CLASSIC NEO CON THINKINGS

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
Injustice Facts ‏

In 2010, GE paid $0 in taxes and collected $3.2 billion in tax benefits, while conservatives think poor mothers are squeezing the system.

Peace! :)
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,421
703
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Injustice Facts ‏

In 2010, GE paid $0 in taxes and collected $3.2 billion in tax benefits, while DEMOCRATS think poor mothers are squeezing the system.

Peace! :)



Shahien Nasiripourshahien@huffingtonpost.comBecome a fan of this reporter

GET UPDATES FROM Shahien




Obama Picks Jeffrey Immelt, GE CEO, To Run New Jobs-Focused Panel As GE Sends Jobs Overseas, Pays Little In Taxes


First Posted: 01/21/11 11:59 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET





Jeffrey R. Immelt, the chairman and chief executive of General Electric Co. tapped by President Barack Obama as his next top outside economic adviser, will be asked to guide the White House as it attempts to jump-start lackluster job creation and spur a muddled recovery.

Immelt's firm stands as Exhibit A of a successful and profitable corporate America standing at the forefront of the recovery. It also represents the archetypal company that's hoarding cash, sending jobs overseas, relying on taxpayer bailouts and paying less taxes than envisioned.

The move is the latest salvo in the White House's continued aggressive and very public outreach to corporate America. Earlier this month, Obama appointed a top executive at JPMorgan Chase as his chief of staff, and this week he granted a longtime wish of business interests by promising to review federal regulations perceived as onerous.

Immelt's appointment raises fresh questions about Obama's courtship and future policy proposals. Firms like GE say good jobs will come from lower taxes and less regulation. Immelt told analysts Friday that he'll focus on tax policy and regulation, among other topics.

"A clear problem in the recovery is that it's been a much stronger recovery for business in terms of their profit and earnings than for those folks who work and earn a living in the U.S.," said Gary Burtless, a former Labor Department economist and now a fellow at the Brookings Institution, a research and policy organization in Washington.

Burtless said Immelt was likely hired to reassure corporate America. Political opponents have cast the Obama administration as unfriendly to business interests, and the administration has had difficulty rebutting that theme. Immelt's hiring was yet another step in that direction.

"It's a significant piece of outreach to the business community," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office and top economic adviser to Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign. The appointment could mean business has a "genuine liaison" at the White House, Holtz-Eakin said.




"Business folks will trust an Immelt much more than an academic or a politician with academic experience," said Burtless.

Whether GE's chief executive should represent the White House in those discussions, though, is another matter. He will continue to serve atop GE while advising the Obama administration.

The corporate chieftain's experience running GE, one of the world's biggest companies, may shed light on the kinds of recommendations he'd make behind closed doors.

The company is sitting on $79 billion in cash, tops worldwide among non-financial publicly-traded companies, according to a Jan. 10 note by analysts at Standard and Poor's. In fact, GE's cash holdings are about 62 percent more than the next company, Toyota Motor Corp.

"We feel good about that," Immelt said in noting the "flexibility" the surplus cash gives the firm. GE generated a $11.6 billion profit last year, a six percent increase from the previous year.

Non-financial corporations sit atop a record $1.9 trillion in liquid assets, according to the Federal Reserve. Relative to their short-term liabilities, U.S. corporations haven't been this flush with cash since 1956. The administration has been critical of corporate cash-hoarding.

GE's improving fortunes reflect the general trend in corporate America. In the quarter ending Sept. 30, corporate profits reached an all-time high of $1.66 trillion on an annual basis, according to the Commerce Department.

Yet nearly one in ten American workers is jobless. The unemployment rate has been stuck above nine percent for 20 consecutive months, the longest such streak since records began in 1948, according to the Labor Department. When Barack Obama took office, joblessness stood at 7.8 percent.

And the rate isn't forecast to significantly decrease anytime soon. During the firm's Friday call with analysts, Keith S. Sherin, GE's vice chairman and chief financial officer, described the nation's unemployment situation as "sticky."

The diverging fortunes of big business and households reflect the central challenge faced by the Obama administration: What kind of policies can it implement to incentivize profitable firms to spend and hire at home?

As the administration struggles to prod businesses to create jobs at home, GE has been busy sending them abroad. Since Immelt took over in 2001, GE has shed 34,000 jobs in the U.S., according to its most recent annual filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. But it's added 25,000 jobs overseas.

