What is with all the cheating at the Olympics?

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,718
275
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
Badminton had eight women disqualified, the judge obviously cheated in the boxing match Kick was talking about, the Brits team cycling the guy crashes on purpose because of a poor start, and gets a restart. WTF?

China, you expect it from, they and North Korea have been cheating for years as has the Russians but cycling and badminton?? This shit is ridiculous.
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,140
75
48
North Carolina
Not sure why trying to win a gold medal is cheating. If losing on purpose is your strategy to win the gold....not their fault the format was set up so bad.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,718
275
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
Not sure why trying to win a gold medal is cheating. If losing on purpose is your strategy to win the gold....not their fault the format was set up so bad.

So you would prefer that all badminton players throw all matches and worst loser gets the gold? It is an athletic competition not a disgrace where you purposely create a fall on your bicycle because you got a poor start.

If you think that cheating is okay just because you found a way to abuse the rules than that is on you. I have a bit more integrity when I compete in anything.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,408
1,726
113
70
home
So you would prefer that all badminton players throw all matches and worst loser gets the gold? It is an athletic competition not a disgrace where you purposely create a fall on your bicycle because you got a poor start.

If you think that cheating is okay just because you found a way to abuse the rules than that is on you. I have a bit more integrity when I compete in anything.

Like teeing it up in the fairway? :0003
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,718
275
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
Like teeing it up in the fairway? :0003

I didn't tee up a single shot in the fairway this year. Last year I teed it up because I couldn't hit it otherwise and had recently had hand surgery so had I hit the shot fat, it would have hurt like hell. Besides, that isn't the Olympics. That was a friendly game of golf amongst friends.
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,408
1,726
113
70
home
I didn't tee up a single shot in the fairway this year. Last year I teed it up because I couldn't hit it otherwise and had recently had hand surgery so had I hit the shot fat, it would have hurt like hell. Besides, that isn't the Olympics. That was a friendly game of golf amongst friends.

:0008
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
SI had an article many, many years ago and they did a survey of olympic athletes and asked, if they could win gold with a substance that no one could trace but would kill them very prematurely, would they do it....and a very high % said yes. I'd love to see it again, but it may have been 10+ years ago-
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,140
75
48
North Carolina
I don't know exactly what happened with the badmitton stuff so correct me if I'm wrong. I thought both teams were trying to lose on purpose so they could face a much easier team in the next round to eventually advance to gold...

If the Packers play the Giants and the winner goes on to the NFL playoffs while the loser goes on to the high school playoffs....and the Super Bowl is the winner of "high school playoffs" vs "NFL playoffs".....what the fuck would you do?

If you say you'd try to win the game then you are dumbest person alive and don't understand true strategy.

I think these 2 badmitton teams should be commended for trying to win the gold medal.

Bad rules are meant to take advantage of. Think about "4 Corners" and Valvano fouling every team in his "miracle" run to the title.

Look at the Packers when they let the Broncos score to preserve time at the end of the game. Technically they "threw the game" or at least didn't compete at the end....its called strategy.

Sucks that it came down to that in badmitton but both teams had to try and take advantage of a horrible situation. They should have just let it play out and see who could actually successfully lose the game.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,718
275
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
I don't know exactly what happened with the badmitton stuff so correct me if I'm wrong. I thought both teams were trying to lose on purpose so they could face a much easier team in the next round to eventually advance to gold...

If the Packers play the Giants and the winner goes on to the NFL playoffs while the loser goes on to the high school playoffs....and the Super Bowl is the winner of "high school playoffs" vs "NFL playoffs".....what the fuck would you do?

If you say you'd try to win the game then you are dumbest person alive and don't understand true strategy.

I think these 2 badmitton teams should be commended for trying to win the gold medal.

Bad rules are meant to take advantage of. Think about "4 Corners" and Valvano fouling every team in his "miracle" run to the title.

Look at the Packers when they let the Broncos score to preserve time at the end of the game. Technically they "threw the game" or at least didn't compete at the end....its called strategy.

Sucks that it came down to that in badmitton but both teams had to try and take advantage of a horrible situation. They should have just let it play out and see who could actually successfully lose the game.
In the GB game and in the Valvano run both teams were trying to win the game they were playing. Winning the Gold means you are the best and failing to actively compete when people are paying hundreds and even thousands of dollars to watch a competition is not good sportsmanship in any case. Simply because a poorly worded rule can be interpreted to your advantage where you can purposely fix a game and lose it on purpose thus providing you a favorable seeding is never acceptable to me. They were not "trying to win the Gold" at all. They were trying to win a bronze or silver because if they thought they could win the gold then there would be nobody to avoid. They should be able to beat everyone to win the gold not just beat up on two weak teams and accept your fate in the medal game.
 

2muchchalk

Late Night
Forum Member
Aug 3, 2002
1,909
4
0
46
nj
for these many of these countries the Olympics is a representation of their culture/economic success and they will stop at nothing. To them it is a propaganda advertisement not a competition. i read some where that N. Korean athletes are sent to labor camps if they lose against rival countries or western "evil" powers.
 

marine

poker brat
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
3,867
73
48
50
Fort Worth, TX
In the GB game and in the Valvano run both teams were trying to win the game they were playing. Winning the Gold means you are the best and failing to actively compete when people are paying hundreds and even thousands of dollars to watch a competition is not good sportsmanship in any case. Simply because a poorly worded rule can be interpreted to your advantage where you can purposely fix a game and lose it on purpose thus providing you a favorable seeding is never acceptable to me. They were not "trying to win the Gold" at all. They were trying to win a bronze or silver because if they thought they could win the gold then there would be nobody to avoid. They should be able to beat everyone to win the gold not just beat up on two weak teams and accept your fate in the medal game.

But to win the gold, they need to get to the gold medal game.
Why not take the smartest/easiest/highest percentage route there?

They didn't "break a rule" during the play of their game. They weren't loading up their rackets with lead or slipping sandpaper up their sleeve and shaving the birdie before a serve.

They were trying to position themselves to have the best opportunity to play in the gold medal game (or even get to the medal round).

Sort of like Weeks 16 and 17 of the NFL, when teams will sit their key players to give them extra rest before the playoffs. They don't care if they lose, they care that they are well situated for the games that count.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,718
275
83
60
Fort Worth TX usa
But to win the gold, they need to get to the gold medal game.
Why not take the smartest/easiest/highest percentage route there?

They didn't "break a rule" during the play of their game. They weren't loading up their rackets with lead or slipping sandpaper up their sleeve and shaving the birdie before a serve.

They were trying to position themselves to have the best opportunity to play in the gold medal game (or even get to the medal round).

Sort of like Weeks 16 and 17 of the NFL, when teams will sit their key players to give them extra rest before the playoffs. They don't care if they lose, they care that they are well situated for the games that count.

They got disqualified, they broke the rules of competitive play, which is in the rules. The difference in the NFL and the Olympics is one is a tournament the other is a regular season with a post season. So the answer is quite simple and that is make all the badminton games count. I am glad they got sent home and since two of the three countries expressed remorse and disgust with the actions of their athletes and coaches, I would guess that they weren't happy with their country's representative athletes getting booed and ultimately thrown out. If you watch it, it really is disgraceful. That is my opinion and I like the rule of fair play.

Hope that helps,
FDC
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,140
75
48
North Carolina
well put marine. Some people just don't understand. I feel like I'm discussing strategy with Amato when he was at State. No strategy...just "attack attack attack"....we see where that got him. Lose Lose Lose....lol.

Ever heard of "lose the battle but win the war"???
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top