that? markh talked about ME not the material inside the post. Unlike many of you, I attack the material inside the post. I do not care about your opinions about me or any other posters on this site. Just talk college football and talk about the material in each thread. Do not open up someones thread and talking about something NOT related to the material inside the thread. That is what markh and others did in this thread.
What the heck are you talking about? MarkH did not even talk about COLLEGE FOOTBALL in his post inside this thread and this is a college football forum. I do not need attention so nobody needs to post about me. Just talk about the material inside the post. Is that hard to understand? Is that so hard to do? If it is, don't reply.
What arguments am I suppose to respect? Take this thread for example. SHOW ME ONE FREAKING ARGUMENT I AM SUPPOSE TO RESPECT? That Master Capper thinks I am the poster name RAT? MARKH wants me banned? BBK obession over me? What arguments??? Get real. I respect people who deserve respect. I do not respect garbage posts. Wareagle and Scott disagreed with what I had in my original post and I replied to them respectfully and actually agreed with them. I clearly made mistake and admitted to it.
That is incorrect. I never ONCE posted the SEC OOC vs USC OOC opponents. NOT ONCE. My posts are not the same stuff over and over again. If you are not interested in them, simply don't read them. My posts would then get buried. Out of the 50 current threads on Madjacks, I have started only 5 of them. If you want to have an intellectual debate, then please do reply and talk about the material NOT me.
That is funny. I want and have asked you to explain why I am "180 degrees" from being right. That is the difference between you and me. I can state my opinion and back it up. If I disagree with someone, I have ability to counter argue his opinion/data and explain why I disagree. That is called debating. Simply saying I am wrong and you are right is child's play.
Clever ending to your post. I liked it.
Last edited:
MarkH was pointing out that Memphis is a better team than you give them credit for (rightly or wrongly) but still I don't give a flying *@*(# what he posts, there is no reason for you to make such a comment like "use what's between your ears" and all that BS you come up with. The guy makes one post and you respond with something like that? That's insane.
If I had a dollar for every time you said to me "you have poor reading comprehension" etc I'd be retired. And what's funny is I comprehend quite well, thank you. You are the one that has some certainly selective reading comprehension. You dodge all the arguments i make at least and blame it on "like National championships matters" and Kdogg21 posts you a boatload of SEC stats that your weak-ass Pac 10 girls conference can't match and you just act like you never see the posts. Where's that stat sheet on how great the Pac 10 is? I'm still waiting for it. Show me all of the accomplishments of the Pac 10 in the past 24 years please. Compare it to what the SEC has done, and until you do that, just STF up
Does the fact that Madjack coming in here saying you piss him off tell ya anything???
Or do you still have poor reading comprehension?
If I had a dollar for every time you said to me "you have poor reading comprehension" etc I'd be retired. And what's funny is I comprehend quite well, thank you. You are the one that has some certainly selective reading comprehension. You dodge all the arguments i make at least and blame it on "like National championships matters" and Kdogg21 posts you a boatload of SEC stats that your weak-ass Pac 10 girls conference can't match and you just act like you never see the posts. Where's that stat sheet on how great the Pac 10 is? I'm still waiting for it. Show me all of the accomplishments of the Pac 10 in the past 24 years please. Compare it to what the SEC has done, and until you do that, just STF up
Does the fact that Madjack coming in here saying you piss him off tell ya anything???
Or do you still have poor reading comprehension?
Avalanche :nono: :nono: :nono:
Are you sure about that? :shrug:
YOU SAID....
MarkH NEVER commented on Memphis!!!!!!!!!! You continue to make yourself look foolish. Again, you people need to take the focus off of me and focus on the material. When I say someone has a poor reading comprehension, I mean it. Proof is in the pudding. You must read carefully. Avalanche feel free to continue to make personal attacks at me. It will not stop me from calling a spade a spade.
Here is Markh's original post....
Please point out where he talked about Memphis? Please point out where he talked about the SEC vs Pac 10 OOC?? :topic:
You sure comprehend quite well. :nooo: Please, lets take the focus off of me, and just focus on COLLEGE FOOTBALL. This is a COLLEGE FOOTBALL FORUM. Not a SCOTT4USC forum. So stop making me into some star! I do not need the attention.
Are you sure about that? :shrug:
YOU SAID....
MarkH NEVER commented on Memphis!!!!!!!!!! You continue to make yourself look foolish. Again, you people need to take the focus off of me and focus on the material. When I say someone has a poor reading comprehension, I mean it. Proof is in the pudding. You must read carefully. Avalanche feel free to continue to make personal attacks at me. It will not stop me from calling a spade a spade.
Here is Markh's original post....
Please point out where he talked about Memphis? Please point out where he talked about the SEC vs Pac 10 OOC?? :topic:
You sure comprehend quite well. :nooo: Please, lets take the focus off of me, and just focus on COLLEGE FOOTBALL. This is a COLLEGE FOOTBALL FORUM. Not a SCOTT4USC forum. So stop making me into some star! I do not need the attention.
