Nolan Dalla plays >>>>

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,033
2,303
113
71
home
good luck this year, Nolan!


can be seen here for daily updates:
http://www.madjacksports.com/nolan.htm


NFL WEEK 1 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:





PHILADELPHIA at TENNESSEE

Line: Titans by 1

Total: 37.5

Comments: It remains to be seen if 2001 was just a temporary off-year for the Titans, or was last year's disappointing 7-9 SU record (including just 3 home wins after being one of the NFL's best home teams for several years) a sign of more bad things to come? Tennessee should find out the answer to this question very quickly, as they play against one of the NFL's best teams at home in their season opener. I normally don't like to use last years data coming into a new football season, but in this case there has been VERY LITTLE roster turnover on either team. 19 of 22 starters are back for a very talented Eagles team, and Titans come into the new season much healthier than the last and every key player basically the same. Both coaching staffs have also remained stable. Despite the similarities, there are some striking statistical differences that one should bear in mind. While both offenses put up mediocre numbers in 2001 (about 20 PPG), Philadelphia's defense was (and remains) FAR superior to the Titans. Eagles allowed .8 (note the decimal) average yards LESS per play last season. That's nearly a full yard on every single play! Eagles stingy defense also allowed 12 fewer points per game -- a remarkable contrast between these two teams. Eagles pass defense is clearly one of the NFL's best, and for this reason I expect Titans to struggle scoring points. However, Eagles DB T. Vincent may be out for this game (or play with injury). Eagles are also somewhat vulnerable on defense against the run (Eagles were a mediocre 18th in yards allowed last season). So, if the Titan's big OL can gain some momentum and open holes for RB's George and Floyd -- Tennessee will stay in this game all of the way and could win. I'm also wary of the Eagles woeful lack of weapons on offense. This group of WRs is arguably one of the weakest in the league (how they can collect a paycheck with a clear conscious is beyond me). Under these circumstances, and based on a line set essentially at picking the game winner, I see no justification for playing either side. While I do not like either team, a compelling case could be made for the UNDER. First, we are going along with a strong recent trend that early season games tend to be lower scoring than mid-season average. Also, since neither offense shows much of a deep pass threat, we can expect lots of ball control from both running games and time-consuming drives. I do have a very slight lean to the UNDER based on a total of 37.5 (the half-point is key). However, the best number I can find right now is 37 flat -- which makes me pass with caution. I'm also bothered by the fact that Tennessee has gone OVER in 10 of their last 13 games -- primarily because of an AWFUL pass defense. Titans upgraded that area in the off-season, but many questions still remain. Another reason why the Titans have been a great OVER recently is because linesmakers over-reacted and dropped the totals on Titans' games last year (with good reason -- they had the NFL's best defense in 2000). Now, the "correction" has already been made and game totals on Titans' games are back to the mid- to high-30s. The fact this total is right at a key number on 37 tells me the linesmakers have done their job well. That point seems obvious, since neither the line nor total has moved all week -- an indication that the money coming in on this game is about evenly split.

