Announcement from Ferguson Missouri

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
Military Veterans Send Urgent Letter to National Guard in Ferguson Telling them to Stand Down

Hundreds of active duty US military and veterans have sent an open letter to Missouri National Guard members urging them to join Ferguson protesters, not fight against them.

The letter, signed by many veterans including dozens who fought in the Iraq war, was published on MarchForward.org and can be viewed below:
Text

To our brothers and sisters in the Missouri National Guard:

We are writing to you as active-duty U.S. service members and veterans, most of us having served in the Iraq war.

You have a choice you can make right now.

The whole world is watching the Ferguson police with disgust. They killed an unarmed, college-bound Black youth in broad daylight, and subsequently responded to peaceful, constitutionally-protected protests with extreme violence and repression.

Countless constitutional and human rights violations by these police have been documented over the course of the Ferguson protests; from attacking and threatening journalists, to using tear gas against peaceful protesters, including children.

Now, Governor Nixon has again activated the National Guard to ?support law enforcement.? But you don?t have to follow their orders?you can stand with the protesters instead.

Our true duty

When we signed up, we swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.

The police in Ferguson are violating that Constitution.

The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press.

These laws are, as we are taught our entire lives, our most cherished Constitutional rights?the whole basis for the ?freedom? we are told makes us the greatest country on Earth.

It is undeniable that the Ferguson police has used extreme violence against peaceful protesters, suppressing the right of the people to free speech and the freedom to assemble. They have attacked crowds, with children in them, with rubber bullets, sound cannons and tear gas. People have been mass arrested for simply being at the protest. Image credit: Flickr.com

Freedom of the press has also been severely infringed upon by Ferguson police. Journalists have been arrested; photo evidence shows riot police firing tear gas directly at reporters and tearing down their camera equipment; Ferguson police have been caught on video threatening journalists with violence if they don?t leave, and declaring that they are not allowed in the protest area.

With such important and dramatic events unfolding, the right of the people in the United States to have the truth covered by the press is essential to any so-called democratic society.

The people have the right to protest. If we were truly honoring our oath, we would be in Ferguson to protect the protesters against the repression of their rights by the police.

We don?t just have a legal obligation, but a moral one

Clearly, we would be within our legal rights to refuse to help the Ferguson police unconstitutionally suppress these protests. But beyond the constitutional case, we have a moral obligation to refuse to participate.

The Ferguson police are treating this like a war. And we know that not all wars are just.

These protests have done something very important in our society: they have raised the deep issues we face of inequality, poverty, racism and police misconduct onto a national stage. It has turned public consciousness to these real problems that plague our society.

Do you really want to be part of suppressing those civilians raising all these important issues on the national stage?

Racist police brutality is a real issue in America

The autopsy of Michael Brown confirms at least five eye-witness accounts that the young man?who was not even suspected by Darren Wilson of any crime?was shot while he had his hands in the air.

Those of us in the military?especially with combat experience?knows that this flies in the face of any Rules of Engagement, and we know that it is completely ridiculous to believe that Darren Wilson feared for his life in anyway whatsoever.

Increasingly, the issue of rampant police brutality in America?most frequently by white officers against people of color, with an African American killed every 28 hours by police?is garnering more and more attention on a national and international scale.

Outrage by the community against the state?s refusal to hold Darren Wilson accountable is entirely justified; the movement, led by Black youth, is a just movement.

History is unfolding, with the whole world watching. You have a decision to make on which side of history to be on.

You will make history, one way or the other

If you take part in the suppression of the protests for Michael Brown, we will be enshrined in history just as the National Guard soldiers who followed their orders to attack and repress civil rights actions, union pickets and anti-war protests. History has not looked kindly on them.

But you have the chance to make a different kind of history.

Imagine the powerful impact it would have if you abandoned your posts and marched with the protesters.

That single action could have the biggest possible effect on the crisis in Ferguson and the larger issues it represents in the entire country. It could be a major turning point in the fight against racism, inequality and police abuse.