At the end of 2009, GE employed 36,000 more people abroad than it did in the U.S. In 2000, it was nearly the opposite.

Unions are worried. Leo Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers, said he hopes the Immelt-led White House panel won't be dominated by big business.

"It has to have more than CEOs that are already operating offshore," Gerard said.

Foreign work has proven lucrative to GE. In 2007, it derived half of its global sales from work abroad. In 2009, that share increased to 54 percent. U.S. sales have shrunk.

And rather than invest in the U.S., the company has decided to look elsewhere. In 2008 and 2009, GE decided to "indefinitely" reinvest prior-year earnings outside the country, according to SEC filings. That's helped the firm lower its tax rate.

In 2009, the Connecticut-based firm effectively had a negative tax rate, thanks to the $498 million loss it booked on U.S. operations versus the $10.8 billion in earnings it booked abroad. GE realized a $1.1 billion tax benefit in 2009.

In 2008, it paid $1.1 billion in taxes for a 5.3 percent tax rate. In 2007, it paid $4.2 billion in taxes for a 15.1 percent tax rate.

By comparison, during those three years -- 2007 through 2009 -- the firm reported combined net income of $50.6 billion.

The corporate tax rate in the U.S. is supposed to be 35 percent.

"I am so proud and pleased that Jeff has agreed to chair this panel -- my Council on Jobs and Competitiveness -- because we think GE has something to teach businesses all across America," Obama told a crowd of GE workers Friday at a plant in Schenectady, New York.

Immelt's appointment makes all but certain that the administration will focus on cutting corporate tax rates as part of the tax code overhaul Obama is reportedly considering, said Thomas Ferguson, a political science professor at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, and a senior fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, a New York-based research organization.

"It's hard to see corporate tax cuts as a problem for the U.S. right now," Ferguson said. "But those cuts are clearly coming. They've signaled that already," he said about the Obama administration.

Immelt, who's long had influence with the Obama White House -- he's visited the White House at least 16 times, meeting with Obama on at least five occasions -- is among an influential group of executives who want to see lower corporate tax rates. Corporate executives say lower taxes will lead to job creation as businesses would focus their cash on expansion.

And as Immelt takes over a council that had been dedicated to advising Obama on how to heal the economy and financial sector after the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, observers noted the extent to which Immelt's firm benefited from various bailout programs.

While the previous council was led by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, whose warnings about the growth of the financial sector and the increasing riskiness it poses to the economy made him a hero to reformers, the current incarnation will be led by a chief executive who serves on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's board of directors. His firm continues to benefit from lower costs thanks to the $55 billion of outstanding taxpayer-backed debt its finance unit has issued under a crisis-era program that was supposed to be for banks.

All told, GE and its subsidiary, GE Capital, accessed nearly $100 billion through programs created by the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to combat frozen credit markets.

"There are two problematical issues for folks who are not sympathetic to the president," said Burtless. One, "GE was intimately connected to the financial crisis," and two, "GE may have shifted a bigger proportion of its output outside the U.S."

On Friday, though, Immelt's hire was nearly universally praised by business groups.

Thomas J. Donohue, president and chief executive of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, called Obama's move a "promising step toward a renewed focus on creating jobs, boosting economic growth, and enhancing America's global competitiveness." He added that Immelt was an "excellent choice."

Sam Stein and Marcus Baram contributed reporting.


I fixed it for YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
I will tell you one thing that I believe


if the country is going to go to total hell like Iran WWIII or really bad stuff we cant anticipate



it will be with Hillary
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Meanwhile, the broad federal deficit projection shows another yearly improvement. Obama inherited an economy in crisis and the first deficits ever to exceed $1 trillion. The 2009 total, swelled by the costs of the Wall Street bailout, hit a record $1.4 trillion, while the deficits of 2010 and 2011 each registered $1.3 trillion.

The agency sees the deficit sliding to $478 billion next year before beginning a steady rise years through 2024 that would bring the annual imbalance back above $1 trillion. Overall, it forecasts deficits totaling $7.3 trillion over the coming decade, about $1 trillion more than previously estimated.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Mr. President, This Is My America: Life in an RV Park With a Master's Degree

Dear Mr. President,

I write to you today because I have nowhere else to turn. I lost my full time job in September 2012. I have only been able to find part-time employment -- 16 hours each week at $12 per hour -- but I don't work that every week. For the month of December, my net pay was $365. My husband and I now live in an RV at a campground because of my job loss. Our monthly rent is $455 and that doesn't include utilities. We were given this 27-ft. 1983 RV when I lost my job.

