The debate on global warming is over. Way over.

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,897
708
113
50
TX
antarctic_seaice_sept19_1.jpg


Explain the ice growth in Antarctica :mj07:
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,738
286
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
antarctic_seaice_sept19_1.jpg


Explain the ice growth in Antarctica :mj07:
Hedge,
You're referencing a single NASA report in 2015. Interestingly enough this is the same organization that published the vital signs of the planet article you called fake in another thread.
Anyway, the ice in the antarctic is not growing outwardly. It's increasing in mass and density vertically and only recently. So the actual acreage or circumference is still shrinking. The reason it's growing upwardly is increased precipitation which is due to warming temperatures accelerating evaporation. The increased water vapor freezes on the small area left that still remains cold.
A good example of exactly how this happens is if you were cooking stew, frozen pizza, boiling water, whatever and move it straight from cooktop or oven directly to your freezer you'll immediately notice the visible water vapor. Do that enough times and ice/frost will develop on or near to the condenser and it will continue to build there while the areas further from the condenser will not accumulate ice.
If you never put the boiling water or pizza in the freezer, you'd not see any ice accumulation at all. Most freezers are frost free anymore but I'm guessing you've seen an older freezer that had to be thawed because of ice accumulation. That ice accumulated due to opening and closing the door and raising the temperature. Same phenomenon as global climate change, same result.
That's why Antarctica's ice is increasing in density.

Keep in mind that the NASA study is singular. There are several more that have conflicting data, quite a few actually.


The climate is changing and carbon dioxide content is steadily increasing. Whether you accept it or not won't change anything. Probably 85% of our climate anthropogenic carbon dioxide (human produced) is absorbed by the oceans in a differential pressure gas exchange. Once the sea absorbs the co2 it is changed over time to carbonic acid and it's by products. If we continue to increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the partial pressure of the gas will increase and overcome the partial pressure of the sea thus infusing more CO2 into the oceans than it can bring to equilibrium and ultimately make the oceans acidic. By by oceans, by by us. It's as simple that.

Like I said, you can deny it if you'd like, but it's going to happen if we continue on this path whether you believe it it not. Laws and precautions will be put into effect without climate the denier's input.


Hope this helps,
FDC

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,940
2,227
113
70
home
Hedge,
You're referencing a single NASA report in 2015. Interestingly enough this is the same organization that published the vital signs of the planet article you called fake in another thread.
Anyway, the ice in the antarctic is not growing outwardly. It's increasing in mass and density vertically and only has recently. So the actual acreage or circumference is still shrinking. The reason it's growing upwardly is due to increased precipitation which is due to warming temperatures accelerating evaporation. The increased water vapor freezes on the small area left that is still remains cold.
A good example of exactly how this happens is if you were cooking stew, frozen pizza, boiling water, whatever and move it straight from cooktop or oven directly to your freezer you'll immediately notice the visible water vapor. Do that enough times and ice/frost will develop on or near to the condenser and it will continue to build there while the areas further from the condenser will not accumulate ice.
If you never put the boiling water or pizza in the freezer, you'd not see any ice accumulation at all. Most freezers are frost free anymore but I'm guessing you've seen an older freezer that had to be thawed due to ice accumulation. That ice accumulated due to opening and closing the door and raising the temperature. Same phenomenon as global climate change same result.
That's why Antarctica's ice is increasing in density.

Keep in mind that the NASA study is singular. There are several more that have conflicting data, quite a few actually.


The climate is changing and carbon dioxide content is steadily increasing. Whether you accept it or nor won't change anything. Probably 85% of our climates anthrpogenic carbon dioxide (human produced) is absorbed by the oceans in a differential pressure gas exchange. Once the sea absorbs the co2 it is changed over time to carbonic acid and it's by products. If we continue to increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the partial pressure of the gas will increase and overcome the partial pressure of the sea thus infusing more CO2 into the oceans than it can bring to equilibrium and ultimately make the oceans acidic. By by oceans, by by us. It's as simple that.

Like I said, you can deny it if you'd like, but it's going to happen if we continue on this path whether you believe it it not. Laws and precautions will be put into effect with it without climate denier's input.


Hope this helps,
FDC

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
talk-to-the-hand-smiley-emoticon.gif
 

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,699
588
113
75
Hedge,
You're referencing a single NASA report in 2015. Interestingly enough this is the same organization that published the vital signs of the planet article you called fake in another thread.
Anyway, the ice in the antarctic is not growing outwardly. It's increasing in mass and density vertically and only has recently. So the actual acreage or circumference is still shrinking. The reason it's growing upwardly is due to increased precipitation which is due to warming temperatures accelerating evaporation. The increased water vapor freezes on the small area left that is still remains cold.
A good example of exactly how this happens is if you were cooking stew, frozen pizza, boiling water, whatever and move it straight from cooktop or oven directly to your freezer you'll immediately notice the visible water vapor. Do that enough times and ice/frost will develop on or near to the condenser and it will continue to build there while the areas further from the condenser will not accumulate ice.
If you never put the boiling water or pizza in the freezer, you'd not see any ice accumulation at all. Most freezers are frost free anymore but I'm guessing you've seen an older freezer that had to be thawed due to ice accumulation. That ice accumulated due to opening and closing the door and raising the temperature. Same phenomenon as global climate change same result.
That's why Antarctica's ice is increasing in density.

Keep in mind that the NASA study is singular. There are several more that have conflicting data, quite a few actually.


The climate is changing and carbon dioxide content is steadily increasing. Whether you accept it or nor won't change anything. Probably 85% of our climates anthrpogenic carbon dioxide (human produced) is absorbed by the oceans in a differential pressure gas exchange. Once the sea absorbs the co2 it is changed over time to carbonic acid and it's by products. If we continue to increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the partial pressure of the gas will increase and overcome the partial pressure of the sea thus infusing more CO2 into the oceans than it can bring to equilibrium and ultimately make the oceans acidic. By by oceans, by by us. It's as simple that.

Like I said, you can deny it if you'd like, but it's going to happen if we continue on this path whether you believe it it not. Laws and precautions will be put into effect with it without climate denier's input.


Hope this helps,
FDC



Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

:0055:0055:0055

atta boy............
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,751
1,019
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
The Paris Climate Talks Will Emit 300,000 Tons of CO2, by ...



www.wired.com/.../the-paris-talks-could-produce-300000-tons-of-...





Wired




Nov 29, 2015 - ... private jets and bullet trains) gets about 16.5 miles per gallon of jet fuel. ... Added up, all those planes flying to the Paris climate talks will ... about 80 quadrillion pounds of CO2 each year, it's not much. ... The only way to get a climate agreement that works, say most, is through some sort of shared incentive ...


UN Warming Talks Next To Luxurious Private Jet Airport ...



dailycaller.com/.../paris-un-global-warming-summit-at-p...





The Daily Caller




Dec 3, 2015 - UN Global Warming Talks Take Place At A Luxurious Private Jet Airport ... and journalists expected to attend the UN climate summit in Paris will be spending two weeks at ... Pharrell Williams urges climate change awareness.


Paris climate talks creates big carbon footprint - NY Daily ...



www.nydailynews.com/.../paris-climate-talks-creates-...

New York Daily News




Nov 30, 2015 - Paris climate change conference creates its own massive carbon footprint ... Katie Pavlich, another aggravated American, tweeted a photo of a private jet with ... from 195 countries, are attending the conference, called COP21.


Private Jet Airport Hosts Paris Climate Summit | Big Picture ...



nofrakkingconsensus.com/.../private-jet-airport-hosts-paris-climate-sum...



Oct 21, 2015 - Private Jet Airport Hosts Paris Climate Summit ... If we were serious about fighting climate change, wouldn't private jets have been banned long ago? ... and journalists expected to attend the UN climate summit in Paris will be ...


Paris Climate Change Conference Expected to be Major ...



spectator.org/.../paris-climate-change-conference...





The American Spectator




Nov 30, 2015 - Added up, all those planes flying to the Paris climate talks will ... so many private jets arrived there for a "Climate Change discussion" that Zurich ...


UN Paris Climate Hypocrisy: Limos and Learjets



www.thenewamerican.com/.../21826-un-paris-climate-confab-luxury-lim...



Oct 26, 2015 - Appropriately, the UN summit will be held at the Paris-Le Bourget Airport and ... ?If climate change were really a crisis,? Lafromboise asks, ?wouldn't ... This writer attended the first Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the ... COP15 Climate Summit in Copenhagen, with ?Limos and Private Jets for Climate ...


Global warming summit will produce '300,000 TONS of C02 ...



www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Let-s-hope-talks-aren-t-load-hot-air-Glo...

Daily Mail




Nov 30, 2015 - The climate change summit in Paris that aims to tackle global warming will ... which the website describes as a 'happy medium between private jets and ... 27 million gallons of fuel will be used by travellers attending the conference. .... Many poor nations insist rich countries bear the most responsibility for ...


1,700 private jets set to fly into Davos for World Economic ...



www.dailymail.co.uk/.../World-Economic-Forum-Skies-Switz...





Daily Mail




Jan 19, 2015 - Around 1,700 private jets flying in to Davos? for World Economic Forum meeting to discuss climate change and global warming ... There is set to be twice as many jets as normal in the airspace as those attending the meeting insist ... has been hired for around ?18,500 (?24,000) return from Paris to Zurich.


1,700 Private Jets Fly to Davos to Discuss Global Warming ...



www.breitbart.com/.../1700-private-jets-fly-to-da...








Breitbart News Network




Jan 20, 2015 - A squadron of 1700 private jets are rumbling into Davos, ... ?Decision-makers meeting in Davos must focus on ways to reduce climate risk while ... UC Berkeley to spend 1 billion on climate change companies: http://www.breitbart.com/Breit. ... Why is it so many who "accept" God, use their beliefs to be ...


Fact check: How many private jets actually flew in to Davos ...



fusion.net/.../fact-check-how-many-private-jets-actually-flew-in-to-davos...






Jan 21, 2015 - Fact check: How many private jets actually flew in to Davos? ... in to Davos? for World Economic Forum meeting to discuss climate change and ...
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,897
708
113
50
TX
explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and tell me how it was man made :0008


:0corn :0corn :0corn
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,738
286
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Shouldn't these cockSuckers have a teleconference instead of flying in to these events?

:0008
Well Skull first off your post is misleading. If you'd posted the entire article you'd see that there was not 1700 private jets flown to Davos. All the headlines you posted above, the daily mail, insider etc..., got that number from a CNN Money report. CNN Money erroneously reported the number of movements (every takeoff and every landing is considered a movement) expected during the week of the climate conference. The average number of flights operated at Davos is 850 over a five day span, so that would leave 850 flights however corporate jets rarely sit idle for a week so they may leave and come back to pick up said attendees. That would be 4 movements each plane. Factor in the 79 charter flights scheduled that week and your 1700 number is now much closer to 170. All this is in the original article you posted, but got cut off in your post.

By comparison, Donald Trump has recorded 71 flights in his private jet in a 90 day span during his campaign. Assuming the plane sat waiting for him and that it went only from destination to destination it's still for movements every flight for 284 movements which would make him a much worse "cocksucker" as it relates to a carbon footprint.
I can't see how you could have a five day conference via teleconference and expect that to reduce carbon emissions as only two attendees don't use fossil fuels for energy. Just the energy required to run all the equipment needed, not to mention the heat and air conditioning at now thousands of different locations tuned into the conference. I think you'd come out on the losing end of that idea.
I've always been curious as to why conservative media comes up with these obfuscated headlines and erroneous facts when they deny climate change in the first place, but yeah they could have teleconferenced I suppose.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,738
286
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and tell me how it was man made :0008


:0corn :0corn :0corn
Man made emissions are accelerating climate change, nobody is asserting that they caused events that predated them. Besides, i thought Republicans believe the earth is only 6000 years old anyway?
No matter, as I stated earlier, it won't matter whether you believe it or not. The science is correct and indisputable, something will have to be done.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,751
1,019
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Well Skull first off your post is misleading. If you'd posted the entire article you'd see that there was not 1700 private jets flown to Davos. All the headlines you posted above, the daily mail, insider etc..., got that number from a CNN Money report. CNN Money erroneously reported the number of movements (every takeoff and every landing is considered a movement) expected during the week of the climate conference. The average number of flights operated at Davos is 850 over a five day span, so that would leave 850 flights however corporate jets rarely sit idle for a week so they may leave and come back to pick up said attendees. That would be 4 movements each plane. Factor in the 79 charter flights scheduled that week and your 1700 number is now much closer to 170. All this is in the original article you posted, but got cut off in your post.

By comparison, Donald Trump has recorded 71 flights in his private jet in a 90 day span during his campaign. Assuming the plane sat waiting for him and that it went only from destination to destination it's still for movements every flight for 284 movements which would make him a much worse "cocksucker" as it relates to a carbon footprint.
I can't see how you could have a five day conference via teleconference and expect that to reduce carbon emissions as only two attendees don't use fossil fuels for energy. Just the energy required to run all the equipment needed, not to mention the heat and air conditioning at now thousands of different locations tuned into the conference. I think you'd come out on the losing end of that idea.
I've always been curious as to why conservative media comes up with these obfuscated headlines and erroneous facts when they deny climate change in the first place, but yeah they could have teleconferenced I suppose.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

That was a copy and paste of page 1 Google search, multiple stories to choose from.

:0008
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,192
132
63
berlin md
explain the extinction of the dinosaurs and tell me how it was man made :0008


:0corn :0corn :0corn

Holy shit balls. :00hour:00hour:00hour


You can not be serious can you?


I want to know what happened to the flintstones, sure we know what happened to the dinosaurs, but what happened to Barney and Fred? I mean they used to ride dinosaurs and use them at work, they had become friends. Why do they never mention that in history books, right hedge.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,738
286
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
That was a copy and paste of page 1 Google search, multiple stories to choose from.

:0008
I saw that and I figured that's why it read like that. I'm certain there are shitty people in every organization and they're not an exception. Poor transportation decisions by some doesn't negate the science though. That's my point. I'm not even trying to convince anyone to believe it or not. Climate change is here and human consumption is accelerating it. That is clear to myself and 99.99% of the scientific community. What to do about it or how to dissuade the worst offenders is another discussion.

Cheers skull.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top