.................................................................kosar said:
Well at least we got religion in this forum so when
you get the urge.
I always knew you had some good in you kosar
Shove It!
- Thread starter Chanman
- Start date
Well at least we got religion in this forum so when
you get the urge.
I always knew you had some good in you kosar
DJV where the heck do you think my tax money is going. Of course the homeless are getting part of it IF THEY WANT IT. There are shelters in every city in this country. There are private organizations that will help that are funded by grants from the federal government in addition to corporate donations. The issue is these people are lazy and don't want to work. You cannot argue with that. If you are correct and I really doubt it that most of these homeless are vets why are they not in the VA psych wards getting the help they need if they are truly mentally ill? Theres free help paid for my the American taxpayers which apparently the vets who are under the bridges can get. I really disagree that most of the homeless are vets. But then again you seem to like to pull factoids out of the air and post them as truisms. Show me where most of the homeless are vets. The $1000 per month is a start. You can rent a nice apartment for less than that in most cities and have money to pay your gas, electric and water bill. Then, God forbid, all you have to do is get a job to pay for your food. What a novel thought that is. And yeah Hoops try going to church. I mean how can it hurt. It might give you some guiding principles for your life. And who knows, maybe you'll get an insight on the Kent/Bowling Green game. Look the bible teaches us right from wrong. There is a right and a wrong. We know that in our hearts. For some of us it just takes a little time before our heart talks to our brains. I do resent lumping me with Dr. Freeze. Although he says a lot of right things I don't agree with all that he says. I don't lump non-churchgoers together. I dont lump Kerry voters together. It just seems like those of you to the left of center seem to cluster f*** together and like a pack of wolves jump on churchgoers and Bush supporters. I'm proud to be both. I'll be laughing at you guys in November when President Bush and the Christians lead this country for another four years. Under President Bush our Christian nation will become stronger and we will be the envy of the world. You can either join the rightous or be constantly pessimistic. The rightous will win out in the end. I don't want to sound like I'm real religous but if I do so be it. Because until you try it and accept Jesus into your lives, you will never know the joy I feel. I hope you guys don't scoff at what I'm saying but, I know you will. You see, President Bush has accepted Jesus into his life and he also is on the path of the rightous.
EAE
EAE
I got a little heated there and for that I apologize to you Kosar. You can call me all the names you want and feel free to throw insults my way but I am happy with who I am and where I am going. In reading your posts, you do not seem happy and content with who you are. I say that in all seriousness. I'm new here and I already feel like I've overstepped my bounds and again I apologize. Its just that I've found something that gives me strength, makes me feel very alive and makes me want to let everyone know of the joy I'm feeling. I realize I'm at a gambling website and these words may be wasted. But I will pray for you and hope that you find the happiness that I have found. I also hope we all do well in football this year. God bless you.
EAE
EAE
i just want to thank everybody who contributed to this discussion.
i found it very entertaining.
keep up the good work & please no personal attacks.
carry on.
i found it very entertaining.
keep up the good work & please no personal attacks.
carry on.
EAE said:
I see. Well, i'm going to have to rethink how I am leading my life and truly ask myself if I am happy in my skin. That's an interesting observation and a very common one that bible-thumpers use against people that don't pray like they pray. You do what makes you happy, and i'll do the same. Peace, love and understanding rules this day.
You have nothing to apologize for and you haven't overstepped anything. That said, it's pretty hard to think that this isn't some put-on.
Thanks. Give a shout-out to the big guy in the sky for me. God bless you as well.
HEY IRONLOCK, IS THIS YOUR IDEA OF A JOKE??? LMFAO!
Thanks AR. You seem like the voice of reason in a sea of trumoil. I've seen you find both positives and negatives in posts where disagreement seems to abound, which I believe is a great attribute. Like I said I'm will respect my elder posters although I may disagree with them but at all times remain civil towards them respecting there humanity. Instead of insults I think we would all be better off complimenting and supporting each other. Just my two cents.
