IN GAME THREAD MINNESOTA at SAN FRANCISCO

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,523
496
83
74
2019_MIN_wbg.png
2019_SF_wbg.png
Net Yards Passing75117
Comp-Att12-179-16
Yards Per Pass3.96.5
Times Sacked22
Yds Lost To Sacks129
Interceptions Thrown11
Punts41
Punt Average48.538.0
Penalties14
Penalty Yards1533
Fumbles10
Fumbles Lost00
Time of Possession00:14:1400:27:01

<tbody>
</tbody>
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,523
496
83
74
Was this the hall of fame game or a divisional playoff game?

was typical of a divisional playoff game....a bye week team fully rested vs a team coming off a hard fought win .

nothing new or unusual about it..

it's the reason why bye teams get to the Super Bowl so often
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
was typical of a divisional playoff game....a bye week team fully rested vs a team coming off a hard fought win .

nothing new or unusual about it..

it's the reason why bye teams get to the Super Bowl so often

90 yards thru 3 quarters.....just typical playoff football??
 

yanno

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2001
3,555
132
63
Ontario
Hi OS, am not trying to argue with you, but here is something I took from VSIN analysis.

Market Insights: Will divisional dogs have their day again?

By Josh Appelbaum (VSiN.com)

Bettors should keep several trends in the back of their minds this weekend. First off, we tend to see Divisional Round favorites win but not cover. Since 2003, Divisional Round favorites have gone 40-23 straight up (63.5%), but they've only gone 24-38 ATS (39%).

In other words, this is the best round of the playoffs to bet on dogs. According to data from Bet Labs Sports, playoff dogs are 98-77 ATS (56%) since 2003, but they improve to 38-24 ATS (61%) in the Divisional Round. Big playoff dogs plus 7 or more are 36-24 ATS (60%) in all rounds of the playoffs, including 1-0 ATS last week with the Vikings upsetting the Saints as 7.5-point dogs.

Also, it's a common belief that bye weeks provide a big edge to playoff teams due to the added rest and extra time to game-plan. This may be true for winning the game, but not for covering the spread. Teams coming off a bye are just 43-52 ATS (45%) since 2003.


was typical of a divisional playoff game....a bye week team fully rested vs a team coming off a hard fought win .

nothing new or unusual about it..

it's the reason why bye teams get to the Super Bowl so often

That being said, you are talking about getting to the Superbowl, which is about straight up wins, not ATS. So you may be right in saying that.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
54
So. Cal
Hi OS, am not trying to argue with you, but here is something I took from VSIN analysis.

Market Insights: Will divisional dogs have their day again?

By Josh Appelbaum (VSiN.com)

Bettors should keep several trends in the back of their minds this weekend. First off, we tend to see Divisional Round favorites win but not cover. Since 2003, Divisional Round favorites have gone 40-23 straight up (63.5%), but they've only gone 24-38 ATS (39%).

In other words, this is the best round of the playoffs to bet on dogs. According to data from Bet Labs Sports, playoff dogs are 98-77 ATS (56%) since 2003, but they improve to 38-24 ATS (61%) in the Divisional Round. Big playoff dogs plus 7 or more are 36-24 ATS (60%) in all rounds of the playoffs, including 1-0 ATS last week with the Vikings upsetting the Saints as 7.5-point dogs.

Also, it's a common belief that bye weeks provide a big edge to playoff teams due to the added rest and extra time to game-plan. This may be true for winning the game, but not for covering the spread. Teams coming off a bye are just 43-52 ATS (45%) since 2003.


8 first downs

3rd lowest ever in playoff game

Perfect that it comes from this organization
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top