You wouldn?t be alone. There is a whole community of service members, veterans and civilian supporters who would defend your right to do so. And now, in this critical moment, we are urging you to exercise that right.

Justice for Mike Brown! Arrest Darren Wilson!

?add your name to this open letter to the National Guard by emailing your name, branch and dates of service, and any deployments to info@marchforward.org

Peace! :)

http://theantimedia.org/veterans-national-guard-in-ferguson/
 

airportis

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2006
6,522
178
63
38
NJ
A prominent legal expert eviscerates the Darren Wilson prosecution, in 8 tweets

Lisa Bloom @LisaBloom
Follow

Most trial lawyers like me ENJOY cross-examination. It's where we can really go after inconsistencies and lies. Didn't happen in Ferguson GJ
11:23 AM - 25 Nov 2014

So many missed opportunities for cross examination of Wilson. Should have been a grueling session, not the tea party the transcript shows.
1:24 PM - 25 Nov 2014

How Wilson shd have been cross-ex'd: how did Brown solidly, "full force" punch you 2x in face, & yet you have no injuries to reflect that?
1:17 PM - 25 Nov 2014

Key to cross-exam would be requiring Wilson to explain how Brown's allegedly taking one step toward Wilson is "charging" him.
1:22 PM - 25 Nov 2014

Wilson testified he didn't think about whether Mike Brown was armed, but then he focuses on Brown's hand in waistband. Implication is weapon
1:23 PM - 25 Nov 2014

A good trial lawyer doesn't assume. Wilson: Brown's hand in waistband. Make him say he feared weapon.Then confront him w prior contrary stmt
1:59 PM - 25 Nov 2014

Hospital records for Darren Wilson's same day visit: "well-appearing, well-nourished, in no apparent distress." No one asks him to explain
2:07 PM - 25 Nov 2014

Wilson hospital record: "no bleeding, no laceration, no ecchymosis [bruises]" A cross-examiner's dream, but no c-x of Wilson on this, natch
2:37 PM - 25 Nov 2014


NO CROSS EXAMINATION of Wilson. Are you fucking kidding me?!!

And his version of the truth is accepted as fact??? What a complete joke!

Peace! :)


do you have original thoughts or is it just copy and paste jobs to back your agenda every chance you get?

Lisa Bloom is a moron. she said that "charging" is a racially tinged and offensive word. didnt a black witness say that Brown charged at Wilson too?

:facepalm:
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
You're stating that the truth is somewhere lost in translation? If you're stating that then why would you say "he was looking for a fight and that if he wasn't he would have called in before saying a damn word to Brown." There is only one way to translate that IMO.
First things first, you physically changed what I said and tried to pass it off as a direct quote. That's why you support Wilson in full. You will believe exactly what you want to and will obviously alter fact in order to appear correct. I clearly stated he, Wilson, would have called it in prior to saying a damn word to the NOW SUSPECT. Not even close to what you insinuated. If he was indeed preparing to confront a known robbery suspect he should have called it in. Every time, every day.
Certainly, you can translate that exactly as I intended it. By Wilson's own testimony he told Brown to get on the sidewalk and it wasn't until his vulgar response that he "realized" that he was a suspect in a previously reported shoplifting case and proceeded to halt the vehicle and get out. So yeah, I expect the fucking cop to follow the fucking protocol and call it in being that there were two suspects and one was apparently a yeti a whole inch taller than him.
Your response is exactly what I'm talking about when I say most of America accepts it if it agrees with their pov.
I assure you if that was your fucking son laying dead in the street you'd certainly want to know the answers to questions like that. Wilson's complete lack of any bodily injury would sure make you scratch your fucking head and ask why if that was your kid splattered all over the street with the tenth fucking bullet being the killing shot.
You're damn fucking right there's only one way to interpret it. The way it was intended.
 