EAE
EAE
Kosar, thanks for quoting Elvis Costello. However, I'm serious about overstepping my bounds. I do believe in God and think that people who do contribute to society much more than people who don't. This is no put-on. This is a way of life. If you think your insulting me by calling me a bible thumper so be it. I am and I'm proud of it. If you read that book once in a while you would see that it provides you with a good roadmap of how you should live your life. Once again, I've tried your secular way of living life and it doesnt work. If you let the Lord guide you in your everyday affairs you will find that peace, love and understanding you so sarcastically refer too.
EAE
EAE
You may want to think twice about f*cking with the homeless again. Just stumbled upon this...
Copyright 2004 Houston Chronicle
GALVESTON - After suffering weeks of attacks at the hands of baseball bat-wielding teenagers, homeless men who congregate at a shopping center just blocks from this resort city's tourist-packed beaches vowed to arm themselves and wage "a war from hell."
"There's going to be a bloodbath," warned Michael Seesman, 50, informal spokesman for the men and women who camp in the area around 61st Street and Stewart Road.
In the past few months, the men said, African-American and Anglo youths have beaten them with bats as they slept, cut them with knives, threatened them with guns and pummeled them with fists.
"These kids attack us almost every day," Seesman said.
Copyright 2004 Houston Chronicle
GALVESTON - After suffering weeks of attacks at the hands of baseball bat-wielding teenagers, homeless men who congregate at a shopping center just blocks from this resort city's tourist-packed beaches vowed to arm themselves and wage "a war from hell."
"There's going to be a bloodbath," warned Michael Seesman, 50, informal spokesman for the men and women who camp in the area around 61st Street and Stewart Road.
In the past few months, the men said, African-American and Anglo youths have beaten them with bats as they slept, cut them with knives, threatened them with guns and pummeled them with fists.
"These kids attack us almost every day," Seesman said.
"Liberal logic" my friend.
A good gauge will be to see how the other side (protesters) do at both conventions.
--and while on liberal logic let me bring the media in.
The USA today one of my fav papers except for their political stance had great idea to have quest columnist from the other side cover each political convention.
If you noticed in yesterdays paper they have conservative Jonah Golldberg covering the Dems.
Their intial person of choice, Ann Coulter was scrapped Monday over her intial piece she subbmitted and the issue of allowng them to edit it.
Evidently they think she'll was to critical,which is probably correct.
---however who do you think they have to cover the Republican convention--would you believe Micheal Moore--Fair and Balanced
A good gauge will be to see how the other side (protesters) do at both conventions.
--and while on liberal logic let me bring the media in.
The USA today one of my fav papers except for their political stance had great idea to have quest columnist from the other side cover each political convention.
If you noticed in yesterdays paper they have conservative Jonah Golldberg covering the Dems.
Their intial person of choice, Ann Coulter was scrapped Monday over her intial piece she subbmitted and the issue of allowng them to edit it.
Evidently they think she'll was to critical,which is probably correct.
---however who do you think they have to cover the Republican convention--would you believe Micheal Moore--Fair and Balanced
Coulter column canceled after editing dispute
By Mark Memmott, USA TODAY
BOSTON — USA TODAY's plan to have conservative columnist and author Ann Coulter write a daily opinion column from the Democratic convention was scrapped Monday after a dispute involving the first piece she submitted.
Coulter was replaced by Jonah Goldberg, another conservative columnist and frequent CNN commentator. The newspaper still plans to have filmmaker Michael Moore, a vociferous critic of President Bush, write an opinion column during the Republican national convention in a month.
Brian Gallagher, editor of USA TODAY's editorial page, said of Coulter: "We had a disagreement over editing. We worked diligently to resolve the differences and couldn't, so we decided to part ways." He said the column had "basic weaknesses in clarity and readability that we found unacceptable."
Coulter told the online edition of Editor & Publisher magazine that "USA TODAY doesn't like my 'tone,' humor, sarcasm, etc., which raises the intriguing question of why they hired me to write for them."
Coulter posted the disputed column on her Web site, anncoulter.com. It had been scheduled to run in Monday's USA TODAY but was held while editors and Coulter tried to resolve their differences.
Gallagher said Moore will be held "to the same editing standards" as Coulter and other columnists who write for the newspaper's opinion page
Banned In Boston!