Final Decision: NO PLAY





NY JETS at BUFFALO

Line: Jets by 3

Total: 40.5

Comments: The public is grossly overreacting to the Jets impressive pre-season performance and perfect 4-0 record. Trends show that a good run in pre-season does NOT usually translate into a positive carryover into the regular season. In the season opener, the mediocre Jets open on the road as a division favorite against a team that was mostly competitive in their games last season and which has upgraded talent in several key areas (especially at QB). Division home dogs are routinely solid bets, and the Bills' position as a target for a wager is enhanced here by getting 3 points (the "3" is key -- at 2.5 this is a much weaker play). I like the fact that Bills coach Williams now has a full season under his belt. Although I have never been a big fan of QB Bledsoe, he does bring a boost of confidence to his new team, and now has something to prove in a new system. Bledsoe is also intimately familiar with the Jets from his days as a Patriot, which I think adds even more weight to the Bills as the choice. Add the fact that Buffalo has a MUCH BETTER group of receivers -- WRs Moulds, Price (free agent pick-up), a good pass-catching back Centers, and TE Reimersma -- than Bledsoe worked with in New England, and the Bills have enough weapons to stretch the Jets defense. It will be vital for Bills RB T. Henry to have a decent game, which I believe WILL happen as the Jets will have to respect the deep threat provided by All-Pro WR Moulds and Reimersma across the middle. Jets have some major question marks with SEVEN new starters this season, in addition to QB Testeverde's history of self-destruction (he ranks as one of the NFL's most inconsistent QBs). New York offensive coordinator Paul Hackett is calling the plays for the Jets this season, who certainly ranks in the lower echelon on NFL minds. Clueless Hackett hasn't had an original offensive concept in his head since his days in the late 80s with the Cowboys. Jets have also tinkered a great deal with their OL coming into this season (two new starters) and apparently will open up the offense at the cost of providing less pass protection for shaky Testeverde -- which could make things interesting. Finally, a wager on Buffalo plays into the contrarian system touted above (Angles #1 and #2), where a last-place team is playing against a playoff team. On the downside -- Jets have dominated Buffalo recently (4-1 ATS last five meetings). One final development has been the move on the total from 38.5 up to 40.5. With RB Martin carrying much of the load for the Jets, I'm not sure why this number moved up (the more carries Martin gets, the lower the final score should be). If RB Henry can get 20 carries, I suspect this game be close and low-scoring. But the best play here in taking Buffalo plus 3 points. In case you still have any doubts -- remember it was the Jets that knocked Bledsoe out of the game early last season and effectively changed the entire course of Bledsoe career because of that injury. I believe this adds even more to Buffalo being the more motivated team, as the home division dog capturing a key number (3).

Final Decision: PLAY BUFFALO +3

(Note: Buffalo is also a Goldman play -- see below)





PHOENIX at WASHINGTON

Line: Redskins by 7

Total: 43.5

Comments: I recommended taking Arizona plus the points nearly two months ago -- which I now see was a mistake. I should have waited before making that wager. At the time, I expected the line to drop from +6 down to 4 or 5, but instead it moved the other direction as the squares are all over Washington. This makes me love the Cardinals even more now, especially since we are capturing a key number (7) which essentially means the Redskins need a TD plus one more score to cover. I don't see that happening. In fact, I look for a possible Cardinals upset here versus the over-hyped Redskins. Arizona was an excellent road team last season, 6-1-1 ATS away, and a respectable 9-6-1 overall ATS (which essentially means the public UNDERVALUES this team). I realize Arizona has some major liabilities, particularly with their pass defense and lack of a running game. But the burden here in heavily on the Redskins to not only win the game, but cover a large margin at home -- with a new coach, new offense, new defensive coordinator, and new starting QB. Think of that idea again and let it sink in -- a new head coach, a new offensive system, a new defensive coordinator, and a new starting quarterback. Since when does unproven QB Shane Matthews deserve being installed as a 7-point favorite versus a fairly decent opponent (Cards were 7-9 SU last season). Powerful trend also suggests betting AGAINST new NFL head coaches in their first game. Washington has dropped their last six straight home openers. Another factor -- Redskins have some serious questions with their kicking game. For reasons previously expressed I am sticking with my play at ARIZONA +6 and adding yet another play at ARIZONA +7 as a BEST BET. Side Note: Total dropped from 47 down to 43.5 as more contrarians are jumping on the fade Spurrier bandwagon. Line is also perilously close at some offshores to dropping to Washington -6.5 I expect this will happen by game time.

