I sure hope Stafanski gets a coaching job somewhere
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]() |
![]() | ||
---|---|---|---|
Net Yards Passing | 75 | 117 | |
Comp-Att | 12-17 | 9-16 | |
Yards Per Pass | 3.9 | 6.5 | |
Times Sacked | 2 | 2 | |
Yds Lost To Sacks | 12 | 9 | |
Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 | |
Punts | 4 | 1 | |
Punt Average | 48.5 | 38.0 | |
Penalties | 1 | 4 | |
Penalty Yards | 15 | 33 | |
Fumbles | 1 | 0 | |
Fumbles Lost | 0 | 0 | |
Time of Possession | 00:14:14 | 00:27:01 |
Was this the hall of fame game or a divisional playoff game?
was typical of a divisional playoff game....a bye week team fully rested vs a team coming off a hard fought win .
nothing new or unusual about it..
it's the reason why bye teams get to the Super Bowl so often
was typical of a divisional playoff game....a bye week team fully rested vs a team coming off a hard fought win .
nothing new or unusual about it..
it's the reason why bye teams get to the Super Bowl so often
Hi OS, am not trying to argue with you, but here is something I took from VSIN analysis.
Market Insights: Will divisional dogs have their day again?
By Josh Appelbaum (VSiN.com)
Bettors should keep several trends in the back of their minds this weekend. First off, we tend to see Divisional Round favorites win but not cover. Since 2003, Divisional Round favorites have gone 40-23 straight up (63.5%), but they've only gone 24-38 ATS (39%).
In other words, this is the best round of the playoffs to bet on dogs. According to data from Bet Labs Sports, playoff dogs are 98-77 ATS (56%) since 2003, but they improve to 38-24 ATS (61%) in the Divisional Round. Big playoff dogs plus 7 or more are 36-24 ATS (60%) in all rounds of the playoffs, including 1-0 ATS last week with the Vikings upsetting the Saints as 7.5-point dogs.
Also, it's a common belief that bye weeks provide a big edge to playoff teams due to the added rest and extra time to game-plan. This may be true for winning the game, but not for covering the spread. Teams coming off a bye are just 43-52 ATS (45%) since 2003.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.