The Ann Coulter Column Too Hot for USA Today
by Ann Coulter
Posted Jul 26, 2004
Ann Coulter, the witty, vivacious HUMAN EVENTS columnist and best-selling author, was hired by USA Today to offer commentary about this week’s Democratic National Convention, but her first column was summarily rejected late last night.
“Apparently," said Coulter, "USA Today doesn’t like my ‘tone,’ humor, sarcasm, etc. etc., which raises the intriguing question of why they hired me to write for them in the first place. Perhaps they thought they were getting Catherine Coulter.”
In a sort of package deal, USA Today plans to have Michael Moore offer commentary at the Republican National Convention next month. “My guess is they will ‘get’ his humor” said Coulter. We agree.
Below is the Coulter column, in full, that caused all the ruckus. Coulter says: "Examples of their specific complaints are in ALL CAPS below. (Most of it was nonspecific B.S. about not liking my 'tone' and my column not being 'humorous' or 'coherent')."
USA Today promised us a comment on the Coulter imbroglio, which we will post as soon as we get it.
HUMAN EVENTS has learned that conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg of National Review will be Ann Coulter's replacement for the USA Today convention commentary and has confirmed that Michael Moore will provide liberal commentary during the GOP Convention. (For more on this developing story, click here.)
----------
Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston, conservatives are deploying a series of covert signals to identify one another, much like gay men do. My allies are the ones wearing crosses or American flags. The people sporting shirts emblazoned with the "F-word" are my opponents. Also, as always, the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling.
USA Today: EYE-ROLLING? AT WHAT?
Democrats are constantly suing and slandering police as violent, fascist racists -- with the exception of Boston's police, who'll be lauded as national heroes right up until the Democrats pack up and leave town on Friday, whereupon they'll revert to their natural state of being fascist, racist pigs.
USA Today: WHAT DEMOCRATS SUE THE POLICE? BUT THEY WON'T ACTUALLY REVERT TO BEING FASCIST PIGS, DON'T YOU MEAN THE DEMS WILL THINK THEY HAVE REVERTED TO BEING FASCIST PIGS?
A speaker at the Democratic National Convention this year, Al Sharpton, accused white police officers of raping and defacing Tawana Brawley in 1987, lunatic charges that eventually led to a defamation lawsuit against Sharpton and even more eventually, to Sharpton paying a jury award to the defamed plaintiff Steve Pagones. So it’s a real mystery why cops wouldn’t like Democrats.
USA Today: IS THAT LAST SENTENCE SARCASTIC? IF SO, YOU SURE LOST ME.
As for the pretty girls, I can only guess that it’s because liberal boys never try to make a move on you without the UN Security Council's approval. Plus, it’s no fun riding around in those dinky little hybrid cars. My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic National Convention.
USA Today: NOT FUNNY, I DON'T GET IT.
Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall. Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in WWE caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone".
USA Today: CLARIFY WHICH NUTS (NOTE FROM AC: THAT KILLS THE JOKE OF THE NEXT PARAGRAPH)
I thought this was a great idea until I realized the “nut” category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Teddy Kennedy -- all featured speakers at the convention. I’d say the actual policy is only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too. So it must be cages for “nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party.”
Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We’ll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he’ll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them.
USA Today: I DON'T GET IT.
For 20 years, the Democrats wouldn’t let Jimmy Carter within 100 miles of a Convention podium. The fact that Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where that party is today. Maybe they just want to remind Americans who got us into this Middle East mess in the first place. We’ve got millions of fanatical Muslims trying to slaughter Americans while shouting “Allah Akbar!” Yeah, let’s turn the nation over to these guys.
With any luck, Gore will uncork his speech comparing Republicans to Nazis. Just a few weeks ago, Gore gave a speech accusing the Bush administration of deploying “digital Brown Shirts” to intimidate journalists and pressure the media into writing good things about Bush -- in case you were wondering where all those glowing articles about Bush were coming from.
The last former government official to slake his thirst so deeply with the kool-aid and become a far-left peacenik was Ramsey Clarke and it took him a few years to really blossom. Clinton must have done some number on Gore. Then again, with his yen for earth tones in a man's wardrobe, maybe Gore's references to "Brown Shirts" was intended as a compliment.