This is America today. We have no running water; we use a hose to fill jugs. We have no shower but the campground does. We have a toilet but it only works when the sewer line doesn't freeze -- if it freezes, we use the campground's restrooms. At night, in my bed, when it's cold out, my blanket can freeze to the wall of the RV. We don't have a stove or an oven, just a microwave, so regular-food cooking is out. Recently we found a small toaster oven on sale so we can bake a little now because eating only microwaved food just wasn't working for us. We don't have a refrigerator, just an icebox (a block of ice cost about $1.89). It keeps things relatively cold. If it's freezing outside, we just put things on the picnic table.

Unfortunately, we can't buy things in bulk because they will go bad before we can use them. We can't buy dry goods in bulk either, because there is no room to store them anywhere in the RV.

We are very lucky that the campground has showers, but it costs 25 cents for two minutes. There have been times when we couldn't afford a shower and had to resort to bathing in the campground restroom sink. There was a shower in the RV but the plumbing has deteriorated so now we use it a a closet.

The walls of the RV are not well insulated, so many times the inside gets wet from condensation. That means all of the blankets that we have stored above the bed may end up moldy if we don't remove them an dry them periodically. There is mold under the carpet on the floor and there is mold along the walls behind our seats. But we keep it clean the best we can. The heating system in the RV no longer functions, so we have a small radiator-type floor heater and we move it around to dry the floor to keep it from molding.

My husband is bipolar and was considered disabled and was receiving SSI. Prior to my job loss, he was seen for 12 minutes by a disability physician, never asked about his bi-polar condition and was kicked off disability. He had received $1,000 per month, but it is gone.

After I lost my job at a college, we moved from Kern County in California, where the unemployment rate is over 10 percent, to the Pacific Northwest where the unemployment rate is lower to be near my son and grandson but without gas money, we still can't visit them.

So now we sit. I apply for so many jobs daily. I have a Master's degree and have been in the workforce for over 30 years. Why can't I find a job? I have marketable skills. My credit is gone (credit score of 570) and so I am no longer being considered for jobs in the "real" world. I am only ever considered for government jobs and even then, they usually know who they plan to hire but they have to go through the process. So here we sit.

I had been receiving unemployment benefits from California but now that the unemployment rate for the state is lower, there are no more funds coming in.

My husband can't find a job. No one wants to hire me. Luckily, the State of Washington has decided to provide us with $300 in food stamps each month but it still isn't enough to survive on. All of our savings is gone. I no longer have any retirement savings. Nothing. By the end of this month, we will be without anywhere to turn.

Your devoted constituent,
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,421
703
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Mr. President, This Is My America: Life in an RV Park With a Master's Degree

Dear Mr. President,

I write to you today because I have nowhere else to turn. I lost my full time job in September 2012. I have only been able to find part-time employment -- 16 hours each week at $12 per hour -- but I don't work that every week. For the month of December, my net pay was $365. My husband and I now live in an RV at a campground because of my job loss. Our monthly rent is $455 and that doesn't include utilities. We were given this 27-ft. 1983 RV when I lost my job.

This is America today. We have no running water; we use a hose to fill jugs. We have no shower but the campground does. We have a toilet but it only works when the sewer line doesn't freeze -- if it freezes, we use the campground's restrooms. At night, in my bed, when it's cold out, my blanket can freeze to the wall of the RV. We don't have a stove or an oven, just a microwave, so regular-food cooking is out. Recently we found a small toaster oven on sale so we can bake a little now because eating only microwaved food just wasn't working for us. We don't have a refrigerator, just an icebox (a block of ice cost about $1.89). It keeps things relatively cold. If it's freezing outside, we just put things on the picnic table.

Unfortunately, we can't buy things in bulk because they will go bad before we can use them. We can't buy dry goods in bulk either, because there is no room to store them anywhere in the RV.

We are very lucky that the campground has showers, but it costs 25 cents for two minutes. There have been times when we couldn't afford a shower and had to resort to bathing in the campground restroom sink. There was a shower in the RV but the plumbing has deteriorated so now we use it a a closet.

The walls of the RV are not well insulated, so many times the inside gets wet from condensation. That means all of the blankets that we have stored above the bed may end up moldy if we don't remove them an dry them periodically. There is mold under the carpet on the floor and there is mold along the walls behind our seats. But we keep it clean the best we can. The heating system in the RV no longer functions, so we have a small radiator-type floor heater and we move it around to dry the floor to keep it from molding.

My husband is bipolar and was considered disabled and was receiving SSI. Prior to my job loss, he was seen for 12 minutes by a disability physician, never asked about his bi-polar condition and was kicked off disability. He had received $1,000 per month, but it is gone.

After I lost my job at a college, we moved from Kern County in California, where the unemployment rate is over 10 percent, to the Pacific Northwest where the unemployment rate is lower to be near my son and grandson but without gas money, we still can't visit them.

So now we sit. I apply for so many jobs daily. I have a Master's degree and have been in the workforce for over 30 years. Why can't I find a job? I have marketable skills. My credit is gone (credit score of 570) and so I am no longer being considered for jobs in the "real" world. I am only ever considered for government jobs and even then, they usually know who they plan to hire but they have to go through the process. So here we sit.

I had been receiving unemployment benefits from California but now that the unemployment rate for the state is lower, there are no more funds coming in.

My husband can't find a job. No one wants to hire me. Luckily, the State of Washington has decided to provide us with $300 in food stamps each month but it still isn't enough to survive on. All of our savings is gone. I no longer have any retirement savings. Nothing. By the end of this month, we will be without anywhere to turn.

Your devoted constituent,

Let Obama have another 4 years, that should fix us. :facepalm:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
1653352_10202428979899119_953195107_n.jpg


.......
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,421
703
113
Jefferson City, Missouri

Scott, are you moving back to where your bloodline began? I was born and raised here and don't feel bad about it.

The famous quote 'To the victor belong the spoils' was coined by Senator William L. Marcy. The spoils that were referred to are basically all of the things that would 'spoil' a person. The spoils could refer to jobs, medals or money, Another way to coin this phrase is 'winner takes all'.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Scott, are you moving back to where your bloodline began? I was born and raised here and don't feel bad about it.

The famous quote 'To the victor belong the spoils' was coined by Senator William L. Marcy. The spoils that were referred to are basically all of the things that would 'spoil' a person. The spoils could refer to jobs, medals or money, Another way to coin this phrase is 'winner takes all'.

among other things I am a full blood Camanche
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
When the going gets tough, the rich dudes stick together. Or at least rich dude Sam Zell did in an interview with Bloomberg TV Wednesday.

The billionaire chairman of Equity Group Investments backed up fellow rich guy Tom Perkins, who set off a firestorm when he recently compared the "progressive war on the 1 percent" to Nazi anti-Semitism in a letter to the Wall Street Journal. (He later apologized for using the word "Kristallnacht" but defended the overall "message.")

"I guess my feeling is that he?s right," Zell said when asked by Bloomberg's Betty Liu how he felt about Perkins' stance. "The 1 percent are being pummeled because it?s politically convenient to do so."

Zell then said the problem is that all non-rich are just jealous that they don't have the same work ethic that the country's wealthiest do.

"The problem is that the world and this country should not talk about envy of the 1 percent. It should talk about emulating the 1 percent," he said. "The 1 percent work harder. The 1 percent are much bigger factors in all forms of our society."

Liu countered that the ever-widening gulf between the richest and poorest Americans must make it harder for those living under the poverty line to get ahead, no?

Nah, said Zell.

"Lots of people have come from nowhere and become part of the 1 percent," he said.

......................................................................................................
Jane S. (peacekitten)
489
.
it is highly amusing that those who have no value to society, and in fact are considerable detriments to it, assume that all others should want to be like them.

or it would be, if it didn't entail so much suffering.

people like mr. zell and that perkins thing are the very definition of "parasite," attached to the rest of us and draining the blood from our veins like ticks.

they are abusive personalities, malignant narcistists, and the rest of us are their victims, the targets of their abuse.

this man is the chair of an equity investments group, like bain capital. these businesses by their very nature ruin lives, destroy jobs and economic opportunity for others.

send this man down a coal mine to work, or onto a farm to pick fruits and vegetables, or into a fire station, or into a classroom. send him out to clean hotel rooms, or to construct roads and schools. send him out to work in a hospital emergency room, or to patrol a beat in watts, or the south side of chicago.

