CLASSIC NEO CON THINKINGS

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
KOD - you are a fool's fool. You label me a parrot yet all you do is vomit words onto a screen that you have copied from an article that you used Google to find!

hahaha.

Either you are stupid, ignorant or both. I hope it is ignorance.

You think I parrot Rush? Perhaps Rush and I have some similar thoughts but I could not even tell you his radio station in my market. I do not listen to talk radio or watch TV talk shows.

Did you miss the point about what 'insurance' really is - you are protecting yourself from a FUTURE calamity. FUTURE - (it means sometime ahead of NOW). You can't insure a house against a fire once the house has already burned down.

I think you just glossed over that statement because it was inconvenient to you.

You are exactly the voter that Obama wants. In fact, you probably got a shiver up your leg when you watched the video that Skulnick posted.

I actually envy you in a small way - you really have no concept of what is going on around you and live in your little bubble utopia. You are happy in the reality that you have created and until it all falls apart, you will know no difference.

Good luck.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
'It's Dirty Work And It's Often Demeaning Work, But At Least It's Work'

Vanessa Powell, 29, works full-time in a Goodwill warehouse in Seattle for $9.25 an hour. She holds a bachelor's degree in English and a master's in business administration.

I now work at Goodwill Industries as a production associate. Basically, I work in a warehouse. I make $9.25 an hour, and it covers almost all the bills. I still am racking up a deficit every month. I'm definitely trying to find another job because I have an MBA.

I went to the University of Alaska for my undergraduate, and I remember trying to get out of Alaska for a long time. I got my undergraduate in English, but there's not a market in English majors, I'm afraid. So I switched over to my master's in business and moved south.

I bike a mile and a half into my job. And I work a full eight-hour shift, which involves tons and tons of books -- we move about one metric ton of books a day. Sorting through all of them, going through the donations and pricing them, putting them on the shelves.

I feel it's sort of -- I hate to say it -- beneath me, but at the same time, I'm grateful. For anything. I mean, yeah, it's dirty work and often demeaning work, but at least it's work.

My fianc? recently lost his job -- that's one less income. Even though he only worked part-time, it was still something. I make enough to cover rent and electric, but we share a cell phone, which is why it's kind of hard for both of us to search for jobs.

Getting enough food is the biggest challenge. We roll our pennies together and try to make the food stretch until the food stamps are loaded back on the card.

I haven't bought new clothes for myself in two years. I can't even remember the last time we went to the movies. We stopped going out a long time ago. I want to say a year and a half was the last time we went out. I haven't seen my friends in about six months because I can't afford to go out with them, and they all want to go out.

We couldn't afford an apartment, so we rented a room in a house. Because I do landscaping for our landlord, he gives us a discount on the rent. And we have our own space cordoned off. So after I bike home from my shift, I try to do about an hour of landscaping and house maintenance, so that we can afford the place.

We've been looking for a new place for ages. It's 400 square feet. Most of our stuff is outside in the rain because we can't get it into the apartment. But anything that's unessential has to go out there.

So things like spare linens are out in the rain, but it's not like I'll have guests anyway. I haven't invited people over in two years. I can't. There'd be no place for them to stand, no place for them to sit. It's far too small.

I've just learned to get by with less. I'd like to be able to afford vices, like even just a drink. I'd buy a couple new books. I'd probably invest money in taking care of my animals. They go to the doctor's more than I do. I really miss being able to go to the doctor.

For the most part, my coworkers joke about what it would be like to to make a living wage and fantasize about what it would be like to cover all the bills. And we laugh at the sort of things we'd do. It should be frivolous, but it's often serious, like buy a new pair of shoes that don't have holes in them. You have to really just laugh about it because otherwise you start crying.

On my breaks, I generally read books I get from the library. My days off are spent searching for different jobs. When I get home at night, I try to work on my writing once I'm done with chores, usually while I'm eating dinner.

I know that I'm probably not going to be able to retire until I'm 70. I've not been able to put away for retirement, much less buy health insurance, so if I live long enough, I'm probably going to be working until my dying day.

I hope to eventually start working a job where I make more than the minimum possible amount. Enough where maybe I can get an electric wheel on my bike because I have arthritis in my hip and it's getting harder to take the hills.\
.................................................................................................