Only one major newspaper -- the Boston Herald -- reported Gore’s “Brown Shirt” comment, though a Bush campaign spokesman's statement quoting the "Brown Shirt" line made it into the very last sentence of a Los Angeles Times article. The New York Times responded with an article criticizing “both” Republicans and Democrats for using Nazi imagery. Democrats call Republicans Nazis, the Republicans quote the Democrats calling Republicans Nazis and “both” are using Nazi imagery. (It’s a cycle of violence!)
The nuts in the cages are virtual Bertrand Russells compared to the official speakers at the Democratic Convention. On the basis of their placards, I gather the caged-nut position is that they love the troops so much, they don’t want them to get hurt defending America from terrorist attack. “Support the troops,” the signs say, “bring them home.”
That’s my new position on all government workers, except the 5% who aren’t useless, which is to say cops, prosecutors, firemen and U.S. servicemen. I love bureaucrats at the National Endowment of the Arts funding crucifixes submerged in urine so much -- I think they should go home. I love public school teachers punishing any mention of God and banning Christmas songs so much -- I think they should go home.
Walking back from the convention site I chatted with a normal Bostonian for several blocks -- who must have identified me through our covert system of signals. He was mostly bemused by the Democrats’ primetime speakers and told me he used to be an independent, but for the last 20 years found himself voting mostly Republican. Then he corrected himself and said he votes for the “American.”
I’d say I love all these Democrats in Boston so much I want them to go home, but I don’t. I want Americans to get a good long look at the French Party and keep the 7-11 challenge in mind.
USA Today: WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "THE FRENCH PARTY"? I DON'T GET IT.
By Mark Memmott, USA TODAY
BOSTON — USA TODAY's plan to have conservative columnist and author Ann Coulter write a daily opinion column from the Democratic convention was scrapped Monday after a dispute involving the first piece she submitted.
Coulter was replaced by Jonah Goldberg, another conservative columnist and frequent CNN commentator. The newspaper still plans to have filmmaker Michael Moore, a vociferous critic of President Bush, write an opinion column during the Republican national convention in a month.
Brian Gallagher, editor of USA TODAY's editorial page, said of Coulter: "We had a disagreement over editing. We worked diligently to resolve the differences and couldn't, so we decided to part ways." He said the column had "basic weaknesses in clarity and readability that we found unacceptable."
Coulter told the online edition of Editor & Publisher magazine that "USA TODAY doesn't like my 'tone,' humor, sarcasm, etc., which raises the intriguing question of why they hired me to write for them."
Coulter posted the disputed column on her Web site, anncoulter.com. It had been scheduled to run in Monday's USA TODAY but was held while editors and Coulter tried to resolve their differences.
Gallagher said Moore will be held "to the same editing standards" as Coulter and other columnists who write for the newspaper's opinion page
Banned In Boston!
The Ann Coulter Column Too Hot for USA Today
by Ann Coulter
Posted Jul 26, 2004
Ann Coulter, the witty, vivacious HUMAN EVENTS columnist and best-selling author, was hired by USA Today to offer commentary about this week’s Democratic National Convention, but her first column was summarily rejected late last night.
“Apparently," said Coulter, "USA Today doesn’t like my ‘tone,’ humor, sarcasm, etc. etc., which raises the intriguing question of why they hired me to write for them in the first place. Perhaps they thought they were getting Catherine Coulter.”
In a sort of package deal, USA Today plans to have Michael Moore offer commentary at the Republican National Convention next month. “My guess is they will ‘get’ his humor” said Coulter. We agree.
Below is the Coulter column, in full, that caused all the ruckus. Coulter says: "Examples of their specific complaints are in ALL CAPS below. (Most of it was nonspecific B.S. about not liking my 'tone' and my column not being 'humorous' or 'coherent')."
USA Today promised us a comment on the Coulter imbroglio, which we will post as soon as we get it.
HUMAN EVENTS has learned that conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg of National Review will be Ann Coulter's replacement for the USA Today convention commentary and has confirmed that Michael Moore will provide liberal commentary during the GOP Convention. (For more on this developing story, click here.)
