Southeast Missouri State--plagerized most the info from book I read on topic--wish I could remember name of book or author but was quite convincing to me--basics- older the culture the more advanced-took in data crime-work ethics/savings arts/ history ect.
Christo--age 56--yes had law enforcer--Paper was not on who came in last--but was discussed.
By the way I never did say who came in last--are you guilty of statistical profiling?
On your question of Jewish voters Matt--As I told you many times I am not prejudice against any race--but am statsitically prejudice.
I don't care for generations of welfare/extreme illegitamate birthrates--high criminal activity--tourching neighborhoods--aids carriers ect
on the flip side applaud all tax paying- productive-non criminal americans regardless of race color or creed.
I let the #'s tell me where the chips fall--not the PC crowds hypothtical wishes.
My very reason for admiration for Jewish citizens--almost 0 contribution to crime/prison population-aids-welfare ect.
Would be epitomy of productive non violent society
back to germany issue--I see their main witness is the old gal they axed and made scapegoat--no axe to grind there.
but more importantly is issue of who liberals are for---remember when Clintons attorney general Clark went to defend Saddam--liberal forum members said he didn't attack us--funny same members applauding this issue I guess their reasoning is the 20th hijacker didn't "quite" attack us either.
My question is will Clark make it back in time from defending Saddam to aid in prosecution or will maybe Reno step up to plate on this one?
One thing is clear--doesn't make diff if it Saddam or 911 hijacker--they can always count on liberals to come to their defence.
Christo--age 56--yes had law enforcer--Paper was not on who came in last--but was discussed.
By the way I never did say who came in last--are you guilty of statistical profiling?
On your question of Jewish voters Matt--As I told you many times I am not prejudice against any race--but am statsitically prejudice.
I don't care for generations of welfare/extreme illegitamate birthrates--high criminal activity--tourching neighborhoods--aids carriers ect
on the flip side applaud all tax paying- productive-non criminal americans regardless of race color or creed.
I let the #'s tell me where the chips fall--not the PC crowds hypothtical wishes.
My very reason for admiration for Jewish citizens--almost 0 contribution to crime/prison population-aids-welfare ect.
Would be epitomy of productive non violent society
back to germany issue--I see their main witness is the old gal they axed and made scapegoat--no axe to grind there.
but more importantly is issue of who liberals are for---remember when Clintons attorney general Clark went to defend Saddam--liberal forum members said he didn't attack us--funny same members applauding this issue I guess their reasoning is the 20th hijacker didn't "quite" attack us either.
My question is will Clark make it back in time from defending Saddam to aid in prosecution or will maybe Reno step up to plate on this one?
One thing is clear--doesn't make diff if it Saddam or 911 hijacker--they can always count on liberals to come to their defence.
Last edited: