sorry, but you are wrong. I know it, as fact, that you're wrong, as does i'd say every single person who has posted in this thread.
you see, you are one of these people that can not accept being on the wrong side. it does not matter what anyone says or presents to you with logic because you are hell bent on proving your opinion is right.
to me it is hilarious that youd call anyone on here ignorant, because you are by far the most ignorant, stubborn, block headed person I have ever come across on this website. I don't know what issue you have but you feel the need to force your opinions, often wrong ones, down everyones throat, on every subject that has ever been posted.
I have seriously never met anyone who is such an expert on so many topics. It is truly remarkable. :facepalm:
because you volunteer a few times a week around an aggressive by nature dog breed, you think that you are an expert. hey fuck everyone elses opinion and what every day life tells us because theyre not FDC and they dont work with these aggressive dogs a few times a week.
what youve never learned as a youth is accepting that you are wrong.
carry on debating this till you are blue in the face, but I know, as does everyone else, what the truth is, and your asinine rants are going to sway nobody.
First off, I'm much more intelligent and well read than you. The fact that you try to diminish my intelligence as well as any charitable work I might do, only makrs you look petty.
You know for a fact that scientists have identified an allele for aggression that any and all pit bulls are born with?
Show me the report. Post that mother fucker right fucking now. I need to see it.
Make sure it identifies pit bulls as a breed first too idiot. You know for a fucking fact. PROVE IT RIGHT NOW.
BP,
No that's not what I'm saying. Breeding dogs for personality tendencies is a BEHAVIOURAL TRAIT! THAT IS NOT PART OF A DOG"S DNA. DNA or genetics would mean every single dog would have that identifiable trait not some.
When animals are bred for certain desireable traits its called selective breeding and it doesn't assure any breeder of having that particular behaviour present in every pup. So over time the most aggressive, best fighting dogs are bred in hopes of an aggressive pup. That's a learned trait.
Put it this way and see if that small minded know it all dolt airportis can even understand it. Racing thoroughbreds such as Secretariat are/were bred with other Arabian quarter horses for years because they want more race horses. Do all the foals come out and race? No, they don't, however if they had a GENETIC TRAIT TO RACE EVERY SINGLE FUCKUNG FOAL WOULD BE A RACE HORSE! They don't, they are bred for their physical attributes which may lend themselves to faster running speeds. That's called selective breeding and the resultant horse that displays the desired tendency to run is then taught to race. They aren't all born to run. Which is also why winning horses aren't fucking cloned instead of bred, because their is no specific and identifiable gene for either behaviour. That's it, it's a very simple concept.
Yes some dogs are bred because they display aggression. Ask ANY BREEDER IF THAT ASSURES THEM OF AGRESSIVE PUPS. A genetic trait such as the smashed in face of a pug is in their DNA, their shitty attitude towards other dogs is not. It's a very simple, HIGHLY PUBLISHED AND STUDIED FACT.
All you have to do is type it in to google and read away.
Once again Airportis, I'm right and you're wrong. Now that, is in our DNA.
Hope this helps,
FDC
Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk