thank's jack,think it was you who posted this site?shop4smokers.com.just got four carton's of marlboro's from the ukraine today under $17.00 a carton.they are made in switzerland under authourity of philip morris.and in my apinion better than u.s. smoke's bit milder and slower burning.take's about three week's to recieve.HUGE SAVING'S for me!THANK'S!!!!!!!!!!
smoker's only
- Thread starter Dogfish
- Start date
saint-the title of this thr ead was smokers only ,i choose too smoke,you don't lets leave at that.
they have them there ,k-dog i have nothing to gain just trying to help.smoking was just banned in mpls saint paul,glad i don't own a bar.SMOKER'S UNITE!!
that sucks. I know they have been talking about doing that in Chicago as well. Have you ever watched that Penn & Teller BS??
They had a topic on their about second-hand smoke. No proof what so ever that it affects other people. Of course it is Penn and Teller, but it was a intersting show.
They had a topic on their about second-hand smoke. No proof what so ever that it affects other people. Of course it is Penn and Teller, but it was a intersting show.
Dogfish said:
sorry man it was an attempt at humor did not mean to offend, we all have our weaknesses in some way or another...life is short enjoy it.
I honestly cant remember why I started, not sure excatly what caused it with me, but i cant fricking quit. I have tried twice, and i have only been smoking for 6 years.
last time i went to order at shop4smokers.com they were sold out of menthols, so i have been getting mine at cigmall.net
same price, $16.20 per carton including shipping. saves me a ton of money.
same price, $16.20 per carton including shipping. saves me a ton of money.
I get mine through a vendor I deal with at work for 13.00 a carton. Gotta love that. I intend to go through a pack during the opening baseball game today :scared :scared
thought this interesting----
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...50407/ts_usatoday/formersmokersshouldresteasy
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...50407/ts_usatoday/formersmokersshouldresteasy
I own a pretty big Insurance agency in the Detroit suburbs......Had a client come in the other day and as I'm asking him questions about his families health I ask the following question:
Do you smoke: Yes
Does your wife smoke: Yes
Are there any health issues in your family. So he says: Well my two kids have severe Asthma and they use inhalers and steroids.
My next question is do you smoke in the house and in the cars, and his answer again is YES.
This is very common with smokers, they just don't get it.
Do you smoke: Yes
Does your wife smoke: Yes
Are there any health issues in your family. So he says: Well my two kids have severe Asthma and they use inhalers and steroids.
My next question is do you smoke in the house and in the cars, and his answer again is YES.
This is very common with smokers, they just don't get it.
Not that I'm for smoking but there are far worse habits---
I saw lady that weighed about 300lbs sit next to smoking section @ Mc Donalds shoveling in the fat grams and complained to a smoker in that section to put out cig it was bad for her health.
Bottom line from actuarial standpoint which of the following is NOT a decline for health coverage.
A: Smoker
B: morbid obesity
C: HIV positive
D: confirmed achoholic
Would you say there are any common myths among obese-gays or achoholics? Do they get it?
--and why on earth would an agent ask if they smoked in their house are cars. You sure have some odd health applications in detroit
and while your implying their smoking is cause of childrens condition--again from actuarial standpoint why is it if one spouse smokes and the other does not only one is rated? or would you like us to believe your opinion on 2nd hand smoke is more precise than years of actuarial studies--I assume from your remark if one smokes in household you would want to rate them all?
I saw lady that weighed about 300lbs sit next to smoking section @ Mc Donalds shoveling in the fat grams and complained to a smoker in that section to put out cig it was bad for her health.
Bottom line from actuarial standpoint which of the following is NOT a decline for health coverage.
A: Smoker
B: morbid obesity
C: HIV positive
D: confirmed achoholic
Would you say there are any common myths among obese-gays or achoholics? Do they get it?
--and why on earth would an agent ask if they smoked in their house are cars. You sure have some odd health applications in detroit
and while your implying their smoking is cause of childrens condition--again from actuarial standpoint why is it if one spouse smokes and the other does not only one is rated? or would you like us to believe your opinion on 2nd hand smoke is more precise than years of actuarial studies--I assume from your remark if one smokes in household you would want to rate them all?
Last edited:
