Do you wear a seat belt?

Do you wear a seat belt?

  • Always

    Votes: 61 69.3%
  • Sometimes

    Votes: 19 21.6%
  • Never

    Votes: 8 9.1%

  • Total voters
    88

Jaxx

Go Pokes!
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2003
7,084
88
48
FL
Always. Why die when you don't have to. Would not care to fly through front windshield.
:0008
 

JT

Degenerate
Forum Member
Mar 28, 2000
3,598
81
48
61
Ventura, Ca.
I always do. When I flipped my Tundra a couple of years ago I would have been toast if I didn't. :scared :sadwave:
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
45,211
2,791
113
On the course!
I had my car detail cleaned and the next morning while driving to work, I punched the accelerator to the floor to speed past the people driving 45mph on the interstate to maneuver my car into the left passing lane from the on ramp. When I let up on the accelerator the car kept going faster as the petal was stuck to the god damn floor. My Audi S4 was up to 130 mph before I could get my CAR SEAT undone and pull the accelerator away from the car mat. That was the last fucking time I wore a seat belt and I will never wear one again. :0008


Did you piss off the Blues Brothers?
 

Big Daddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2000
4,382
13
38
69
Wisconsin
For me, on the highway, yes. In town, no, since I never get over 30 mph, and it's less than a mile from home to work.
 

Big Daddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2000
4,382
13
38
69
Wisconsin
I agree that you should wear one, but being REQUIRED BY LAW is fucking nuts.

There are several other things that the government could worry about, like installing breathalyzers in every car, however the alcohol lobbyists would never let that happen, would kill business, eh I mean would be too obstructive to my freedom and an inconvience to blow everytime I start the car.

Interlocks Fail
Technology is never perfect. Whether it?s due to human error or device malfunction, gadgets run into problems.

Interlocks are no different, but the potential problems caused by interlock malfunction are serious.

Robert Strassburger, a Vice President at the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, presented two scenarios in a 2008 presentation about alcohol detection technology:[2]

In the first, alcohol detectors are assumed to be ?Six Sigma? devices. Six Sigma refers to a quality management system in which a product only has 3.4 defective parts per million. In other words, assume 99.99966% of device parts are free of fault.

But even if (and that?s a big ?if?) interlocks met this high standard, Strassburger calculated that there would still be almost 4,000 cases of misreadings per day. That?s thousands of people trying to go to work, school, or about their business who could find their car locked down by a faulty interlock.

In Strassburger?s second scenario, interlocks are only ?3 Sigma? reliable, which he defines as 2,700 defective parts per million. This would cause almost 3 million misclassifications every day.

These ?misclassifications? could go both ways ? allowing a drunk person to start the car or locking the engine of a sober driver.

Aside from the inconvenience of having a car that won?t start due to a false positive, there are legal and privacy implications.

Today?s interlocks record each breath sample and can report how many times the driver attempts to start his or her vehicle after drinking. Similarly, NHTSA has argued that universal interlocks should have the same capacity regarding non-convicted drivers:

One concept employs alcohol-vapor sensors installed in vehicles that can communicate their data to police. The data stream would contain vehicle identifiers as well as alcohol concentrations. A low-cost, short-range service such as WiFi Max or similar would be used as the link. Police could use notebook computers or personal digital assistants (PDAs) to receive the data.[2]

This creates a scary situation for the sober driver whose interlock has malfunctioned.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,217
2,422
113
71
home
I'll be wearing one Friday when I pickup my girls.

"Drandad, PUT YOUR SEAT BELT ON!"
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
45,211
2,791
113
On the course!
Two local accidents this week, where the driver in a one car rollover was thrown from his car, and crushed by it, and a teen boy and girl were both tossed from their car and died.
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
Two local accidents this week, where the driver in a one car rollover was thrown from his car, and crushed by it, and a teen boy and girl were both tossed from their car and died.

That will never happen to the guys here that don't wear them :shrug:
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,217
2,422
113
71
home
Superstitious as I am, I start the very next time I get in the car and for now on. I promise.

Imagine me dying because I didn't wear a seat belt after starting this thread with all the warnings I have been given.

I won't back outta my driveway ever again w/o a seat belt.

Thanks for saving my life, guys. I'm due for an accident as I haven't really had any :0008
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,217
2,422
113
71
home
My worst accident; I was driving by old Baltimore Memorial Stadium during the week (about 1979), running a replacement window lead.

I was looking in the rearview mirror fixing my hair, ran a light and NAILED a guy right in the side. His car flipped over, my head hit the windshield and I got a small cut. His car wound up on it's roof. I ran over and helped him out and the cops were there in seconds. It was about 90 minutes before an Orioles game.

We both rode together to the hospital. I never heard back from him, or his insurance company, and never got an insurance increase either. Weird.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top