- Feb 12, 2000
- 10,652
- 39
- 48
- 50
I would agree Chad if all the above were intent to pad handicap of player when handicap is pertinent--however most pad handicap the opposite way (higher than reality).
I would not consider most of above cheating --where you have all players agree on alterations.
Cheating is defined as -deception for profit to yourself .
There is no deception if all agee.
IMO Cheating would knowingly giving wrong score--claiming one found their ball when they know it isn't theirs-dropping one-and such things.
I play game however those I am playing with want to play--some mulligan off 1st tee--some play it up--some give in the leather--and some play strictly by the rulles. I certainly don't consider myself a cheater because I try to be cordial with fellow players. Granted I could play by rules even though they don't but would not be worth risk of maybe giving them impression I thought lesser of them because they didn't.
100% agree. If the said group has agreed upon rules (I don't give a damn if it's that they can tee off from the ladies' tees), then where is the cheating. Are you cheating the beloved game? **** that.
I love golf. What I don't love are the blow-hard know-it-all wanna-bes or has beens. If you're a prick about it, just remember being a 3-5 handicap is equivilent to being the guy at the local gym that dominates pick up basketball but couldn't quite make the cut when trying to play college ball.
So if "in the leather" is an agreement for your game, it is simply NOT cheating.
If you break the rules that are agreed upon or make up any mid-round when nobody's looking for your convenience, you will probably not be welcome to play in the group again anytime soon.
But what do I know? I'm a 5 round per year, gimmie taken if given, play two of the first tee if somebody says it, beer on the course HACK!
Can't wait to cheat you worthless wrecks on August 2nd!
Can I be on Agent's team?