Rand Paul comes out and screams at this lady.... get a fucking job ,moocher .... or two jobs

the gop will reduce your food stamps to nada and see how you like that beech with a Masters !
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Lumi


lighten up with the proof


I know its funny the way they think , but its true


pity really

So you were just editorializing
With what you think he might say?

You made the statement that Rand Paul said....
I searched for it, it's just not there

Are you quoting the Democratic Underground, HuffPo,
TPM or another Soros funded op?
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
So you were just editorializing
With what you think he might say?

You made the statement that Rand Paul said....
I searched for it, it's just not there

Are you quoting the Democratic Underground, HuffPo,
TPM or another Soros funded op?
.........................................................................................


ssd made no attempt to qualify his if you get in a car wreck insurance blah blah

but he obviously heard one of the fox clan say it

so whats the differance . And I didnt say he said it I said he screamed it ...big diff
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
So the answer is no, you cannot provide proof?

Screaming, saying, morse code ...
He in no way verbalized or transmitted that statement
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
So the answer is no, you cannot provide proof?

Screaming, saying, morse code ...
He in no way verbalized or transmitted that statement

Lumi

did you know there are machines available now that read thoughts. I got one for Christmas.

I have been using it on Rand and Cruz :shrug:


It seems simple enough

so do you feel at all sorry for the people in the storys ?

You do not believe that Rand could possibly feel way ?


huh
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane

DOW


16,294.61


+73.47

+0.45%



NASDAQ


4,148.90


+44.16

+1.08%

....................................................................................................................................


Wow Economy really picking up

If Romney was in WH it would be ooooo ooooo ooooo looky here

Obama - what a man

Obama - what a President

Obama - Thanks to Jesus he won and have a happy Christmas
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Lumi

did you know there are machines available now that read thoughts. I got one for Christmas.

I have been using it on Rand and Cruz :shrug:


It seems simple enough

so do you feel at all sorry for the people in the storys ?

You do not believe that Rand could possibly feel way ?


huh


I had to put the thought reader machine on layaway
My kids come first on Christmas

I guess it's possible that RP feels that way?

But being that I have been paying attention
To him, since his beginning into politics, and his father
For over 20 years, I just don't see him exhibiting that
Type of behavior

You like to portray yourself as a watchdog
By copy and paste these articles. I get it
I do the same. What I don't do is make suppositions
And create falsehoods of what someone might say

And yes, I do have empathy for the people in
These threads who are stuck at the bottom rung
What I am more concerned about is the Ryan/Murray
Bill that passed both houses that FUCKS the Veterans
And Active Duty Troops
A fresh boot. E1 makes about 18 K a year, way below
The poverty line. He gets about 400 a month for housing,
Troops have a difficult time getting public assistance
The housing they receive on post is substandard
They come home, treated like shit by the VA and are labeled
Terrorists by Homeland Security. That's not a supposition
That's a fact

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
1. centrist - supporting or pursuing a course of action that is neither liberal nor conservative

supporting or pursuing a course of action that is neither liberal nor conservative
middle-of-the-road

center - of or belonging to neither the right nor the left politically or intellectually

...................................................................................................................


this is me



go too far left in politics and your a idiot

go too far right in politics and your insane
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Unemployment Benefits Can Be 'The Difference Between Making It And Not Making It'
Posted: 12/24/2013 8:37 am EST | Updated: 12/24/2013 11:16 am EST

Share on Google+


PHOENIXVILLE, Pa. -- Charlie Walker was working from home one day last January when he got a call from his manager, who had already assembled several other senior employees in his office.

"I can't remember exactly how he said it -- change of business conditions or whatever else -- long story short: you're out of here," Walker, 55, said in an interview. He'd worked for the business-to-business publisher for 11 years. "Everyone else was in the office because they were able to pull them in. I got laid off by phone."

He didn't know how to react. His 6-year-old daughter, Emmalee, had been playing with dolls on the floor of their two-story home in this Philadelphia suburb while her father got fired.

"I hang up the phone and I look at her and say -- she doesn't know these things -- and I said, 'I just lost my job,'" he said. He immediately wished he hadn't burdened his daughter.

The next thing he did was call his wife, Andrea, so they could begin downscaling their lifestyle. No more restaurants, no new winter coat, no more zero balance on the credit cards. Since then, between her job with a local government agency that serves senior citizens and his roughly $300 per week in unemployment benefits, they've been able to juggle their expenses.

