What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Smitty

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2005
7,601
2,189
113
Upstate NY
i mean, this could easily be solved with a visit to the pinnacle site and a check of their rules. as much fun as the pissing back and forth has been.

1765860144911.png
 

yanno

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2001
3,666
179
63
Ontario
Smitty, this is kinda funny. I was just about to post more or less the same thing and did so tonite in the POD thread.

This is just to get the rules clear at Pinnacle: (also posted in POD thread). This is just to state the facts. We can all read.

Note on teasers pushing at Pinnacle: Pinnacles posted rules https://www.pinnacle.ca/en/future/betting-rules#Teasers
These are their cut and pasted rules. Note that void does not mean you lose the wager, it means the stake is returned to you. The wager is deemed null and void.

3. In a Standard Teaser, if one selection ties or is voided for any reason and the rest win, then the tied or voided selection will be removed and the payout will be determined using the adjusted number of selections. If there is only one remaining selection once all tied or voided selections have been removed, then the entire Teaser is deemed void.

4. If one selection of any two-selection Teaser ties or is voided for any reason, then the entire Teaser is deemed void.

5. If one or more selections in a Super Teaser tie or are voided for any reason, then the entire Super Teaser is deemed void.

Other books have their own rules. They also charge the juice at different rates. This may be of limited interest to Americans who were "kicked out" of Pinnacle because of political unreliability relating to sports wagering.

I am not trying to start anything here. (smilie)
 

yanno

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2001
3,666
179
63
Ontario
And by the way, what almost went wrong was Seattle and Indy. As Junior44 said in the very second post of this entire thread:

looks good yanno.........the only one that has a CHANCE and losing is if Phillip Rivers suddenly reverts back to 2015 form and throws for 400+ yards
g/l to you.............

That was prescient. Hey Junior, do you often see the future?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Junior44

Junior44

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 1999
9,379
2,598
113
58
San Diego, CA
And by the way, what almost went wrong was Seattle and Indy. As Junior44 said in the very second post of this entire thread:

looks good yanno.........the only one that has a CHANCE and losing is if Phillip Rivers suddenly reverts back to 2015 form and throws for 400+ yards
g/l to you.............

That was prescient. Hey Junior, do you often see the future?
yes yanno.........i have crystal balls :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Wow
Reactions: yanno and kickserv

Slumdog

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 7, 2021
5,191
3,009
113
And by the way, what almost went wrong was Seattle and Indy. As Junior44 said in the very second post of this entire thread:

looks good yanno.........the only one that has a CHANCE and losing is if Phillip Rivers suddenly reverts back to 2015 form and throws for 400+ yards
g/l to you.............

That was prescient. Hey Junior, do you often see the future?


Prescient. Good SAT word. It’s been a minute since I heard that one. Lol
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top