----------
Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston, conservatives are deploying a series of covert signals to identify one another, much like gay men do. My allies are the ones wearing crosses or American flags. The people sporting shirts emblazoned with the "F-word" are my opponents. Also, as always, the pretty girls and cops are on my side, most of them barely able to conceal their eye-rolling.
USA Today: EYE-ROLLING? AT WHAT?
Democrats are constantly suing and slandering police as violent, fascist racists -- with the exception of Boston's police, who'll be lauded as national heroes right up until the Democrats pack up and leave town on Friday, whereupon they'll revert to their natural state of being fascist, racist pigs.
USA Today: WHAT DEMOCRATS SUE THE POLICE? BUT THEY WON'T ACTUALLY REVERT TO BEING FASCIST PIGS, DON'T YOU MEAN THE DEMS WILL THINK THEY HAVE REVERTED TO BEING FASCIST PIGS?
A speaker at the Democratic National Convention this year, Al Sharpton, accused white police officers of raping and defacing Tawana Brawley in 1987, lunatic charges that eventually led to a defamation lawsuit against Sharpton and even more eventually, to Sharpton paying a jury award to the defamed plaintiff Steve Pagones. So it’s a real mystery why cops wouldn’t like Democrats.
USA Today: IS THAT LAST SENTENCE SARCASTIC? IF SO, YOU SURE LOST ME.
As for the pretty girls, I can only guess that it’s because liberal boys never try to make a move on you without the UN Security Council's approval. Plus, it’s no fun riding around in those dinky little hybrid cars. My pretty-girl allies stick out like a sore thumb amongst the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons they call "women" at the Democratic National Convention.
USA Today: NOT FUNNY, I DON'T GET IT.
Apparently, the nuts at the Democratic National Convention are going to be put in cages outside the convention hall. Sadly, they won't be fighting to the death as is done in WWE caged matches. They're calling this the "protestor's area," although I suppose a better name would be the "truth-free zone".
USA Today: CLARIFY WHICH NUTS (NOTE FROM AC: THAT KILLS THE JOKE OF THE NEXT PARAGRAPH)
I thought this was a great idea until I realized the “nut” category did not include Sharpton, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and Teddy Kennedy -- all featured speakers at the convention. I’d say the actual policy is only untelegenic nuts get the cages, but little Dennis Kucinich is speaking at the Convention, too. So it must be cages for “nuts who have not run for president as serious candidates for the Democratic Party.”
Looking at the line-up of speakers at the Convention, I have developed the 7-11 challenge: I will quit making fun of, for example, Dennis Kucinich, if he can prove he can run a 7-11 properly for 8 hours. We’ll even let him have an hour or so of preparation before we open up. Within 8 hours, the money will be gone, the store will be empty, and he’ll be explaining how three 11-year olds came in and asked for the money and he gave it to them.
USA Today: I DON'T GET IT.
For 20 years, the Democrats wouldn’t let Jimmy Carter within 100 miles of a Convention podium. The fact that Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where that party is today. Maybe they just want to remind Americans who got us into this Middle East mess in the first place. We’ve got millions of fanatical Muslims trying to slaughter Americans while shouting “Allah Akbar!” Yeah, let’s turn the nation over to these guys.
With any luck, Gore will uncork his speech comparing Republicans to Nazis. Just a few weeks ago, Gore gave a speech accusing the Bush administration of deploying “digital Brown Shirts” to intimidate journalists and pressure the media into writing good things about Bush -- in case you were wondering where all those glowing articles about Bush were coming from.
The last former government official to slake his thirst so deeply with the kool-aid and become a far-left peacenik was Ramsey Clarke and it took him a few years to really blossom. Clinton must have done some number on Gore. Then again, with his yen for earth tones in a man's wardrobe, maybe Gore's references to "Brown Shirts" was intended as a compliment.
Only one major newspaper -- the Boston Herald -- reported Gore’s “Brown Shirt” comment, though a Bush campaign spokesman's statement quoting the "Brown Shirt" line made it into the very last sentence of a Los Angeles Times article. The New York Times responded with an article criticizing “both” Republicans and Democrats for using Nazi imagery. Democrats call Republicans Nazis, the Republicans quote the Democrats calling Republicans Nazis and “both” are using Nazi imagery. (It’s a cycle of violence!)