Last edited:
Listen you freakin idiot I don't give a flying (#@(#( what Mark H posted and yes I confused Scott with Mark but you are MISSING THE FREAKIN POINT YOU IDIOT:
My point is this:
MARKH MAKES ONE POST AND YOU RESPOND WITH YOUR PATENTED CRAP SAYING "USE WHAT'S BETWEEN YOUR EARS"
I dont give a (#@(# what he posted about, his point wasn't on Memphis but it was well taken. He was pointing out to you that this is a handicapping forum not a fan forum.
Quit splitting hairs over the content. My point is you tried to "blast him" for what he posted and you claim he needs to start "using what's between his ears" after ONE post!?!?!?!?!
WTF are you about anyway Scott4USC, you are an absolute joke.
WHERE IS YOUR STAT SHEET ON THE PAC10 LIKE KDOG21 POSTED FOR THE SEC??????????????????????
WHERE IS IT????? POST IT
WHERE IS THE STAT SHEET ABOUT THE PAC 10'S ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR THE PAST 24 YEARS????????????????? WHERE IS IT????? WHERE????? WHERE???? WHERE????
My point is this:
MARKH MAKES ONE POST AND YOU RESPOND WITH YOUR PATENTED CRAP SAYING "USE WHAT'S BETWEEN YOUR EARS"
I dont give a (#@(# what he posted about, his point wasn't on Memphis but it was well taken. He was pointing out to you that this is a handicapping forum not a fan forum.
Quit splitting hairs over the content. My point is you tried to "blast him" for what he posted and you claim he needs to start "using what's between his ears" after ONE post!?!?!?!?!
WTF are you about anyway Scott4USC, you are an absolute joke.
WHERE IS YOUR STAT SHEET ON THE PAC10 LIKE KDOG21 POSTED FOR THE SEC??????????????????????
WHERE IS IT????? POST IT
WHERE IS THE STAT SHEET ABOUT THE PAC 10'S ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR THE PAST 24 YEARS????????????????? WHERE IS IT????? WHERE????? WHERE???? WHERE????
Thank you MadJack. I can't believe he talked back at you the way he did. Then again, he really thinks he is always right and that everybody else has problems except him. Hopefully the 3 days becomes permanently banned. :clap:
MH
MH
thank you jack. its people like him that really make me not want to post in this forum. everyone is entitled to their opinion and all, but to sit and riducle people for trying to make an effort and points on a topic is insane.
im sure he will come back in 3 days and ruin it for himself again.
im sure he will come back in 3 days and ruin it for himself again.
Before I left last week to go on my honeymoon I decided to take a peek in here and see what was going on. When I saw this thread I thought yep here we go again, football is upon us again. Well after reading the thread I decided to drop a little nonsense on it with the following paragraph.
I will start off by saying one thing, if you can read this and think that I am being serious in my statements then you are no doubt the dumbass that I have always thought you to be! I was replying in this manner for a little bit of a joke, if you have ever read my posts you would know that I have a bit of a light side.
I was merely trying to, in a silly way point out to you that your opinion of the SEC OOC opponents is not a fair one, although it is your opinion. Our in conference schedule is tough enough that we don't need to schedule any harder teams when we don't need to.
You will not have to worry about responding to my posts ever again.........please never pollute mine. I like the rest of these folks around here can not wait to see your presence here removed. Hope you have a great PAC-10 Season and you are laughing all the way to the water cooler with the rest of the PAC-10ers.
I will start off by saying one thing, if you can read this and think that I am being serious in my statements then you are no doubt the dumbass that I have always thought you to be! I was replying in this manner for a little bit of a joke, if you have ever read my posts you would know that I have a bit of a light side.
I was merely trying to, in a silly way point out to you that your opinion of the SEC OOC opponents is not a fair one, although it is your opinion. Our in conference schedule is tough enough that we don't need to schedule any harder teams when we don't need to.
You will not have to worry about responding to my posts ever again.........please never pollute mine. I like the rest of these folks around here can not wait to see your presence here removed. Hope you have a great PAC-10 Season and you are laughing all the way to the water cooler with the rest of the PAC-10ers.
Bluemound Freak congratulations on getting married. I truly wish you a happy and long lasting marriage.
Hopefully next time you will think twice before dropping "a little nonsense on it."
Someone sent me an interesting article. Thought I would share it.
Interesting Article
Cupcake city - Breaking down the schedules
Who schedules the most cupcakes? Here's a rundown of Division I-A schools that scheduled Division I-AA teams this year:
ACC - 6 cupcake games
Big East - 6 cupcake games
SEC - 5 cupcake games
Big XII - 4 cupcake games
Conf USA - 3 cupcake games
Mountain West - 2 cupcake games
Big Ten - 2 cupcake games
Pac 10 - 1 cupcake game
Hopefully next time you will think twice before dropping "a little nonsense on it."
Someone sent me an interesting article. Thought I would share it.
