How are we to know if those percentages are accurate or not:shrug:
I use wagerline, a contest site that puts up it's consensus.
How are we to know if those percentages are accurate or not:shrug:
I use wagerline, a contest site that puts up it's consensus.
Ok I might sound like an idiot but does the fact it is a contest site mean the info is accurate? So they track the wagers?
I have no clue what wagerline is so I apologize for my ignorance.
I'm sure the figures are pulled from the software where the players make their selections. What would their reason be to change the numbers? I'm not a believer in consensus betting either, I'm just posting these numbers here because that's one of the popular sites that people get this information from.
That makes perfect sense.
Thanks.
And I was not trying to be an asshole, I am just always a bit skeptical when I read stats from a Sportsbook about percentages of wagers made that's all.
Now Wagerline is not a Sportsbook they track info so yes, why would they lie about those numbers?
The sportsbooks don't mind providing people with information, pretty much any information people want. They couldn't give a rats ass what people are betting. They want people to bet because in the long run they are getting all the money because they have the edge.
Cool, but his point remains valid. I considered fading for a few weeks when it was 39-21. Glad i didn't...65%+ is roughly 59% (19-13) since then
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
:0003The numbers were very misleading after the first two weeks because of all the FCS games with barely any data. It was basically even if you take those out.
:0003
Is the point of this thread to show that fading the public is worse than 47%? If so, then tailing the public is the right strategy, no?
:mj07:Major sportsbooks, knowing we at MJ's are killing them by fading consensus and recognizing Jaek's ability to relate to the masses, have hired him to throw us off the scent. Don't be discouraged. Fade away!
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I think Jack wanted to see how it played out, fading the public in general.
What these numbers mean is that this season, up to this point, when 65% or more wagerline contestants are on a side they have been right about 63% of the time.
But, thinking a bet you made has an increased or decreased chance of winning simply because more or less people are betting on the same team as you is ludacris
No one really knows what the public is and no one really knows if they are part of the public or not. Sure, information regarding how customers are betting on a game at a particular sportsbook is more accessible than ever before. But, thinking a bet you made has an increased or decreased chance of winning simply because more or less people are betting on the same team as you is ludacris. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a part of the public. In-fact, you will need to be on the public side at some time in order for the market to move and make your position profitable.
4-4 last Saturday betting the public WL consensus of 65% and higher.
YTD: 58-34
7-6-1 last Saturday betting the public WL consensus of 65% and higher.
65-40 YTD
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