Sportsaholic

Jack's Mentor
Forum Member
Jan 18, 2000
32,345
314
0
62
Crustacean Nation
First things first, you physically changed what I said and tried to pass it off as a direct quote. That's why you support Wilson in full. You will believe exactly what you want to and will obviously alter fact in order to appear correct. I clearly stated he, Wilson, would have called it in prior to saying a damn word to the NOW SUSPECT. Not even close to what you insinuated. If he was indeed preparing to confront a known robbery suspect he should have called it in. Every time, every day.
Certainly, you can translate that exactly as I intended it. By Wilson's own testimony he told Brown to get on the sidewalk and it wasn't until his vulgar response that he "realized" that he was a suspect in a previously reported shoplifting case and proceeded to halt the vehicle and get out. So yeah, I expect the fucking cop to follow the fucking protocol and call it in being that there were two suspects and one was apparently a yeti a whole inch taller than him.
Your response is exactly what I'm talking about when I say most of America accepts it if it agrees with their pov.
I assure you if that was your fucking son laying dead in the street you'd certainly want to know the answers to questions like that. Wilson's complete lack of any bodily injury would sure make you scratch your fucking head and ask why if that was your kid splattered all over the street with the tenth fucking bullet being the killing shot.
You're damn fucking right there's only one way to interpret it. The way it was intended.


Did you see the video of Browns attitude and aggressiveness minutes before at the store? Do you really think that attitude and aggressiveness changed any when he met up the Officer? Brown chose his fate the rest are left to pick up the pieces.....:0008:0008
 

Handi Capper

'That Said'
Forum Member
Apr 8, 2004
11,769
556
113
67
northern Ky
Certainly, you can translate that exactly as I intended it. By Wilson's own testimony he told Brown to get on the sidewalk and it wasn't until his vulgar response that he "realized" that he was a suspect in a previously reported shoplifting case and proceeded to halt the vehicle and get out. So yeah, I expect the fucking cop to follow the fucking protocol and call it in being that there were two suspects and one was apparently a yeti a whole inch taller than him.
Your response is exactly what I'm talking about when I say most of America accepts it if it agrees with their pov.
I assure you if that was your fucking son laying dead in the street you'd certainly want to know the answers to questions like that. Wilson's complete lack of any bodily injury would sure make you scratch your fucking head and ask why if that was your kid splattered all over the street with the tenth fucking bullet being the killing shot.
You're damn fucking right there's only one way to interpret it. The way it was intended.

WHAT IF
it was the body of the police officer splattered all over the street & it was your son
THEN WHAT
 

Double Two

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2001
34,188
777
113
61
Pelham, Alabama USA
Saw Michael Brown's mother on a few shows spewing all sorts of vile accusations towards Officer Wilson, the Ferguson Police Dept. & the DA discounting the facts & eye-witnesses. Of course her ramblings & outright lies went unchallenged by the hosts of the shows on CBS, CNN & MSNBC as these networks need this controversy too fester in order too help with their poor ratings. Wish someone would enlighten this poor women with a few TRUE statements about this situation like:

A.) YOUR son was a suspect in a robbery so Officer Wilson had cause too engage him. Later video confirmed that YOUR son indeed committed a Felony & roughed-up the store owner for good measure.

B.) YOUR son struck Officer Wilson & tried too get his gun.

C.) YOUR son charged Officer Wilson after repeated requests by Wilson too stop & get on the ground. YOUR son choose NOT too obey the Officer & was shot.

D.) I'm sorry for your loss but YOUR son was the bad guy in this tragic event, not Officer Wilson.

E.) The Ferguson Police Dept. did not force YOUR son too commit a felony, try too dis-arm a policeman & then dis-obey repeated requests too surrender.

F.) YOUR son is the person who is responsible for his own death, not the DA.



Remember Miss. Wilson, if points A, B & C had NOT happened then YOUR son would be alive today.

