- Sep 13, 2005
- 2,895
- 24
- 38
Rush Limbaugh
- Thread starter WhatsHisNuts
- Start date
I was hoping you might give me some insight into the evolution of the market economy in the Southern colonies.
BJ:
That was funny. How bout dem apples. Tenny don't get caught up in the "...let's back up our comments with proof..." argument. Your right wing cohort Wayne has been doing that for years. He will post links to support his psychotic positions for www.foxnew.com, www.nationalreview.org and www.kkk.com.
I mean lets be real. You can find some link to support any wacko position you want on the internet. Wayne's been doing that for years and getting away with it. He's even been making it sound authoritative.
All you gotta do is listen to Rush. As a centrist, I'd say your position is untenable.
Eddie
That was funny. How bout dem apples. Tenny don't get caught up in the "...let's back up our comments with proof..." argument. Your right wing cohort Wayne has been doing that for years. He will post links to support his psychotic positions for www.foxnew.com, www.nationalreview.org and www.kkk.com.
I mean lets be real. You can find some link to support any wacko position you want on the internet. Wayne's been doing that for years and getting away with it. He's even been making it sound authoritative.
All you gotta do is listen to Rush. As a centrist, I'd say your position is untenable.
Eddie
stay strong, tenzing. you got these leftist freedom-haters right where you want em!
god bless rush limbaugh and all the junkie chickenhawks. i wish all of america were more like him. ....of course there would be no actual armed forces to do the fighting because he's such a pussy - but still, at least we would all be saying the right things.
god bless rush limbaugh and all the junkie chickenhawks. i wish all of america were more like him. ....of course there would be no actual armed forces to do the fighting because he's such a pussy - but still, at least we would all be saying the right things.
Edward--Don't you need to get back to your liberal protector of free speech seminar:142smilie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfnn7wTgoE8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfnn7wTgoE8
Last edited:
Then how about you respond to my request for sources? I won't hold my breath. You're a hypocritical blow-hard.
Wayne:
Thanks for the link (ironic laughter in background). I'm all misty eyed now for the 60's. Reminds me of my youth and Viet Nam I.
Funny, how 40 years later and in the middle of Viet Nam II things haven't changed much. Kids still die, right wing still justifes the deaths through mouthpieces like Limbaugh, and the majority of folks buy into the government & corporate America's line of crap (back then it was the military-industrial complex).
After a while people get tired of the war and the deaths and (just like Arlo Guthrie) start thinking "...what are we fighting for...don't ask me I don't give a damn, next stop is Viet Nam."
God love ya Wayne. You remind me of Neidermeyer in Animal House.
Eddie
Thanks for the link (ironic laughter in background). I'm all misty eyed now for the 60's. Reminds me of my youth and Viet Nam I.
Funny, how 40 years later and in the middle of Viet Nam II things haven't changed much. Kids still die, right wing still justifes the deaths through mouthpieces like Limbaugh, and the majority of folks buy into the government & corporate America's line of crap (back then it was the military-industrial complex).
After a while people get tired of the war and the deaths and (just like Arlo Guthrie) start thinking "...what are we fighting for...don't ask me I don't give a damn, next stop is Viet Nam."
God love ya Wayne. You remind me of Neidermeyer in Animal House.
Eddie
Here we go again.
1. Yeah, looks like you have to pay for it. I did mention that I heard it on the radio, and didn't come across it in print. However, you said it was hearsay, so I'm providing a source.
2. Would you say that the heading on the Limbaugh site reflects what I claim to have heard on the radio? I'd say say so. Notice how I used the phrase "good riddance" as my search criteria and how it brought up the story I was talking about.
3. Why would I need to read the transcript? I heard it on the radio? Read the heading and let me know if it sounds like what I posted.
4. You're trying to spin your way out of the fact that I provided a link (with a heading that reflects EXACTLY what I posted).
You and Tenzing suffer from the same problem: you take a comment directed against one of your heroes as an attack against everything you believe in. Rather than respond to the original post (Limbaugh is an ass) you call me an embarrassment, anti-American, and pretty much make me out to be a liar. Typical.
Why not make a case for Limbaugh? Why not side with him in the fact that you believe Liberals ARE happy when negative stories come out of the war in Iraq? You want to know why you aren't taking those stances??? It's because you can't.
Listen, ahole
Listen, ahole
You keep using personal attacks.
You refrain from using facts.
Just because you hate yourself, doesn't man everyone else does.
They do hate you, but it's not a direct connection.
You have proved what you think of yourself, and what you want others to think of you.
So, we do.
Have a nice day.
And thanks for laying it out nice and clear for us.
BTW, I never said I am this that or the other.
For all you know, I could be anti-Rush.
But....
Since you never bothered to ask.....
Listen, ahole
You keep using personal attacks.
You refrain from using facts.
Just because you hate yourself, doesn't man everyone else does.
They do hate you, but it's not a direct connection.
You have proved what you think of yourself, and what you want others to think of you.
So, we do.
Have a nice day.
And thanks for laying it out nice and clear for us.
BTW, I never said I am this that or the other.
For all you know, I could be anti-Rush.
But....
Since you never bothered to ask.....
No Smurph What spin is -is when Buckwheat takes 6 posts now and counting --and still has failed to back up his initial post with fact--
All I stated to begin with--is show me the facts
Did I ever tell you I'm from Missouri originally--for real.
Buckwheat--if you can't provide the facts fine--but quit wasting bandwidth with excuses
I thought you'd appreciate that Edward
--a healthy and prosperous New Year to you.
