Lang has biggest play of year on Florida

[Destructor D]

I have UNC :facepalm: :sadwave: :scared :scared

Brandon Lang is the epitomy of a LOSER!

Maybe I should just back up the vault and put everything on Kentucky... Lang is King of the Squares as well and every square will be taking UNC today, every single one of them along with me. Well even the squares win 30% of the time so maybe we'll be lucky today.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

so true..... He truly is an assest though.. Just fade away... Someone should call him and say, "Hey, let me kick ya in the teeth, (so maybe time at the dentist will prevent him from costing more suckers money; {doing your charitable part to help strangers}) take half of what you were gonna LOSE FOR SURE TODAY, and call it a day"

When are some of you going to learn? Fading is not profitable in any form. If someone has no skill they are going to settle at the 50% mark long-term. So who cares?

:facepalm:

 

[ppabart]

I have UNC :facepalm: :sadwave: :scared :scared

Brandon Lang is the epitomy of a LOSER!

Maybe I should just back up the vault and put everything on Kentucky... Lang is King of the Squares as well and every square will be taking UNC today, every single one of them along with me. Well even the squares win 30% of the time so maybe we'll be lucky today.

Even shitty dart throwers hit the bullseye once in a while though

Let's hope today is his bullseye

 

[Jaxx]

When are some of you going to learn? Fading is not profitable in any form. If someone has no skill they are going to settle at the 50% mark long-term. So who cares?

:facepalm:

Wrong

:mj07:

 

[Destructor D]

"When are some of you going to learn? Fading is not profitable in any form. If someone has no skill they are going to settle at the 50% mark long-term. So who cares?"

Nice post Trampled Foot, you obviously don't know the power of fading the worst handicapper in the world aka Brandon Lang. He won't ever hit 50% and the larger his play, the more you should wager the other way. :violin:

 

[Nole]

When are some of you going to learn? Fading is not profitable in any form. If someone has no skill they are going to settle at the 50% mark long-term. So who cares?

:facepalm:

:facepalm:




No, not if they suck.

 

[yyz]

Remember when in doubt, give yourself an extra point or two.

+2 1/2 really> that line doesnt exist and never has at least to this point. But I suppose if youre betting a pretend 30 dimes you can use a pretend line to do it.

:0corn

Maybe he uses Bound's Book?

 

[BasketballNut]

everybody hitting 50% long-term, at worst, is a myth

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

"When are some of you going to learn? Fading is not profitable in any form. If someone has no skill they are going to settle at the 50% mark long-term. So who cares?"

Nice post Trampled Foot, you obviously don't know the power of fading the worst handicapper in the world aka Brandon Lang. He won't ever hit 50% and the larger his play, the more you should wager the other way. :violin:

You guys keep telling that to yourselves. Think about it. If you have no skill, it is the equivalent of flipping a coin. Anything can happen over a small sample size. I'm talking about long term. I don't care about what happens over the next 100 plays. Seriously if you guys are throwing a dime on a play just because this guy says take the other side, you will eventually go broke. As much as I love to mock some of the squares on here, I would never bet the opposite of what they play for that reason. It shouldn't even factor into the decision. Just look around on this board and see who is convinced this works. That alone should convince you even if you aren't a genius with probabilities.

 

[BasketballNut]

Lang has been tracked over thousands of plays

you will make money fading him. It's documented.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Lang has been tracked over thousands of plays

you will make money fading him. It's documented.

Uh huh. Good luck.

 

[BasketballNut]

yep you're wrong, and you look dumb to all of the people that know what im talking about


good luck yourself

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

yep you're wrong, and you look dumb to all of the people that know what im talking about


good luck yourself

You are the one that will need the luck if you think you will profit from fading.

 

[ChuckyTheGoat]

Lang has built a few guys houses, via his fades. That's the truth.

Not guaranteeing that will continue into future, but Lang has sucked at legendary levels. He seriously was in the 42 to 44% range for times.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Lang has built a few guys houses, via his fades. That's the truth.

Not guaranteeing that will continue into future, but Lang has sucked at legendary levels. He seriously was in the 42 to 44% range for times.

If you really believe Lang was in the 42-44 range for years and thousands of plays, I really don't know what to say to you.

 

[SixFive]

:00hour :00hour

 

[DZ]

Trampled, the key to fading Lang is playing the same rediculous unit sizes he bets on every play. It may be true that the guy is a 50/50 "handicapper" but he's one of the worst money managers out there. So if you see he's got his 50 dime "play of the year" on tap, you'd better bet that 50 dimes the other way. They key to fading him is to replicate the poor money management he uses on the other side.

 

[yyz]

Tramp, you can say what you want......but this didn't just start.......and people have been posting it for a very long time, now.

That, in fact, makes it documented.


Also, I believe in the bell curve when it comes to things like this.

You have a vast majority who fall in the middle, or that coin flipping range. A very small pecentage are on either ends. Some guys you know who seem to never lose, and the other guys who seem to never win.

Those guys do exist. They have to, to maintain the curve.

 

[Jaxx]

You guys keep telling that to yourselves. Think about it. If you have no skill, it is the equivalent of flipping a coin. Anything can happen over a small sample size. I'm talking about long term. I don't care about what happens over the next 100 plays. Seriously if you guys are throwing a dime on a play just because this guy says take the other side, you will eventually go broke. As much as I love to mock some of the squares on here, I would never bet the opposite of what they play for that reason. It shouldn't even factor into the decision. Just look around on this board and see who is convinced this works. That alone should convince you even if you aren't a genius with probabilities.

That is just it Tramp. They are not flipping a coin to make plays. They have tendencies and factors that influence the picks. If they were flipping a coin yea simple statistics tell you in the long run it will be very close to 50%. They are not flipping a coin. That makes no sense to you?

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

That is just it Tramp. They are not flipping a coin to make plays. They have tendencies and factors that influence the picks. If they were flipping a coin yea simple statistics tell you in the long run it will be very close to 50%. They are not flipping a coin. That makes no sense to you?

No, it makes no sense. But I will drop it. The more squares out there the better it is for the rest of us really.