Obama?s spectacular incompetence turns deadly

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Obama?s spectacular incompetence turns deadly




By Joseph Curl - - Wednesday, October 15, 2014

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

It was only a matter of time.

President Obama, a short-term college professor and failed community organizer who became a mostly absentee state senator and then an all-but-invisible U.S. senator, has Petered out. Per the Peter Principle, he has risen to his level of incompetence ? some would argue far beyond it.

The president ? and the president alone ? let Ebola into America. He could have made one phone call (even on Saturday, when playing his 200th round of golf as president) and said one sentence to protect all Americans from the usually fatal disease: "No one from West Africa gets into the country."

Done. That single sentence would have kept Thomas Eric Duncan, a Liberian who had carried an Ebola sufferer back into her home after she was turned away at a hospital, out of Dallas. While he lied on an airport questionnaire about whether he had had contact with anyone suffering the disease, and while hospital workers blundered badly even though they knew he has been in Liberia, the bottom line is Duncan would not have been in America had the president banned visitors from Ebola-stricken countries. Simple.

Many African countries have instituted such bans, and most Americans think such a ban would be a good idea, according to a recent survey. But Team Obama and his band of incompetent minions argue that shutting off flights from affected countries would "harm" the economy. Absurd.

Mr. Obama's stunning incompetence filters down to all who work for him (and in many cases, were hand-picked by him). His director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the incompetent Dr. Tom Frieden, has spent the last few weeks not ? as one would expect ? ramping up response to the deadly virus, but repeatedly saying there is virtually no threat to Americans.

Then, of course, Ebola landed in the U.S., first at Dulles airport, then DFW. Despite assurances, a nurse contracted the disease, although we were told health care professionals were following the strictest protocol.

On Wednesday, another nurse tested positive. While the CDC claims hospitals are ready for the crisis, the second nurse had flown on a commercial plane the day before she reported developing symptoms of infection. Now, another 132 people may have come into direct contact with the virus ? and those people have no doubt had contact with hundreds of others.

Meanwhile, back at the White House, Team Obama is in full panic mode ? but only for political reasons. Although the president flew to a fundraiser in Colorado on Sept. 12, 2012 ? just hours after four Americans were slaughtered by terrorists ? Mr. Obama on Wednesday suddenly canceled plans to attend two fundraisers. He hastily scheduled a meeting on Ebola.

That move followed another on Saturday, when The First Golfer, already in his limo preparing for yet another round of golf, delayed his outing so he could take a phone call from Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell. The move was pure politics: He couldn't very well take that call on the way to the course, and by staying at the White House, he was able to call in the photographers, who moved photos of him "working."

Ebola is now Mr. Obama's Katrina. But where President George W. Bush was trying to mobilize thousands of rescue workers and tons of supplies for a surprisingly damaging hurricane, Mr. Obama could have prevented the arrival of a catastrophic illness that had been stomping across Africa for months. With three words: "No one in."

During August, when Ebola was emerging as a worldwide threat, Mr. Obama was playing golf daily on Martha's Vineyard. He did not direct his top advisers and Cabinet secretaries to leap into emergency mode. No Drama Obama made it all sound like everything was peachy (while throwing salt in the wound that was Ferguson, Missouri).

But with an election just three weeks away, the president is suddenly engaged. Every day brings more announcements of blue-ribbon meetings on Ebola, more pictures of him hard at work solving the world's problems (no reporters, so no questions). There was even sudden talk of him going to Dallas to make it all OK.

The White House has repeatedly used one word to describe the administration's response to the Ebola crisis: "Tenacious."

The real word that applies though is "mendacious." Or "fallacious." Any other claim is audacious.