he has absolutely no clue whatsoever what real work is. the people he claims have no work ethic don't have the luxury of going out on their $500 million yacht on the weekends to get away from it all. they don't take private planes so they don't have to be inconvenienced at the airport. they don't have a private masseuse come to their private home spa to help them relax after they've taken a dip in their giant swimming pool. they don't have a staff to wipe their bottoms for them when they come home from work.

these people are pathological. they are so diseased and defective they can't help themselves. they consider themselves as gods walking among mortals, and are offended that we don't worship them accordingly.

they can easily afford what they need most of all, which is serious professional help, along with cult deprogramming and possible medication. reality is a place of which they have no concept. they aren't even capable of comprehending it.

the only thing that zell and his personal ballwasher perkins will ever understand is to lose everything. to have no money, and no hope of ever having it again.

keep it up, zell. pride goeth before a fall, and your arrogance will be your undoing. keep it up, and you'll end up like louis xvi. and *no one* will shed a single tear that such a valuable individual as yourself is no more.

wanker.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/o-nS8wgQNRk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

..................
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/IpQ2Agsuvgc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

.........
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
WASHINGTON -- President Obama will not include cuts to Social Security and other earned-benefit programs in his upcoming budget, the White House confirmed on Thursday.

The cuts had been included in past proposals to lure Republicans into a so-called "grand bargain" that would raise taxes and cut spending with the goal of deficit reduction. The president faced fierce resistance to the cuts, and while Republicans liked the idea, they never agreed to pair the policy with higher taxes.

The withdrawal of the offer from the budget is a recognition of the reality that a grand bargain is simply too unpopular on both sides of the aisle. The death of the grand bargain, first reported by the Associated Press on Thursday, comes as annual budget deficits have fallen from more than $1 trillion to less than $500 billion next year.

The Social Security cut would have worked by using a stingier formula for annual benefit increases known as cost-of-living adjustments, reducing Social Security spending by $127 billion over 10 years, according an estimate by the Congressional Budget Office. The difference in monthly benefits under a chained CPI would be modest at first, but the amount of missed benefits would mount for seniors the longer they live.

Republicans expressed disappointment at Obama's move.:facepalm:

"This reaffirms what has become all too apparent: the president has no interest in doing anything, even modest, to address our looming debt crisis," Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), said in an email. "The one and only idea the president has to offer is even more job-destroying tax hikes, and that non-starter won?t do anything to save the entitlement programs that are critical to so many Americans. With three years left in office, it seems the president is already throwing in the towel."

But White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Thursday the chained CPI offer remains "on the table," if not in the budget.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) shook up the Social Security debate late last year by throwing her weight behind a proposal that would not just keep benefits stable, but would in fact increase payments to retirees. Warren's proposal spotlighted the difficult economic situations many seniors face, and the relative paucity of Social Security checks, moving the debate away from deficit concerns.

"I applaud the President?s decision to exclude chained CPI from the 2015 budget," Warren said in a statement later Thursday. "We are facing a very real and growing retirement crisis in America, and cutting social security is the last thing we should do.?:popcorn2

Social Security's actuaries say the program's trust fund can last until 2033 with no changes, and could pay roughly four-fifths of benefits thereafter. Lifting the cap on payroll taxes, which would require top earners to pay Social Security taxes on all income rather than just the first $117,000, would fully eliminate the funding gap.



Even conservative and moderate Democrats running for reelection in red states in 2014 have bucked the White House on the issue, either opposing the cut or advocating for a hike in payments.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has been one of the loudest critics of the chained CPI, joining with outside groups for press conference after press conference, holding events even when it seemed nobody in Congress or the White House had been discussing it publicly.

"They're working on it as we speak," Sanders said at an event last January when HuffPost asked why he was being so vigilant.

Sanders and other Social Security advocates applauded President Obama's decision Thursday.

"With the middle class struggling and more people living in poverty than ever before, we cannot afford to make life even more difficult for seniors and some of the most vulnerable people in America," Sanders said. "I look forward to working with the president to support the needs of the elderly, the children, the sick and the poor.?

Nancy Altman, co-director of Social Security Works, also hailed the White House's decision. "In light of our looming retirement income crisis, we should be expanding, not cutting, Social Security," Altman said
............................................................................................................................

just raise the fucking cap and be done with it.

fat ass 1% have too much power.

