Palehose said::mj07: :mj07: Yet every vote you cast makes the ACLU and PETA stronger !!! :mj07: :mj07:
Spin your wheels much ???? :s4:
Well, in the case of Palehose's penis - I reckon God did.MrChristo said:Or did God just leave a little appendage there with no real purpose....
MrChristo said:We can teach them, that 2% of people are wierd and strange and therefore elect homosexuality
Yes, most people choose homosexuality because they are weird and strange.
Can someone please close the barn door....
Munson said:I just wish that I was born later in time...a time later when humans evolve enough to stop believing in fairy tales.
JCDunkDogs said:Great thread!
Clarence Darrow aside, nearly every debator advocating evolution loses to the debator advocating creationism. Its not because the evolutionist is wrong, nor the creationist right, but rather because:
1) the hard science that is necessary to explain evolution is too darn boring to hold the audiences' interest, and
2) the evolutionist ends up arguing that, "we haven't found the fossil evidence, yet."
Maybe one day we will. But it will never end the debate in some people's minds. My own opinion? I believe that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
djv said:Why do all these religions keep begging for more money. Does anyone think there really was a garden of evil.
Nick Douglas said:Godwin's Law is gonna hit this thread any time now...
For those geniuses doubting the facts behind evolution, a good place to start is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
Other than that, there's probably darn near a thousand publications and hundreds of examples detailing the proof that various species have evolved from other forms of life. There is no positive proof whatsoever of Creationism (i.e., Intelligent Design), nor does there need to be in my opinion. And by the way, not having a 100% proven scientific explanation of something does not "prove" creationism in any way or make it part of science.
As for attacking Christians and Christmas, you people need to get a life. First of all many of the people making loads of cash from this ficticious assault have simply made things up to prove their point. I don't have any desire to research the examples given in this thread, but something tells me whoever posted them got them directly from some conservative news outlet. I highly doubt the poster was affected by these things first hand.
The more overall disturbing trend is that I feel like more and more bitter old people want to live in a theocracy. In general I think allowing the majority to express their religion in a reserved, respectful way in public space is a positive thing. But jeez, when you see the way these zealots react to any tiny little perceived affront to their desired way of life, it's hard to see them as anything but bigoted old blowhards.
kosar said:You really crack yourself up, don't you.
I'll bite. How does every vote I cast make the ACLU and PETA stronger?
Before you start your dumbass argument, keep in mind that I don't vote strictly for one party or another(not that it makes any difference in this case to begin with). Ok, go ahead.
Palehose said:Simple you vote Democrat at least mostly
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.