"The unemployment wasn't that much, but it made the difference," Andrea Walker said.

The benefits are at an end. Congress skipped town for the holidays without reauthorizing federal unemployment insurance, which is available to workers after they use up the usual six months of benefits provided by states -- which Charlie Walker has done. Next Saturday, he will be among more than 1 million workers whose federal benefits prematurely expire.


Democrats have made a lot of noise about reinstating the benefits in January, but Republicans have been quiet. It's unclear whether proposals to reauthorize the compensation for a year, or even just three months, will win enough support to pass when Congress reconvenes.

A reauthorization would give the Walkers at least another couple months of help. Jobless workers in Pennsylvania have been eligible for 63 weeks of combined state and federal assistance. Charlie Walker is one of 73,330 Pennsylvanians whose economic lifeline will stop short.

"It was the difference between making it and not making it," Walker said. "It wasn't enough to pay all the bills, but it was enough to make it."

At first, little Emmalee didn't understand what it meant that her dad had lost his job. "She thought maybe I'd misplaced it," he said. But eventually, as her father's jobless spell dragged through spring and into a summer, during which they couldn't afford to fix their broken air conditioning system, Emmalee began to grasp the meaning of unemployment. After Halloween, as the holiday season approached, she asked her father what it would mean for her.

"She looked up at me and said, 'Daddy, are we still going to have Christmas this year?' Talk about taking your heart out and stomping on it."

It's a heartstomper that shows the agonizing process of transforming from someone who just got laid off into someone who economists recognize as one of the "long-term unemployed" -- people out of work at least a half-year. There were more than 4 million Americans who had crossed the six-month mark as of November, and more than 1 million were jobless longer than 99 weeks. In the past half-century, no other recession has had so much prolonged joblessness.

Studies have shown that the longer someone is out of work, the less likely they are to get hired. Walker is keenly aware that some employers just don't want to hire people who seem unwanted.

"The more I read about people in my situation -- middle-aged, liberal arts [background], out of work more than six months -- the odds of someone who meets those demographics coming up with a traditional 9-to-5 office job are miniscule," he said.

But he is a man willing to adapt. He's sought liberal-artsy writing jobs, but also stuff way beneath his pay grade, including some non-managerial positions with Barnes & Noble. In August, he said he had a temporary position editing a website for Temple University. He's continuing to seek a regular office job, but takes contract work when he can, figuring entrepreneurship might be unemployment's only escape.

When he neared the six-month mark of joblessness, his wife suggested he cut his ponytail and shave his soul patch. He resisted, arguing people should accept the fact that he likes the Grateful Dead. But just like he did when he quit smoking so that Andrea would marry him, just like when he went vegetarian for the good of his heart, he did what he had to do.

"It's a small price to pay for employment," Walker said.

Nevertheless, it's hard to cope with the indignity of prolonged joblessness. Walker said he put himself through college by working nights at a newspaper copy desk, and he's unused to this kind of struggle.

"I've always been proud of that and now that sense of self-worth isn't there," he said. "Not only that, but the rejection that has come with it. Andrea cautions me. After an interview I will be so sky-high because it went so well. And now she has seen me enough times go down in flames and she tells me."

"Don't get your hopes up," she said. "It's horrible to say but ?"

"But I do. I work so hard for the interviews."

"He gets so excited, [saying] 'This is the one!' And he starts making dreams, like we're gonna do this and this when I get the job."

Charlie Walker isn't the only one forced to take the occasional cold shower. The Walkers' water heater has been on the fritz since last week. Instead of paying the utility company to come and replace it, Walker is going to buy one from Home Depot and put it in himself. His dad is going to help.

"This model we're buying is easy to install, I looked at these reviews online and he's good at this kind of stuff," Walker said. "It's gonna save $1,200. An 80-year-old man is gonna come help me and we're gonna save $1,200 and we're gonna have hot water."

They're gonna have Christmas, too. Even though they have no way to know whether Walker will get a job or will have any income from unemployment insurance next year, the Walkers deemed Christmas a necessity for their daughter. That's what Charlie Walker told Emmalee when she asked if Christmas would be canceled.