They can stop anything right in America from happening and the middle of us lose SS benifits.

fuck this is a stupid fucked up government
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
WASHINGTON -- When Jan Koum sold his company, WhatsApp, to Facebook for $19 billion on Wednesday, he signed the paperwork against the front door of the welfare office where his family used to collect food stamps.

Koum's not the first famously successful person who has gotten food stamps in the past. Here is a list of 13 others who've received benefits from what is now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which currently benefits 47 million Americans.

bruce springsteen
Bruce Springsteen: The Boss was on food stamps once, at least according to former bandmate Vini "Mad Dog" Lopez, who told The New Yorker's David Remnick in 2012 about Springsteen's early days in Asbury Park.

"In the late afternoon," Remnick wrote, "after lunch, Lopez and I were driving around Asbury Park and he started laughing and pointing. 'That?s where we went to get food stamps -- all of us, Bruce, too,' he said."

Everyone else in the band had a job except Springsteen. "The future working-class clarion never really worked," Remnick reported.

Lopez, for his part, got kicked out of the band right before it made it big. Remnick deemed him "the unluckiest drummer in American history."

patty murray
Sen. Patty Murray: The four-term Democrat from Washington and first female chair of the Senate Budget Committee received food stamps as a teenager. Her father had gotten sick and couldn't run his five-and-dime store on Main Street in Bothell, Wash.

"Thankfully, they lived in a country where the government didn't just say 'tough luck,'" Murray's bio says. "Patty's family received some help from the VA for their father?s medical care, but for several months her family had to rely on food stamps. However, thanks to a program established by the federal government, Patty?s mother was able to go back to school in order to find a better paying job."

ben carson
Dr. Ben Carson: The famous doctor and conservative darling has warned that the welfare state will sap people of their entrepreneurial spirit. He himself, however, benefited from food stamps as a kid.

?By the time I reached ninth grade, mother had made such strides that she received nothing but food stamps," Carson wrote in his book "Gifted Hands." "She couldn?t have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy.?

Celebrity Chef Sandra Lee -- The longtime girlfriend of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo depended on food stamps as a child to help pay the family's bills. As is sometimes the case with people who receive food stamps, which are usually distributed at the beginning of the month, Lee recalled having bare cupboards by the end of the month.

?If we had extra expenses, or even if we were $5 short, that meant we wouldn?t be eating for the last few days of the month," she said.

Ann Dunham: President Barack Obama's mother reportedly received food stamps when he was a baby. That would mean the man conservatives have derided as the "Food Stamp President" for overseeing rapid growth in SNAP enrollment was a food stamp recipient himself.

barbara buono
Barbara Buono: The Democratic state senator who challenged Chris Christie for the New Jersey governorship in 2013 has said she relied on food stamps as a struggling single mother.

"I relied on the social safety net, I relied on food stamps," she said during a campaign event. "So don?t tell me that the social safety net drags people down. It lifts people up."

Sadly for Buono, her food stamp past did not lift her to victory in November.

Craig T. Nelson: The actor and former "Coach" star famously told radio host Glenn Beck that he was once on food stamps. He was strangely trying to make the point that government shouldn't be in the business of bailing people out.

"I've been on food stamps and welfare," Nelson said. "Anybody help me out? No."

Mike McCue: The founder and CEO of the app Flipboard has said his mom received food stamps after his father got sick. McCue is now rich and politically active as well, having bundled money for Obama's campaigns

"I really would not be sitting here today -- heading a company that has created 80 jobs and will create hundreds more -- were it not for those programs," McCue said last year.

Rep. Barbara Lee : The California Democrat once received food stamps herself and has used that experience to help advocate against cuts to the program.

Moby: The musical artist hasn't hid his poor upbringing.

?We were dirt-poor white trash in arguably the wealthiest white town in the country,? Moby told The New York Times. ?I was on food stamps until I was 18 and became an adult.?

Phil Drake: The president of Drake Enterprises, Ltd., is a prominent businessman, a fervent conservative and a tea party enthusiast. He was also once on food stamps.

Kyle Abraham: The choreographer and recent recipient of a MacArthur Foundation "genius grant" told HuffPost he'd once been on food stamps.