? Joseph Curl covered the White House and politics for a decade for The Washington Times. He can be reached at josephcurl@gmail.com and on Twitter @josephcurl.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,955
2,248
113
70
home
1555513_10205062437580026_2166405954164429260_n.jpg
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Wrong. As Brent Bozell wrote in 2004 to correct myths in the days after Reagan died, Any reporter who bothered to check facts would find that Reagan discussed AIDS funding in a 1985 press conference, just for starters. But let?s turn that around on the rest of Washington. Does that mean no reporter asked Reagan about AIDS in the 1984 presidential debates? And that every interview President Reagan granted to a national or local media outlet failed to solicit Reagan?s opinions on AIDS until 1985? Using this phony-baloney spin line ? that federal policy hinges exclusively on the presidential bully pulpit ? is an exercise in liberal hyperbole over hard data. AIDS funding skyrocketed in the 1980s, almost doubling each year from 1983 ? when the media started blaring headlines ? from $44 million to $103 million, $205 million, $508 million, $922 million, and then $1.6 billion in 1988. Reagan?s secretary of Health and Human Services in1983, Margaret Heckler, declared AIDS her department?s "number one priority." While the House of Representatives was Democrat-dominated throughout the 1980s, which Democrats would quickly explain was the source of that skyrocketing AIDS funding, Reagan clearly signed the spending bills that funded the war on AIDS. In fact, neither President Reagan nor Vice President Bush was asked about AIDS in the fall debates of 1984. In the first debate on October 7, 1984, Diane Sawyer (then of CBS) even pressed Democrat nominee Walter Mondale "What remaining question would you most like to see your opponent forced to answer?" He didn't ask about AIDS either, but about the deficit. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-gr...her-hln-elizabeth-taylor#sthash.LI4qOlej.dpuf
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,858
430
83
54
Belly of the Beast
Wrong. As Brent Bozell wrote in 2004 to correct myths in the days after Reagan died, Any reporter who bothered to check facts would find that Reagan discussed AIDS funding in a 1985 press conference, just for starters. But let?s turn that around on the rest of Washington. Does that mean no reporter asked Reagan about AIDS in the 1984 presidential debates? And that every interview President Reagan granted to a national or local media outlet failed to solicit Reagan?s opinions on AIDS until 1985? Using this phony-baloney spin line ? that federal policy hinges exclusively on the presidential bully pulpit ? is an exercise in liberal hyperbole over hard data. AIDS funding skyrocketed in the 1980s, almost doubling each year from 1983 ? when the media started blaring headlines ? from $44 million to $103 million, $205 million, $508 million, $922 million, and then $1.6 billion in 1988. Reagan?s secretary of Health and Human Services in1983, Margaret Heckler, declared AIDS her department?s "number one priority." While the House of Representatives was Democrat-dominated throughout the 1980s, which Democrats would quickly explain was the source of that skyrocketing AIDS funding, Reagan clearly signed the spending bills that funded the war on AIDS. In fact, neither President Reagan nor Vice President Bush was asked about AIDS in the fall debates of 1984. In the first debate on October 7, 1984, Diane Sawyer (then of CBS) even pressed Democrat nominee Walter Mondale "What remaining question would you most like to see your opponent forced to answer?" He didn't ask about AIDS either, but about the deficit. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-gr...her-hln-elizabeth-taylor#sthash.LI4qOlej.dpuf

Nobody said he didn't say anything about it. Just that he ignored it. Maybe it wasn't as important as the Martians he was communicating with. :shrug:
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Obama Admin Predicted 25% Ebola Threat To U.S? Obama Downplayed

Obama Admin Predicted 25% Ebola Threat To U.S? Obama Downplayed

Obama Admin Predicted 25% Ebola Threat To U.S? Obama Downplayed

2:37 PM 10/16/2014

Patrick Howley is an investigative reporter for The Daily Caller

President Obama assured the American public that our country?s Ebola risk was extremely low, even after a federal government-funded study quietly found a nearly 25 percent chance of Ebola reaching the United States in September 2014.

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the federal government?s Models of Infectious Disease Agency co-funded a September 2 analysis on the threat of Ebola?s spread to countries including the United States, Israel?s Arutz Sheva reported. The analysis was circulated among federal government officials prior to its September 2 publication date.

The analysis found a nearly 25 percent ?probability of Ebola virus disease case importation? to the United States within 3 to 6 weeks.

Nevertheless, President Obama falsely said on September 16 that experts ?across our government? agree that America?s Ebola vulnerability was extremely low. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also repeatedly assured the American people that the Ebola risk was low, even after the alarming government study was completed.

?First and foremost, I want the American people to know that our experts, here at the CDC and across our government, agree that the chances of an Ebola outbreak here in the United States are extremely low,? Obama said.

Liberian visitor Thomas Eric Duncan?s arrival in Dallas on September 20 validated the study?s findings with two days to spare.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you

Although there may have been some earlier, the first CONFIRMED case of AIDS in the USA was in 1981. Reagan was President.

By the time Reagan left office in 1989, 100,000 cases of AIDS had been confirmed in the USA.

So, right wing-dingers, do tell us what Reagan did to stop AIDS?
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,761
1,036
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Although there may have been some earlier, the first CONFIRMED case of AIDS in the USA was in 1981. Reagan was President.

By the time Reagan left office in 1989, 100,000 cases of AIDS had been confirmed in the USA.

