Crockie, the O/U for ATL on Sunday at home
O/U: 1-4-0 (-9.7) avg total: 194.1
That's a nice number around 184...throw in the Lakers and does it make a 16 point difference? Interesting number here.
NBA SUN 03-29-09 Scouting Sides & Observing Overs (NO PICKS INSIDE)
- Thread starter PickNPop
- Start date
Crockie, the O/U for ATL on Sunday at home
O/U: 1-4-0 (-9.7) avg total: 194.1
That's a nice number around 184...throw in the Lakers and does it make a 16 point difference? Interesting number here.
- Mar 19, 2009
- 425
- 0
- 0
This game will likely go under. kobe has a sore ankle and will not shoot the ball great most likely.
He mentioned that he hurt the tendon. Only rest will heal a tendon. he said he will play which could hurt the lakers if he were off. All the lakers players will be looking for him to create a spark and it might not be there. I think this game goes under.
Damn, I love these two plays. I wish I could have gotten in when SAS was still a dog. No love for NJ bro??
- Mar 21, 2009
- 105
- 0
- 0
applying same for Bulls (if I'm correct):
t:team=Bulls and site=away and tP:margin<0 and tP:season=season and tP:site=home and season=2008
Bulls shooting alot, scoring better with Salmons, b2b should imply a bit less D, Raptors playing for homecrowd, running more lately, playing less D lately.
Bulls in playoff hunt, every game is important, staying close is crucial and calls for late fouls.
Seems like solid recepy for over
- Mar 19, 2009
- 425
- 0
- 0
teams playing their fourth game in five days after overtime are 8-40 ATS if this is at least their third straight game with a total higher than their average total.
and 0-16 if not playing in same time zone as last night.
phoenix in very bad situation here.
hought you guys might like this info for a late play. This guy and his system are money lately.
and 0-16 if not playing in same time zone as last night.
phoenix in very bad situation here.
hought you guys might like this info for a late play. This guy and his system are money lately.
This is my only caveat...these Lakers like to try to pad their stats and with Kobe's limited PT...???
With that said, ATL still has their say and they like to keep it under...
Accuscore as of 11:15am Sunday:
Cavs 6.2 and 188
Lakers 2.1 and 196.5
Nets 6.0 and 201.4
Raptors .1 and 205.7
Pistons 4.4 and 181.2
Celtics 14.4 and 194
Pacers 11.5 and 212.1
Spurs .2 and 174.6
Suns 8.3 and 241.3
NCAA:
Unc 4 and 164
Louisville 3.8 and 136.4
Cavs 6.2 and 188
Lakers 2.1 and 196.5
Nets 6.0 and 201.4
Raptors .1 and 205.7
Pistons 4.4 and 181.2
Celtics 14.4 and 194
Pacers 11.5 and 212.1
Spurs .2 and 174.6
Suns 8.3 and 241.3
NCAA:
Unc 4 and 164
Louisville 3.8 and 136.4
O/U: 5-1-0 (22.1) avg total: 200.1
That's about 10 cushion with the current number @ 209
I'm assuming the is from the Prof...can't argue with his recent success with these sys plays.
- Mar 21, 2009
- 105
- 0
- 0
Yeah, me too, but happens when you work on sunday
miss out on the good stuff.Major love for NJ, but eeeveryone is on them. Feels like one of those "omg Rockets just won 6 straight at home and getting +1 @Bulls who got smoked by Wiz last night, away"...
Looking through the matchups all I see is Nets advantage, unless there is some inside info that Harris isn't playing and Carter wants to break some assisst record.
Twolves have next to worst (Wiz is worst) backcourt stopping unit..do I really have to write about how bad they are... ?
Question is, why would books open at -3 (or whatever the number was, certanly didn't go down) when they know the action will be one-sided ? The only reason I can think of is that they don't want to give value to sharps hitting Wolves...
Players, trends, stats...all point to Nets
is this correct ?
team=Nets and P:W and P:site=home and P:margin>=20 and site=away and line<0 and 20011030<=date
shorter but same
team=Nets and P:site=home and P:margin>=20 and site=away and line<0 and 20011030<=date
Last edited:
- Mar 21, 2009
- 105
- 0
- 0
hehe forgot to write it...
team=Nets and P:site=home and P:margin>=20 and site=away and line<0 and 20011030<=date
7-1 SUATS, avg line -4, avg win 8.5
sadly, this is first such situation since 2006
team=Nets and P:site=home and P:margin>=20 and site=away and line<0 and 20011030<=date
7-1 SUATS, avg line -4, avg win 8.5
sadly, this is first such situation since 2006
Damn...It is odd if everyone's seeing these trends and numbers that the line is holding steady. Are we in for major move before tip?
- Mar 17, 2009
- 63
- 0
- 0
Mornin Gents...whats happenin Ax mah brotha?!...i was tryin to multi quote your response to the sdql Barts185 had. fyi, the 202.3 avg total IS NOT the avg scores of games queried, but the avg TOTAL posted before the games were played. wothy info u all should know....ps...gotta get some back w u cats as i was along w the losin streak but missed yesterdays comeback. lets get em boyz!
- Mar 21, 2009
- 105
- 0
- 0
It will probably take a .5 move towards Nets side to get all of the "uncertain" cappers to unload on them...that might seem like sharps hitting Nets or could be everyone else (whoever is left lol) following the line movement creating avalanche and getting the line to jump 2-3 pts
My approach to this one will be just deiciding if I wanna go with Nets or pass, and pulling the trigger before anything changes.
Mornin Gents...whats happenin Ax mah brotha?!...i was tryin to multi quote your response to the sdql Barts185 had. fyi, the 202.3 avg total IS NOT the avg scores of games queried, but the avg TOTAL posted before the games were played. wothy info u all should know....ps...gotta get some back w u cats as i was along w the losin streak but missed yesterdays comeback. lets get em boyz!
This is correct. very important to distinguish. Thanks bro. Good to see you
- Mar 21, 2009
- 105
- 0
- 0