"The thing about government assistance is, you don't want to need it," Abraham said."You want to be able to do for yourself however you can."
...........................................................................................................................

just shows you that a hand out can work out for people in the long run
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Everything Rubio touches has turned to shit. The cumulative humiliations have transformed the former party savior into a figure himself in need of saving. How did it all go so badly? The Rubio Plan had sounded clever in the abstract. The premise, as Krauthammer had explicitly laid out, was that the party could jettison a single-issue position while holding fast to its cherished anti-government bromides. (?No reinvention when none is needed,? urged Krauthammer. ?Do conservatism but do it better.?) Krauthammer may have been right that Republican elites would more willingly, or even eagerly, toss aside their fear of illegal immigration than revise their cherished anti-*tax, anti-spending dogma. But broadening the party?s economic message has turned out to be easier. Republicans have delivered a series of well-received speeches advocating new proposals for health care, tax reform, and the like, softening the harsh plutocratic message they projected with Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney. None of this has prevented them from continuing to wage a campaign to immiserate the poor by cutting food stamps, ending unemployment benefits, and denying Medicaid to the uninsured. When you don?t need to grapple with specifics or difficult trade-offs, writing speeches with uplifting themes is extremely easy.
Passing immigration reform, on the other hand, is hard. It requires writing bills. Conservatives liked the sound of Rubio?s immigration plan, but it could not survive legislative contact with the enemy. Compromising on immigration means handing a legislative accomplishment to Obama, a taboo that dwarfs any ideological commitments. And so Rubio was cast in a role nobody could play. The party elders who thought they were enlisting him as the Republican savior were instead making him its martyr................................................................................................................


Hillary vs Rubio


next
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) urged CPAC-goers on Saturday to make the GOP a party of big ideas rather than just fighting against President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

But he still took a number of potshots at the president, whom he sarcastically "defended" for going to Key Largo, Fla., this weekend while the crisis continues in Ukraine. Gingrich said Obama had already been ineffective all week in Washington.

"I believe he can be as ineffective in Key Largo as he was in the White House," he said, receiving a standing ovation from the crowd.

Gingrich also joked that a Hillary Clinton presidency would be a continuation of her husband Bill Clinton's time in the White House.

"If we spend the next three years being primarily anti-Hillary, we will virtually guarantee her election as the first Democrat in almost 70 years to hold the White House for a third term," he joked. "It's a fact," he added when the audience laughed.

The former speaker did discuss his own ideas, saying the GOP should focus on education reform and ensuring smartphone apps aren't over-regulated. He predicted that if the GOP can convince Americans that it will provide them a better future, the party could be dominant.

"If this is a fight between the future and not the past, and we truly represent for the average American a better future and they truly represent for the average American those forces blocking that future, we will win decisively, and we will govern for two generations," he said.

Ray S. (sulray)
27
SUPER USER?140 Fans
The GOP has twice demonstrably failed to convince a majority of Americans that it will provide them a better future. Which is why they have good reason to focus on attacking Obama. When they focus on their beliefs and their plans for the future, they lose elections.:0074
8 MAR 2:14 PM


Suzanne Nimocks (sixties_chick)
21
SUPER USER?1,072 Fans?Women for Obama
The main difference in a Democratic philosophy and a Republican one is this: Most Democrats believe that we are our brother's keeper and that we should treat each other as we would like to be treated while the Republican agenda is to win at the expense of others and feel like they are supremely successful if they can make a bundle of money at someone else's expense.
8 MAR 2:40 PM:0074:0074

22
1,873 Fans?Badges? We don't need no stinkin badges.
They talk about poverty, but offer nothing but more austerity for the poor. They talk about prosperity, but offer nothing but more deregulation for WallStreet . They talk about freedom from big government, but only for the wealthy. They talk about healthcare, but offer only a repeals to the only health care law we have. They talk about compassionate but offer only hate. They talk about peace, but offer fear. :0008

They have nothing to offer to the American people.:0074
8 MAR 2:42 PM
REPLY FAVE SHARE MORE

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Ann Coulter at Saturday at CPAC on Saturday:

"I mean my whole life I've heard Republicans hate black people, I've never seen any evidence of it until I read Marco Rubio's amnesty bill. We are the party that has always stood up for African-Americans. Who gets hurt the most by amnesty, by continuing these immigration policies it is low-wage workers, it is hispanics, it is blacks."
.................................................................................................................................



an attempt by annie to get blacks hating on amnesty


and republicans do hate black people, she knows it.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top