Final Decision: PLAY ARIZONA +6 (first released in mid-July)?..PLAY ARIZONA +7 (BEST BET)
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,033
2,303
113
71
home
BALTIMORE at CAROLINA

Line: Ravens by 2

Total: 34

Comments: These are two of the worst offenses in the NFL, so the first instinct automatically says to play the UNDER. Oddly enough, the money seems to be flowing in the other direction, as the total increased upward from 32.5 to 34. I can?t understand why, exactly, except to say that the public may be more comfortable with veteran QB Peete getting the start for Panthers and believe Carolina will be able to score points. Baltimore also switched to a new 3-4 defensive alignment this season, which leaves some major question marks about how the new personnel will adjust to a the new system. Baltimore basically revamped their entire team (a whopping nine starters are gone from last season) which plays into going contrarian on the public's now outdated image of the Ravens as a power defense. Unfortunately, there are just too many nagging questions about both teams coming into this game to play a side. Both teams have horrible QB problems, and serious questions with their running games (will Ravens RB Lewis return to 2000 form?). The numbers provide no apparent edge for either side, although I lean towards the UNDER once the total hit 34. With the general trend favoring UNDERS in the first week and expected hot and humid conditions at game time in Charlotte, I think a play on the UNDER is justified. The last thing coach Billick wants to do with his young QB Redman is shake his confidence early and put him in a position where he's throwing interceptions. For this reason, I look for a conservative game plan where the Ravens will first try to establish a running game and burn up lots of clock. Ravens first-team offense (with Redman) failed to score a TD in their four pre-season games. Another fact -- seven starters on Baltimore offense have three years experience, or less. Panthers are going with an ancient 14-year mediocre vet at QB (Peete), they lost RB Foster to injury, and they have a new offensive system and coach. Although I have some minor reservations because of the defensive weaknesses of both teams coming into this game, the offenses look so bad that I'll still go with the UNDER. However, I recommend shopping around and finding the best possible number. Side Note: Be careful about a play on the Ravens. Teams that are coming off a 1-win season (in this case, Carolina) are a perfect 5-0 ATS dating back to 1984.

Final Decision: PLAY UNDER 34 (you must get 34?.at 33.5 or lower NO PLAY)





MINNESOTA at CHICAGO

Line: Bears by 4.5

Total: 40.5

Comments: Chicago has all the makings of turning into the 2002 version of the New Orleans Saints -- a team that waaaaaaay overachieved one season then fell back to reality with a losing record the next. Chicago was the beneficiary of incredible good fortune and several key turnovers last year, and now face a much tougher schedule and will take no one by surprise. The biggest concern for the Bears is their one-dimensional offense, which lacks consistency and explosiveness. Minnesota has been faced with lots of pressure to perform in recent years, and with that pressure now off, I expect the Vikings to now be somewhat more competitive in most games. They certainly match up well with the Bears, and have enough offense weapons to keep this game close and perhaps even pull off a road upset. I look for QB Culpepper to have a HUGE season and put up big numbers. Look for WR Moss to get a few breakaways, as well, now that he'll be a larger part of the offense. Vikings have may have also found a rushing game with RB Bennett. Put the entire package together and you have several weapons on offense which are clearly superior to anything the Bears counter with. Clearly the Vikings defense is a mess, with eight new starters coming into this season. However, with the lethargic nature of the Chicago offense, I don't see that as a major concern (if Vikings were playing Rams, that would be a different story). Another major development some bettors might have overlooked -- Chicago moves to a temporary stadium at University of Illinois and plays on artificial turf now (in contrast to the grass a Soldier Field). The artificial turf plays into the Viking's strengths, which is speed and multi-dimensional offense. Add the fact Minnesota comes in with a new "players' coach" and reportedly just completed an extensive off-season conditioning program, and I expect Vikings to keep this game close enough to cover the number. Based on individual player matchups (Vikings have the better offense, Bears have the better defense), I'd have this line at Chicago by 3, which means we enjoy a nice edge (at +4.5) picking up the win on 3 and 4.

