- Aug 24, 2006
- 17,263
- 97
- 0
if you felt that way then why create a thread and bring him more attention?
Try to leave Vinny alone. He gets pissed off when people use performance enhancing drugs to gain an edge except when he pops a viagra.
if you felt that way then why create a thread and bring him more attention?
:mj07:Try to leave Vinny alone. He gets pissed off when people use performance enhancing drugs to gain an edge except when he pops a viagra.
sponge I told you to keep that private, you know my wife reads this board, if she see's this she will stop bringing home those college chicks :00x25
I don't like Barry, Baseball, OR abc....but hey to each his own!
Who snagged the ball?
barry bonds (possibly like ken caminiti) may not live to see fifty...it`s possible...
i wouldn't be suprised if we see a die off of the steroid era players(football/baseball...ala wrestling) within the next five to ten years.....individuals can only abuse their bodies so much before they give out....
it will be interesting to see if he gives up the 'roids when he retires from baseball ....maybe he'll do a mark mcgwire, and lose 80 pounds of muscle in a year and be almost unrecognizable....
i`d wager that mcguire`s testicles must be the size and consistency of raisinettes.......
i have no evidence regarding the mcgwire/raisinette coulume comment...but,i`ll ask spongy...
...yes,it`s conjecture......but,rooted in factual data...
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2004-03-12-wrestling-list_x.htm
http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/2002/0528/1387969.html
http://www.drugabuse.gov/ResearchReports/Steroids/AnabolicSteroids.html
it`s pretty much common knowledge that, certainly in baseball,and probably in football,steroid use has been increasing over,at least the past decade....
you can argue that guys like bonds/mcgwire/sosa/palmeiro/canseco/ and peripheral guys like brady anderson(50 home runs..lol) and another fairly obscure oriole,jay gibbons who looked like a middle linebacker early in his career and now looks normal and coincidentally can`t hit his way out of a paper bag,have never used performance enhancing drugs.....
we can argue that point...i won`t argue that bonds had great natural ability and is a hall of famer whether he`d juiced or not.....
still,he` never was a 60 /755 homer guy until he started looking like steve reeves....around age 36....how many guys peak athletically between ages 36 and 42?...
after age 36 the guy had years in which he hit 45 hr`s in 390 at bats and 46 hrs in 403 at bats......those nagging injuries can kill a guy....
if you`re buying that some dude slipped him steroids under the guise of flaxseed oil?....o.k...you`re entitled...
but,i had a bobby bonds bobble head back in 95`......now,it`s anatomically correct.... i don`t know how that happens....
i guess only time will tell...
NEW YORK (AP) -- Matt Murphy could become $500,000 richer if he sells Barry Bonds' record-breaking home run ball.
The college student, however, may just want to hang on to it -- even if he's hit with a whopping tax bill.
"Part of me wants to keep it. It's the greatest American sports accomplishment in history," Murphy said Thursday on NBC's "Today Show." "Part of me might want to sell it, but I really am leaning towards keeping it. It's just too valuable, sentimental."
Selling the ball for that amount would instantly put Murphy in the highest tax bracket for individual income, where he would face a tax rate of about 35 percent, or about $210,000 on a $600,000 ball.
Even if he does not sell the ball, Murphy would still owe the taxes :scared based on a reasonable estimate of its value, according to John Barrie, a tax lawyer with Bryan Cave LLP in New York. Capital gains taxes also could be levied in the future as the ball gains value, he said.
NEW YORK (AP) -- Matt Murphy could become $500,000 richer if he sells Barry Bonds' record-breaking home run ball.
The college student, however, may just want to hang on to it -- even if he's hit with a whopping tax bill.
"Part of me wants to keep it. It's the greatest American sports accomplishment in history," Murphy said Thursday on NBC's "Today Show." "Part of me might want to sell it, but I really am leaning towards keeping it. It's just too valuable, sentimental."
Selling the ball for that amount would instantly put Murphy in the highest tax bracket for individual income, where he would face a tax rate of about 35 percent, or about $210,000 on a $600,000 ball.
Even if he does not sell the ball, Murphy would still owe the taxes :scared based on a reasonable estimate of its value, according to John Barrie, a tax lawyer with Bryan Cave LLP in New York. Capital gains taxes also could be levied in the future as the ball gains value, he said.
"Part of me wants to keep it. It's the greatest American sports accomplishment in history," Murphy said Thursday on NBC's "Today Show." "Part of me might want to sell it, but I really am leaning towards keeping it. It's just too valuable, sentimental."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.