So, right wing-dingers, do tell us what Reagan did to stop AIDS?

History

Main article: History of HIV/AIDS

Discovery





The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report reported in 1981 on what was later to be called "AIDS".
AIDS was first clinically observed in 1981 in the United States.[25] The initial cases were a cluster of injecting drug users and homosexual men with no known cause of impaired immunity who showed symptoms of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), a rare opportunistic infection that was known to occur in people with very compromised immune systems.[186] Soon thereafter, an unexpected number of gay men developed a previously rare skin cancer called Kaposi's sarcoma (KS).[187][188] Many more cases of PCP and KS emerged, alerting U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and a CDC task force was formed to monitor the outbreak.[189]

In the early days, the CDC did not have an official name for the disease, often referring to it by way of the diseases that were associated with it, for example, lymphadenopathy, the disease after which the discoverers of HIV originally named the virus.[190][191] They also used Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections, the name by which a task force had been set up in 1981.[192] At one point, the CDC coined the phrase "the 4H disease", since the syndrome seemed to affect Haitians, homosexuals, hemophiliacs, and heroin users.[193] In the general press, the term "GRID", which stood for gay-related immune deficiency, had been coined.[194] However, after determining that AIDS was not isolated to the gay community,[192] it was realized that the term GRID was misleading and the term AIDS was introduced at a meeting in July 1982.[195] By September 1982 the CDC started referring to the disease as AIDS.[196]

In 1983, two separate research groups led by Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier independently declared that a novel retrovirus may have been infecting people with AIDS, and published their findings in the same issue of the journal Science.[197][198] Gallo claimed that a virus his group had isolated from a person with AIDS was strikingly similar in shape to other human T-lymphotropic viruses (HTLVs) his group had been the first to isolate. Gallo's group called their newly isolated virus HTLV-III. At the same time, Montagnier's group isolated a virus from a person presenting with swelling of the lymph nodes of the neck and physical weakness, two characteristic symptoms of AIDS. Contradicting the report from Gallo's group, Montagnier and his colleagues showed that core proteins of this virus were immunologically different from those of HTLV-I. Montagnier's group named their isolated virus lymphadenopathy-associated virus (LAV).[189] As these two viruses turned out to be the same, in 1986, LAV and HTLV-III were renamed HIV.[199]
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Blah....blah...blah...blah

There has been exactly one death from Ebola and a total of three cases in the USA.

To hear the Faux Nuse and other fear mongers, it's a REEAALLLLLLY serious problem.

Yeah, right. The rarest disease of all and we should hide under the bed.

Worry about something significant:

33,000 auto deaths last year
Firearm deaths 32,000
Poisoning deaths 46,000
Suicides 49,000

Ebola: 1 That's O-N-E

But, hey, jerkoffs, keep on ranting about OOOOballlaa.
 

ssd

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,837
53
48
Ohio
Interesting but those death facts that you list are in a completely different category than a communicable, contagious disease with a fatality rate of 50%+.


If you want to make it relevant, post the number of global flu deaths vs cases. It is more comparable.

Again, the flu fatality rate is no where near Ebola and dying from the flu is not as scary visually as bleeding out of your eyes and ass......
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Interesting but those death facts that you list are in a completely different category than a communicable, contagious disease with a fatality rate of 50%+.


If you want to make it relevant, post the number of global flu deaths vs cases. It is more comparable.

Again, the flu fatality rate is no where near Ebola and dying from the flu is not as scary visually as bleeding out of your eyes and ass......

Ebola is nowhere nearly as transmissible as influenza. Direct contact with bodily fluids is required. It's about as transmissible as AIDS, however the personal contact necessary with AIDS is usually intentional as in recreational sex. A comparison of Ebola to influenza is stupid.

You will recall that the influenza epidemic sometimes called "Spanish Flu" circled the globe in less than 12 months and killed something between 50 and 100 million. Ebola has been around since at least 1976. Has there ever been an Ebola epidemic in any civilized country?

It is, and will remain, a serious concern only in countries with the most primitive sanitation and medical availability.

You've got a 100,000X greater chance of being shot. So, if you're scared of remote possibilities, go after the more likely ones. Go get the guns. And cars. And banana peels. And get your flu shot. And don't date any ladies (or boys) of the night in Liberia.

However if you absolutely must be fearful, consider this: Ebola might evolve into an even more deadly and air transmissible virus. If so, bend over, put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye. I've always figured homo Sapiens is a dead-end species anyway. Nuclear war, super virus, whatever.

The cockroaches will survive.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top