Final Decision: PLAY MINNESOTA +4.5





SAN DIEGO at CINCINNATI

Line: Bengals by 2

Total: 38.5

Comments: I lean strongly to the Bengals in this game for several key reasons. First, Cincinnati on occasion is a great contrarian play (they rarely get respect from bettors -- which usually translates into extra points in the line). Normally, an average home team playing against another average team will have to lay -3. But here, we only have to lay -2, so we get some extra value with the Bengals. Cincinnati was a much better home team that road team last season, as they went a stunning 7-1 ATS. Head coach LeBeau is coming into his second full season, which I believe means Cincinnati enjoys some preparatory advantages over the Chargers. San Diego coach Marty Schottenheimer was a horrid early season bet last year (Redskins opened 0-5 SU and ATS) and now he implements his brand new system, with unfamiliar personnel, with essentially a rookie QB and goes on the road in the first game. That appears to be an omen for disaster. In terms of player matchups, Cincinnati matches up favorably with a solid OL, a serious running threat (RB Dillon), and an improving defense. Bengals defense was ranked 9th overall in the NFL last season -- and EVERY SINGLE STARTER IS RETURNING. It may surprise some, but I believe the edge also goes to Cincinnati at QB, with veteran Frerotte over the inexperienced Brees. Clearly, Brees is the more talented QB with the brighter future, but I expect second-year Brees to have some trouble adjusting to his first real NFL start on the road. Give Frerotte credit for not exactly being the one of the best QBs in the league, but he gets high marks for playing it smart and for leadership. I agree that the Chargers are headed in the right direction, but think they stumble here in a road opener against a team many bettors will take lightly. Value with the Bengals.

Final Decision: PLAY CINCINNATI -2





KANSAS CITY at CLEVELAND

Line: Browns by 3

Total: 37.5

Comments: This looks to be one of the most interesting games of the day. However, I believe the line and total are exactly where they should be, so I have no play nor further comments about picking a side or total.

Final Decision: NO PLAY


ATLANTA at GREEN BAY

Line: Packers by 7.5

Total: 42.5

Comments: That half-point hook at 7.5 sure makes it tempting to play the Falcons -- who come into the new season loaded with confidence. Atlanta upset the Packers in Green Bay at 10-point dogs last season 23-20, which shows that just about anything is possible. However, Green Bay won't get caught sleeping again in this game. Packers have historically been a very strong opening game play at home, and with the explosive nature of the Packers' offense they could run up the score if they get ahead. My reluctance to play Atlanta plus the generous points is based on skepticism about QB Vick, who is clearly a great runner and mobile threat, but who I think lacks the passing skills (and leadership) to instill the confidence of bettors. Based on what I saw last season, and a rather lackluster pre-season for Vick, his passing skills are still highly suspect. In a game that could turn into a shootout if the Falcon's pass defense struggles (very possible), it's vital that Atlanta be able to match the Packers offensively. I have my doubts that will happen here. However, I'm not laying more than a touchdown to any team in Week 1. I expect anywhere from a 7-10 point Packer win.

Final Recommendation: NO PLAY





INDIANAPOLIS at JACKSONVILLE

Line: Colts by 3.5

Total: 44.5

Comments: As much as I want to fade all the Tony Dungy hype in Indianapolis, and take a home dog getting more than a FG, I'm going to pass the temptation to bet the Jags. Jacksonville appears headed for expansion level status, and if QB Brunnell (who is injury prone) goes down, things could get very ugly. I'm not exactly a believer in the Colts as anything more than a .500 team at the moment -- especially with a horrendous defense that allowed nearly 500 points last season. Jacksonville has traditionally been a solid play at home early in the season (they stomped the Steelers here last season) as they have gone 4-0-2 ATS in the home opener the last six seasons, but that was with considerably more talent, especially on the defense. Jags lost seven starters from last season overall, including a whopping SIX on defense. That could translate into a VERY long afternoon for the Jacksonville defense, if the Colts click on all cylinders. Colts looked like an offensive juggernaut at the beginning of last season, which could rejuvenate here. I can see argument for taking either side (lay the points with the Colts versus play the home dog Jags) but I think the smart play is to pass.