It's a shame, but predictable, that most in the press let her get away with blaming everyone else in this tragic event except the one who caused it in the first place.
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Did you see the video of Browns attitude and aggressiveness minutes before at the store? Do you really think that attitude and aggressiveness changed any when he met up the Officer? Brown chose his fate the rest are left to pick up the pieces.....:0008:0008
Of course you're speaking of the one and only video of Brown in an altercation in a convenience store ever released to the public. In also assuming that you know that the video your speaking of was not known to Wilson nor viewed by Wilson prior to his stopping Brown. I can only assume you also know that the store owner the video was shot at refuses to name Brown as the man in the video and still maintains it isn't Brown. You definitely must know that the feds asked that Ferguson police not release the video and they did anyway.
So no, neither of us or anyone here saw any video like that at all. Some may have seen a random video of someone that bears resemblance to a large black kid but that is it. Again, I don't presume anything. I know of no aggression that was in place prior to the incident other than a cop entering a bad neighborhood on high alert because the type of people in that neighborhood, poor black people, are troublemakers. I only know that because that's what he testified to. So having more facts you can see why some people have questions
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Saw Michael Brown's mother on a few shows spewing all sorts of vile accusations towards Officer Wilson, the Ferguson Police Dept. & the DA discounting the facts & eye-witnesses. Of course her ramblings & outright lies went unchallenged by the hosts of the shows on CBS, CNN & MSNBC as these networks need this controversy too fester in order too help with their poor ratings. Wish someone would enlighten this poor women with a few TRUE statements about this situation like:

A.) YOUR son was a suspect in a robbery so Officer Wilson had cause too engage him. Later video confirmed that YOUR son indeed committed a Felony & roughed-up the store owner for good measure.

B.) YOUR son struck Officer Wilson & tried too get his gun.

C.) YOUR son charged Officer Wilson after repeated requests by Wilson too stop & get on the ground. YOUR son choose NOT too obey the Officer & was shot.

D.) I'm sorry for your loss but YOUR son was the bad guy in this tragic event, not Officer Wilson.

E.) The Ferguson Police Dept. did not force YOUR son too commit a felony, try too dis-arm a policeman & then dis-obey repeated requests too surrender.

F.) YOUR son is the person who is responsible for his own death, not the DA.



Remember Miss. Wilson, if points A, B & C had NOT happened then YOUR son would be alive today.

It's a shame, but predictable, that most in the press let her get away with blaming everyone else in this tragic event except the one who caused it in the first place.
So much wrong with this post. Get your facts straight.
 

Handi Capper

'That Said'
Forum Member
Apr 8, 2004
11,769
556
113
67
northern Ky
Of course you're speaking of the one and only video of Brown in an altercation in a convenience store ever released to the public. In also assuming that you know that the video your speaking of was not known to Wilson nor viewed by Wilson prior to his stopping Brown. I can only assume you also know that the store owner the video was shot at refuses to name Brown as the man in the video and still maintains it isn't Brown. You definitely must know that the feds asked that Ferguson police not release the video and they did anyway.
So no, neither of us or anyone here saw any video like that at all. Some may have seen a random video of someone that bears resemblance to a large black kid but that is it. Again, I don't presume anything. I know of no aggression that was in place prior to the incident other than a cop entering a bad neighborhood on high alert because the type of people in that neighborhood, poor black people, are troublemakers. I only know that because that's what he testified to. So having more facts you can see why some people have questions

:facepalm:
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Saw Michael Brown's mother on a few shows spewing all sorts of vile accusations towards Officer Wilson, the Ferguson Police Dept. & the DA discounting the facts & eye-witnesses. Of course her ramblings & outright lies went unchallenged by the hosts of the shows on CBS, CNN & MSNBC as these networks need this controversy too fester in order too help with their poor ratings. Wish someone would enlighten this poor women with a few TRUE statements about this situation like:

A.) YOUR son was a suspect in a robbery so Officer Wilson had cause too engage him. Later video confirmed that YOUR son indeed committed a Felony & roughed-up the store owner for good measure.

B.) YOUR son struck Officer Wilson & tried too get his gun.

C.) YOUR son charged Officer Wilson after repeated requests by Wilson too stop & get on the ground. YOUR son choose NOT too obey the Officer & was shot.