Interesting Article
Cupcake city - Breaking down the schedules
Who schedules the most cupcakes? Here's a rundown of Division I-A schools that scheduled Division I-AA teams this year:
ACC - 6 cupcake games
Big East - 6 cupcake games
SEC - 5 cupcake games
Big XII - 4 cupcake games
Conf USA - 3 cupcake games
Mountain West - 2 cupcake games
Big Ten - 2 cupcake games
Pac 10 - 1 cupcake game
Who is to say that some of the schools in different conferences don't resemble a D2 school. Damn, U of Arizona last year was awful. Stanford and ASU were a scale better than the Wildcats. I tell ya, TNT had a few of Arizona's games on early in the year and they got the snot knocked out of them and it would not have surprised me to see them lose to a Troy St. or something. Hell, ASU had trouble with a few weak schools last year.
The bottome line is, Scott, you would never post anything that would make the other major conferences look good. You only post pro-Pac-10 stuff, over and over. You just had to post something else to pound your chest about how the Pac-10 only supposedly had one cupcake.
Just to show you how legitimate this post is, you are trying to tell me the MWC had 2 cupcakes, how about how awful teams are in that conf. that play one another each week. By posting that the MWC had 2 cupcakes shows us all that this article has not substance to be able to lump in such a weak conf and actually try to tell us all they had 2 cupcakes. How about most of their conf. were cupcakes. Give me a break. You will never let up with this pro-USC and pro-PAC-10 horsecrap.
MH
The bottome line is, Scott, you would never post anything that would make the other major conferences look good. You only post pro-Pac-10 stuff, over and over. You just had to post something else to pound your chest about how the Pac-10 only supposedly had one cupcake.
Just to show you how legitimate this post is, you are trying to tell me the MWC had 2 cupcakes, how about how awful teams are in that conf. that play one another each week. By posting that the MWC had 2 cupcakes shows us all that this article has not substance to be able to lump in such a weak conf and actually try to tell us all they had 2 cupcakes. How about most of their conf. were cupcakes. Give me a break. You will never let up with this pro-USC and pro-PAC-10 horsecrap.
MH
Last edited:
Markh
First of all, why are you trying to turn my last post into a Pac 10 or USC debate? It was not.
2nd of all, the only reason I posted this thread was because Avalanche asked me to post the SEC vs Pac 10 OOC opponents. I answered his request. If you have a problem with that, take it up with him.
Why do you have a problem with my last post, posting the conferences and the number of Div. 1aa opponents they played? It showed that the M-West, Big 10, and Pac 10 don't play many div. 1aa opponents. They should be congratulated and the other conf. should be questioned.
You may have a different interpretation on what a CUPCAKE is but the article clearly defined that they view a cupcake as a div. 1aa opponent.
That data that I read in the article was related to this thread. Don't forget that Avalanche asked me to post the data SEC OOC vs PAC 10 OOC. Maybe you were not aware of that. So please stop making my last post into a USC or Pac 10 debate. I did not single out the Pac 10 in my last post.
Then you put down Arizona and implied that they were of equal value to a div. 1aa opponent. Not quite sure why you did that but I disagree. Article was about 1aa teams vs 1a teams not about 1a teams who are bad.
Maybe you were not aware that Arizona for the 1st half of the season was coached by coach Mack. HORRIBLE COACH! Texas fans would agree! When he left, Arizona played inspired football and upset Washington. You also were prob. not aware that Arizona played the #4 toughest schedule last year and won 2 games.
First of all, why are you trying to turn my last post into a Pac 10 or USC debate? It was not.
2nd of all, the only reason I posted this thread was because Avalanche asked me to post the SEC vs Pac 10 OOC opponents. I answered his request. If you have a problem with that, take it up with him.
Why do you have a problem with my last post, posting the conferences and the number of Div. 1aa opponents they played? It showed that the M-West, Big 10, and Pac 10 don't play many div. 1aa opponents. They should be congratulated and the other conf. should be questioned.
You may have a different interpretation on what a CUPCAKE is but the article clearly defined that they view a cupcake as a div. 1aa opponent.
That data that I read in the article was related to this thread. Don't forget that Avalanche asked me to post the data SEC OOC vs PAC 10 OOC. Maybe you were not aware of that. So please stop making my last post into a USC or Pac 10 debate. I did not single out the Pac 10 in my last post.
Then you put down Arizona and implied that they were of equal value to a div. 1aa opponent. Not quite sure why you did that but I disagree. Article was about 1aa teams vs 1a teams not about 1a teams who are bad.
Maybe you were not aware that Arizona for the 1st half of the season was coached by coach Mack. HORRIBLE COACH! Texas fans would agree! When he left, Arizona played inspired football and upset Washington. You also were prob. not aware that Arizona played the #4 toughest schedule last year and won 2 games.
I live in PAC-10 country, coach football still at the HS level, have numerous ex-teammates from Oregon who coach in CFB, NFL and CFL. So I am more than aware about John Mackovic. Bottom line is the Wildcats rolled over and died on several occasions even after Mackovic left. So don't try to tell me the 1st half of the season was their problem, when it was more than that.
MH
MH