Final Recommendation: NO PLAY

(Jacksonville is a Goldman play -- see below)
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,033
2,303
113
71
home
DETROIT at MIAMI

Line: Dolphins by 8

Total: 36.5

Comments: I love the UNDER in this game. Here's what's going to happen. Both offenses will struggle early on. Then, Miami will eventually pull away in the second or third quarter based on its better overall talent. Finally, the Dolphins will close out the final 15-20 minutes with a low-scoring win by force-feeding the ball repeatedly to RB Williams and running out the game clock. New Dolphins OC Norv Turner is going to use Williams in much the same manner he used Emmit Smith in his days in Dallas. Look for Williams to get 25-30 carries and burn up lots of precious clock time. Turner likes to use the backs when ahead in the 2H, and that's precisely what should happen here. Meanwhile Miami has a defense that's capable of pitching a shutout, and keeping Detroit out of the end zone, especially against a very weak Lions team that looks offensively inept. Add the heat and humidity in South Florida and this game has UNDER written all over it.

Final Recommendation: PLAY UNDER 36.5

(Detroit is a Goldman play -- see below)





ST LOUIS at DENVER

Line: Rams by 2.5

Total: 51.5

Comments: I first recommended the Broncos as a home dog back in mid-July when the line came out at Rams by 3. Denver is a phenomenal 17-7-2 under Shanahan as an underdog -- and Broncos are 10-2-1 as home dogs. Rams are quite not the same team when they move outdoors out of the dome and onto a real football field -- hell, they haven't even looked good going all the way back to mid-January when they squeeked by the Eagles in the NFL Championship. St. Louis went 0-4 in pre-season, after a miserable performance in last year's Super Bowl. I don't think the Rams are a good enough team to suddenly just turn on a switch and go out on the road and roll up a double-digit win versus a team many are picking to win the AFC West. Not at Mile High, where the Broncos enjoy a formidable home field advantage. When it comes to coaching, Rams idiot-coach Martz is not even on the same planet as Mike Shanahan. Overall, I consider these to be two very close teams talent-wise, with the Broncos having the better coach, the home field advantage, plus getting points. Note: The line has now dropped to 2.5 in most places, which make this a pass if you can't get at least +3.

Final Recommendation: PLAY DENVER +3 (first recommended in mid-July)??Pass on +2.5 or lower.





SEATTLE at OAKLAND

Line: Raiders by 7

Total: 41

Comments: I don?t like this game at all. Seattle often gives the Raiders problems and if RB Alexander gets a few breaks, this could be a very close game. Raider games have been wildly unpredictable as of late (every time kicker Janikowski lines up for a FG, you have no idea what will happen). Raiders could easily win by 30 or lose in an upset. Who the hell knows? Plenty of compelling reasons to pass on this game and look for better betting opportunities elsewhere.

Final Recommendation: NO PLAY





NEW ORLEANS at TAMPA

Line: Bucs by 6.5

Total: 37.5

Comments: I don't like this game at all. Pass.

Final Recommendation: NO PLAY





DALLAS at HOUSTON

Line: Cowboys by 7.5

Total: 34

Comments: This game has a number of similarities to the Miami-Denver matchup, where one team is likely to have problems producing points and the other will be content to control the clock with a run-oriented attack that burns up clock time. Dallas has developed an excellent defense, which should make things tough for the Texans in their home opener (they scored 3 points in the exhibition opener in Houston three weeks ago). Given that Houston should have trouble scoring points, the main fear for taking the UNDER is Dallas somehow turning this game into a rout. I don?t think that will happen, however, for a number of reasons. First, QB Carter lacks the talent to throw for 300 yards (he's awful). Dallas is also very thin at WR with Ismail out for the season (injury). Dallas hasn't had a real TE threat since Novacek's retirement -- which means Dallas will likely use its only real weapon -- the running game to get the win. Look for 35+ carries between duel RBs Smith and Hambrick and a short, high-percentage passing game that keeps the clock moving.

Final Recommendation: PLAY UNDER 34 (play any total -- regardless)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top