D.) I'm sorry for your loss but YOUR son was the bad guy in this tragic event, not Officer Wilson.

E.) The Ferguson Police Dept. did not force YOUR son too commit a felony, try too dis-arm a policeman & then dis-obey repeated requests too surrender.

F.) YOUR son is the person who is responsible for his own death, not the DA.



Remember Miss. Wilson, if points A, B & C had NOT happened then YOUR son would be alive today.

It's a shame, but predictable, that most in the press let her get away with blaming everyone else in this tragic event except the one who caused it in the first place.
Certainly. It's been fairly widely reported that Wilson had no idea about the video prior to confronting Brown. So your statements are utterly ridiculous. It has also NEVER been confirmed by anyone other than you and hedge that the man in the video is brown and certainly not by the owner of the store where the video was shot. More utterly ridiculous statements by you. Then you seem to think that ten fucking rounds into a person only one inch taller than you is justified as long as a cop days he was in fear of his life. Unfortunately, the same cop had no visible wounds or bruises upon medical examination. So you just keep repeating what you think you heard and it's clear that you haven't done s much as even check your facts. And finally my favorite part is when you name only liberal stations as broadcasting the mother when clearly all of them aired the exact same thing including fox. So not only do you misrepresent the facts of the case but you try to pass off your ignorance as being a liberal issue. Shall I continue, or would you prefer to retort with some more misinformed bullshit you heard on rush?
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,720
277
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
:facepalm:
Not sure why you're acting as if I'm the clueless one here. It's quite easy to find these facts. As a matter of fact reuters is carrying the story of the videotape right now. Go look for yourself. Sorry that you think the cop is a saint. He isn't a hundred percent clean brother. Facepalm me all you want, that's fine, I like being informed prior to passing my white right of judgement on others
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
Justice Antonin Scalia, in the 1992 Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, explained what the role of a grand jury has been for hundreds of years.

It is the grand jury?s function not ?to enquire ? upon what foundation [the charge may be] denied,? or otherwise to try the suspect?s defenses, but only to examine ?upon what foundation [the charge] is made? by the prosecutor. Respublica v. Shaffer, 1 Dall. 236 (O. T. Phila. 1788); see also F. Wharton, Criminal Pleading and Practice ? 360, pp. 248-249 (8th ed. 1880). As a consequence, neither in this country nor in England has the suspect under investigation by the grand jury ever been thought to have a right to testify or to have exculpatory evidence presented.

This passage was first highlighted by attorney Ian Samuel, a former clerk to Justice Scalia.
In contrast, McCulloch allowed Wilson to testify for hours before the grand jury and presented them with every scrap of exculpatory evidence available. In his press conference, McCulloch said that the grand jury did not indict because eyewitness testimony that established Wilson was acting in self-defense was contradicted by other exculpatory evidence. What McCulloch didn?t say is that he was under no obligation to present such evidence to the grand jury. The only reason one would present such evidence is to reduce the chances that the grand jury would indict Darren Wilson.

Compare Justice Scalia?s description of the role of the grand jury to what the prosecutors told the Ferguson grand jury before they started their deliberations:
And you must find probable cause to believe that Darren Wilson did not act in lawful self-defense and you must find probable cause to believe that Darren Wilson did not use lawful force in making an arrest. If you find those things, which is kind of like finding a negative, you cannot return an indictment on anything or true bill unless you find both of those things. Because both are complete defenses to any offense and they both have been raised in his, in the evidence.

As Justice Scalia explained the evidence to support these ?complete defenses,? including Wilson?s testimony, was only included by McCulloch by ignoring how grand juries historically work.
There were several eyewitness accounts that strongly suggested Wilson did not act in self-defense. McCulloch could have, and his critics say should have, presented that evidence to the grand jury and likely returned an indictment in days, not months. It?s a low bar, which is why virtually all grand juries return indictments.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
'
I think I see some holes in the dyke

no cross ex by McCullough ?

wtf
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top