The nuts in the cages are virtual Bertrand Russells compared to the official speakers at the Democratic Convention. On the basis of their placards, I gather the caged-nut position is that they love the troops so much, they don’t want them to get hurt defending America from terrorist attack. “Support the troops,” the signs say, “bring them home.”
That’s my new position on all government workers, except the 5% who aren’t useless, which is to say cops, prosecutors, firemen and U.S. servicemen. I love bureaucrats at the National Endowment of the Arts funding crucifixes submerged in urine so much -- I think they should go home. I love public school teachers punishing any mention of God and banning Christmas songs so much -- I think they should go home.
Walking back from the convention site I chatted with a normal Bostonian for several blocks -- who must have identified me through our covert system of signals. He was mostly bemused by the Democrats’ primetime speakers and told me he used to be an independent, but for the last 20 years found himself voting mostly Republican. Then he corrected himself and said he votes for the “American.”
I’d say I love all these Democrats in Boston so much I want them to go home, but I don’t. I want Americans to get a good long look at the French Party and keep the 7-11 challenge in mind.
USA Today: WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "THE FRENCH PARTY"? I DON'T GET IT.
I think Ann Coulter mixes humor with rationale thought better than any editorial person out there. Why can't we tell the truth. The women at the national socialist convention are down right unattractive. No, there down right ugly. Just compare these braless and breastless ugly dikes to the babes you will see in a couple of weeks. No comparison. I think last night sealed a victory for President Bush. Think about who these people have as leaders of there party. On Monday night they had the most horrible president who got a blow job in the same office that Ronald Reagon honored to such a degree that he wouldn't even take off his suit coat. In addition no one ever talks about the age difference between Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. He's in his 40's and shes barely in her 20's. Taking advantage of youths like that reminds me of that teacher in Florida sleeping with that 11 year old student. Then his lesbian lawyer wife who fuzzied up the books at the Rose law firm and who wants Kerry to lose so she can run for president in 08 speaks and gives a fake hug to her husband, for show only. Then they show the audience and theres Frank Costanza. Then the featured speaker last night. What a joke. Liberal black idealistic welfare dude who also wants the presidency in 08. Can you imagine the democratic ticket in 2008 and further imagine if they won, President Obama and Vice-president Hillary Clinton. Goodbye USA. Oh yeah, I forgot another democratice hero Teddy Kennedy. All he did was kill someone while he was drunk. And there platform is morals and values. Yep, they locked up a victory last night. A victory for Presdient Bush. Another point, if Kerry was able to buffalo the american people and win can you imagine a first lady like that foreigner. She talks with an accent and wasn't even born in this country. She was born in Mozambique which I believe was a FRENCH territory. Plus she donates to left wing groups like the ACLU and other neo-communist organizations. None of these people mentioned God until they said God Bless America. Yeah if you want cheaters, sinners, foreigners, minorities, gays, non-English speaking radicals running this great country vote democratic. If you want honest, hard working, Christian, God-fearing solid Americans who will make this country strong vote for President Bush and Vice - Presdient Cheney. God Bless America.
EAE
EAE
That gal is a idiot. And she is the M Moore of the right, her and Lush/Rush. None of them do this country any good. And since you think it's so easy to live on a 1000 bucks amonth you give it a try. We will see you in the bread line.
EOE,
It's no surprise that you're an Ann Coulter fan. This is what she wrote in her column on 9/13/01:
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."
It's no surprise that you're an Ann Coulter fan. This is what she wrote in her column on 9/13/01:
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."
Yeah that was 2 days after nearly 3000 heros died on our soil a cowardly unprovoked act of Muslims. I have no problem with converting infidels to the one true religion. If chopping off the heads of these people who are being misled is the way to save 2 billion souls, I'll be the first to raise the sword at the beheadings.
EAE
EAE
EAE said:
That sounds a lot, no, it sounds exactly, like something a Muslim extremist would say.