"There is nothing that would stop Christmas," he said
........................................................................................................


Lumi screamed out after reading this


eat shit and die moochers

if you cant afford Christmas then dont have Christmas

Get a job

dont depend on the goverment to give you further unemployment !

when the going gets tough you know the rest

oh and vote Rand and Teddy in the next election, that is if you make it that far
and arent homeless by then moocherman
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
What I am more concerned about is the Ryan/Murray
Bill that passed both houses that FUCKS the Veterans
And Active Duty Troops
A fresh boot. E1 makes about 18 K a year, way below
The poverty line. He gets about 400 a month for housing,
Troops have a difficult time getting public assistance
The housing they receive on post is substandard
They come home, treated like shit by the VA and are labeled
Terrorists by Homeland Security. That's not a supposition
That's a fact

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/


maybe if the neo cons hadnt gotten us into two Trillion dollar wars for the last 15 yrs we would have
the money to make it better for vets.

you can say Obama also stayed the course in a way. But my belief is that he had no choice in what
had to be done in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is such a waste. Bring home the rest of the 40 K men and woman there as soon as possible. Get them out of that hellhole
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Twas was the night before Christmas and all through house.
The Tea Party was frightened just like a mouse.
The "Fear Industry" was bold just like they should.
Because the Tea Party would listen as hard as they could.
They keep them so scared, they don't know fact from lies.
They keep them watching, so they don't know their own demise.
The time will come when they will realize, 2014 is on the horizon !!!
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
do you have proof of this Lumi


wtf

It was phrased as a question

A question is used as an inquiry for information that is unknown

Being that most of the shit bricks are under the legal
Voting age, a political affiliation has yet to have been established

My guess is, if they live long enough to the voting age,
They are potential Dems
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
A new American intelligence assessment on the Afghan war predicts that the gains the United States and its allies have made during the past three years are likely to have been significantly eroded by 2017, even if Washington leaves behind a few thousand troops and continues bankrolling the impoverished nation, according to officials familiar with the report.

The National Intelligence Estimate, which includes input from the country?s 16 intelligence agencies, predicts that the Taliban and other power brokers will become increasingly influential as the United States winds down its longest war in history, according to officials who have read the classified report or received briefings on its conclusions. The grim outlook is fueling a policy debate inside the Obama administration about the steps it should take over the next year as the U.S. military draws down its remaining troops.



The report predicts that Afghanistan would likely descend into chaos quickly if Washington and Kabul don?t sign a security pact that would keep an international military contingent there beyond 2014 ? a precondition for the delivery of billions of dollars in aid that the United States and its allies have pledged to spend in Afghanistan over the coming years.

?In the absence of a continuing presence and continuing financial support,? the intelligence assessment ?suggests the situation would deteriorate very rapidly,? said one U.S. official familiar with the report.

That conclusion is widely shared among U.S. officials working on Afghanistan, said the official, who was among five people familiar with the report who agreed to speak on the condition of anonymity to discuss the assessment.

Some officials have taken umbrage at the underlying pessimism in the report, arguing that it does not adequately reflect how strong Afghanistan?s security forces have become. One American official, who described the NIE as ?more dark? than past intelligence assessments on the war, said there are too many uncertainties to make an educated prediction on how the conflict will unfold between now and 2017, chief among them the outcome of next year?s presidential election.

?I think what we?re going to see is a recalibration of political power, territory and that kind of thing,? said one U.S. official who felt the assessment was unfairly negative. ?It?s not going to be an inevitable rise of the Taliban.?

A senior administration official said that the intelligence community has long underestimated Afghanistan?s security forces.

?An assessment that says things are going to be gloomy no matter what you do, that you?re just delaying the inevitable, that?s just a view,? said the official. ?I would not think it would be the determining view.?

U.S. intelligence analysts did not provide a detailed mapping of areas they believe are likely to become controlled by specific groups or warlords in coming years, said one of the officials. But the analysts anticipate that the central government in Kabul is all but certain to become increasingly irrelevant as it loses ?purchase? over parts of the country, the official said.

...................................................................................................

wonderful job George W and President Cheney


80% of America knew that as soon as we pulled out after 12 or however many years the Taliban would come down from the hills and bomb and kill again.

nothing accplished but to feed the American military machine

nothing accomplished but how many dead military men and woman. and countless afghan ppl

Guess we should wind it up and get ready for Iran


Israel is sure to start something soon that they cant finish.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said he is now taking steps to officially renounce his Canadian citizenship.