All I stated to begin with--is show me the facts
Did I ever tell you I'm from Missouri originally--for real.
Buckwheat--if you can't provide the facts fine--but quit wasting bandwidth with excuses
I thought you'd appreciate that Edward
--a healthy and prosperous New Year to you.
yes, that's where you had the class that made you write a paper on superior/inferior races. i remember.
No Matt he posted "a" link-- to Rush's site.
I gave him benefit of doubt being new to forum but told him I like to see is initial allegation in full context.
The prob with Rush's site is you can't access text for that day unless your a member which I'm not and won't sign up for--therefore I asked him to cut and paste context and he confirms he is not member either--therefore he did not know context either.So he's posting a link he has no clue of at time to back up previous allegation.
Now if after all that--if you think he has verified anything--you slipped a spoke from the center to the left
The only conclusion I've came to is we have liberal driving down road reporting listening to Rush on radio--then directs me to Rush's site as proof of what he inferred- but after being caught with the " needing to be member to access context" admits he isn't member and never read context-- excuse me if I'm "a little" skepticle.
I gave him benefit of doubt being new to forum but told him I like to see is initial allegation in full context.
The prob with Rush's site is you can't access text for that day unless your a member which I'm not and won't sign up for--therefore I asked him to cut and paste context and he confirms he is not member either--therefore he did not know context either.So he's posting a link he has no clue of at time to back up previous allegation.
Now if after all that--if you think he has verified anything--you slipped a spoke from the center to the left
The only conclusion I've came to is we have liberal driving down road reporting listening to Rush on radio--then directs me to Rush's site as proof of what he inferred- but after being caught with the " needing to be member to access context" admits he isn't member and never read context-- excuse me if I'm "a little" skepticle.
No Matt he posted "a" link-- to Rush's site.
I gave him benefit of doubt being new to forum but told him I like to see is initial allegation in full context.
The prob with Rush's site is you can't access text for that day unless your a member which I'm not and won't sign up for--therefore I asked him to cut and paste context and he confirms he is not member either--therefore he did not know context either.So he's posting a link he has no clue of at time to back up previous allegation.
Now if after all that--if you think he has verified anything--you slipped a spoke from the center to the left
The only conclusion I've came to is we have liberal driving down road reporting listening to Rush on radio--then directs me to Rush's site as proof of what he inferred- but after being caught with the " needing to be member to access context" admits he isn't member and never read context-- excuse me if I'm "a little" skepticle.
You aren't making an argument, you're throwing up a smoke screen. I heard it on the radio and have pointed you in the direction to hear the clip. There is no transcript on this link, that I know of, just the podcast if you are willing to pay for it. Keep deflecting.
I'm Liberal? When did I report that?
For people with a fully functioning brain, here is the source I provided after being told that listening to Rush Limbaugh on the radio wasn't good enough. Below is a screen shot from Rush's site. The search now puts the story down to #5.
- Sep 13, 2005
- 2,895
- 24
- 38
This has been an entertaining exchange, however, I have one question:
What is a Liberal?
And more importantly:
What is a conservative?
The reason I ask is that in this exchange people have been called liberals numerous times both seriously and in jest.
The only working definition I can find of "Conservative" is "less government". And I am certain that a Military Intevention half way across the planet against a country that has never militarily threatened the US would not be considered "Conservative". I could provide numerous other examples of the fact that Bush and his government are not conservative but it seems like this word has definitely been hijacked. As for Liberal, it seems anyone who criticizes Bush and the Republicans is "Liberal". This is very simple word trickery that Rush Limbaugh and Sean O'Hannity use to sway their audiences. I would take off on any Liberal Radio guys but there aren't any talented ones with large audiences so it's not even worth it. The best example of a blowhard Liberal is probably Rosie O'Donnell.
What is a Liberal?
And more importantly:
What is a conservative?
The reason I ask is that in this exchange people have been called liberals numerous times both seriously and in jest.
The only working definition I can find of "Conservative" is "less government". And I am certain that a Military Intevention half way across the planet against a country that has never militarily threatened the US would not be considered "Conservative". I could provide numerous other examples of the fact that Bush and his government are not conservative but it seems like this word has definitely been hijacked. As for Liberal, it seems anyone who criticizes Bush and the Republicans is "Liberal". This is very simple word trickery that Rush Limbaugh and Sean O'Hannity use to sway their audiences. I would take off on any Liberal Radio guys but there aren't any talented ones with large audiences so it's not even worth it. The best example of a blowhard Liberal is probably Rosie O'Donnell.
If people would only understand that the Liberals or the Conservatives are not the problem. The problem is the neocons. Many Conservatives on here think the Neocons are conservative but they are not. The Neocons have infiltrated both parties and they have even made a mockery out of what a true Neocon would be. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are big time neocons.
Oh come on, gimroz! You think this is good enough for DTB?? Classic. Love the actual screenshot of the actual website.
Prediction: Wayne will claim that his computer's graphics driver is on the fritz and he's unable to view this image.
Now you Smurph--He doesn't know whats in the transcript -you don't-I don't and I don't know anyone who'd join to find out--Would be similiar to me saying heres proof he lied and put up same website>Sheez --Does someone have to spell it out for you.
For the last time-show me in transcript he refers to -all further dodges will be replied with this way--
:mfpost
For the last time-show me in transcript he refers to -all further dodges will be replied with this way--
:mfpost