In an interview with the Dallas Morning News published Saturday, the freshman senator said he hoped to complete the legal procedure in 2014.

?I have retained counsel that is preparing the paperwork to renounce the citizenship," Cruz said.

Cruz released his birth certificate to the Morning News in August in an effort to curb speculation that he is not a natural born citizen (and therefore ineligible to run for president in the U.S.). However, the newspaper pointed out that the circumstances of Cruz's birth -- he was born in Calgary, Alberta to an American mother -- meant he likely retained citizenship in both the U.S. and Canada.

"Now the Dallas Morning News says that I may technically have dual citizenship," Cruz said in a statement. "Assuming that is true, then sure, I will renounce any Canadian citizenship. Nothing against Canada, but I'm an American by birth and as a U.S. senator; I believe I should be only an American."

Cruz, who was first elected to the Senate last fall, has stoked speculation that he will run for president in 2016 by making appearances in early primary states and courting major GOP donors at fundraisers.

However, in the Morning News interview, Cruz denied that his decision to renounce his citizenship had any implications for his political future.
..................................................................................................................


oh no ya don't Cruz


Once a Canuck always a Canuck


He should be vetted with this birth cert shit until the crows come home to roost.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
At this time of the year, it is not unusual to receive various mailings from nonprofit organizations looking for crucial end-of-the-year donations. You can imagine my surprise when I received a request from a certain notorious former President of the United States asking for my financial support in his public policy center's efforts to address the "challenges facing our world."

My response to this solicitation is below.

***
Dear Mr. Bush:

A few days ago I received a personalized letter from your Presidential Center which included a solicitation card for donations that actually provided words for my reply. They included "I'm honored to help tell the story of the Bush Presidency" and "I'm thrilled that the Bush Institute is advancing timeless principles and practical solutions to the challenges facing our world." (Below were categories of "tax-deductible contributions" starting with $25 and going upward.)

Did you mean the "timeless principles" that drove you and Mr. Cheney to invade the country of Iraq which, contrary to your fabrications, deceptions and cover-ups, never threatened the United States? Nor could Iraq (under its dictator and his dilapidated military) threaten its far more powerful neighbors, even if the Iraqi regime wanted to do so.

Today, Iraq remains a country (roughly the size and population of Texas) you destroyed, a country where over a million Iraqis, including many children and infants (remember Fallujah?) lost their lives, millions more were sickened or injured, and millions more were forced to become refugees, including most of the Iraqi Christians. Iraq is a country rife with sectarian strife that your prolonged invasion provoked into what is now open warfare. Iraq is a country where al-Qaeda is spreading with explosions taking 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 lives per day. Just this week, it was reported that the U.S. has sent Hellfire air-to-ground missiles to Iraq's air force to be used against encampments of "the country's branch of al Qaeda." There was no al Qaeda in Iraq before your invasion. Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein were mortal enemies.

The Bush/Cheney sociocide of Iraq, together with the loss of tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers' lives, countless injuries and illnesses, registers, with the passage of time, no recognition by you that you did anything wrong nor have you accepted responsibility for the illegality of your military actions without a Congressional declaration of war. You even turned your back on Iraqis who worked with U.S. military occupation forces as drivers, translators etc. at great risk to themselves and their families and were desperately requesting visas to the U.S., often with the backing of U.S. military personnel. Your administration allowed fewer Iraqis into the U.S. than did Sweden in that same period and far, far fewer than Vietnamese refugees coming to the U.S. during the nineteen seventies.

When you were a candidate, I called you a corporation running for the presidency masquerading as a human being. In time you turned a metaphor into a reality. As a corporation, you express no remorse, no shame, no compassion and a resistance to admit anything other than that you have done nothing wrong.

Day after day Iraqis, including children, continue to die or suffer terribly. When the paraplegic, U.S. army veteran, Tomas Young, wrote you last year seeking some kind of recognition that many things went horribly criminal for many American soldiers and Iraqis, you did not deign to reply, as you did not deign to reply to Cindy Sheehan, who lost her son, Casey, in Iraq. As you said, "the interesting thing about being the president" is that you "don't feel like [you] owe anybody an explanation." As a former President, nothing has changed as you make very lucrative speeches before business groups and, remarkably, ask Americans for money to support your "continued work in public service."

Pollsters have said that they believe a majority of Iraqis would say that life today is worse for them than under the brutal dictatorship of Saddam Hussein. They would also say George W. Bush left Iraq worse off than when he entered it, despite the U.S. led sanctions prior to 2003 that took so many lives of Iraqi children and damaged the health of so many civilian families.

Your national security advisor, Condoleezza Rice, said publicly in 2012 that while "the arc of history" may well turn out better for post-invasion Iraq than the present day violent chaos, she did "take personal responsibility" for the casualties and the wreckage. Do you?

Can you, at the very least, publicly urge the federal government to admit more civilian Iraqis, who served in the U.S. military occupation, to this country to escape the retaliation that has been visited on their similarly-situated colleagues? Isn't that the minimum you can do to very slightly lessen the multiple, massive blowbacks that your reckless military policies have caused? It was your own anti-terrorism White House adviser, Richard Clarke, who wrote in his book, Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror, soon after leaving his post, that the U.S. played right into Osama bin Laden's hands by invading Iraq.

Are you privately pondering what your invasion of Iraq did to the Iraqis and American military families, the economy and to the spread of al Qaeda attacks in numerous countries?

Sincerely yours,

Ralph Nader

P.S. I am enclosing as a contribution in kind to your presidential center library the book Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions by Clyde Prestowitz (2003) whom I'm sure you know. Note the positive remark on the back cover by General Wesley Clark.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
The Earth?s climate is immensely complex, but the basic principle behind the ?greenhouse effect? is easy to understand. The burning of oil, gas, and especially coal pumps carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere, where they allow the sun?s heat to penetrate to the Earth?s surface but impede its escape, thus causing the lower atmosphere and the Earth?s surface to warm. Essentially everybody, Lindzen included, agrees. The question at issue is how sensitive the planet is to increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (this is called climate sensitivity), and how much the planet will heat up as a result of our pumping into the sky ever more CO2, which remains in the atmosphere for upwards of 1,000 years. (Carbon dioxide, it may be needless to point out, is not a poison. On the contrary, it is necessary for plant life.)

Lindzen doesn?t deny that the climate has changed or that the planet has warmed. ?We all agree that temperature has increased since 1800,? he tells me. There?s a caveat, though: It?s increased by ?a very small amount. We?re talking about tenths of a degree [Celsius]. We all agree that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. All other things kept equal, [there has been] some warming. As a result, there?s hardly anyone serious who says that man has no role. And in many ways, those have never been the questions. The questions have always been, as they ought to be in science, how much??

Lindzen says not much at all?and he contends that the ?alarmists? vastly overstate the Earth?s climate sensitivity. Judging by where we are now, he appears to have a point; so far, 150 years of burning fossil fuels in large quantities has had a relatively minimal effect on the climate. By some measurements, there is now more CO2 in the atmosphere than there has been at any time in the past 15 million years. Yet since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, the average global temperature has risen by, at most, 1 degree Celsius, or 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit. And while it?s true that sea levels have risen over the same period, it?s believed they?ve been doing so for roughly 20,000 years. What?s more, despite common misconceptions stoked by the media in the wake of Katrina, Sandy, and the recent typhoon in the Philippines, even the IPCC concedes that it has ?low confidence? that there has been any measurable uptick in storm intensity thanks to human activity. Moreover, over the past 15 years, as man has emitted record levels of carbon dioxide year after year, the warming trend of previous decades has stopped. Lindzen says this is all consistent with what he holds responsible for climate change: a small bit of man-made impact and a whole lot of natural variability.

The real fight, though, is over what?s coming in the future if humans continue to burn fossil fuels unabated. According to the IPCC, the answer is nothing good. Its most recent Summary for Policymakers, which was released early this fall?and which some scientists reject as too sanguine?predicts that if emissions continue to rise, by the year 2100, global temperatures could increase as much as 5.5 degrees Celsius from current averages, while sea levels could rise by nearly a meter. If we hit those projections, it?s generally thought that the Earth would be rife with crop failures, drought, extreme weather, and epochal flooding. Adios, Miami.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top