Dead silence from rusty.............................................................................................................................................
I'm not buying it.
- Thread starter rusty
- Start date
Dead silence from rusty.............................................................................................................................................
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
Another load of crap dug up by rusty, and which misrepresents the truth by claiming the highest tax rates anywhere, while ignoring states which have no income tax and/or no sales tax, and assuming that everyone pays sales tax on everything plus a dozen other misrepresentations and outright lies.
Why do you keep posting this kind of shit, rusty? Are you THAT fucking dumb?...no...wait...don't answer that.
How much tax do you pay rusty, and how much do you get for your money?
ANSWER THE QUESTION. Don't post any other bullshit, just answer one simple question.
YOU CLAIM HALF YOUR INCOME GOES TO TAXES. SHOW US THE NUMBERS!!!
Last edited:
Of course, he can't show us any real numbers Duff.
Rusty: "If not fo da Gubmint, I be a gabillionare, but da Man is tryin ta keep me down!"
Dogs: "If not fo da Base suckin da Gubmint tit, I be's a gabillionare too Rusty!"
:142smilie
48% .. 42%.. whatever!!! Gov't should be able to survive on 5% fed and 2% state Period!! We are fuxored :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: if we don't stop this bullshit! Inflation is killin' us! dollar is worth dick!! wake up and smell the respirator >> if we don't... we are all toast* nuff said
Lol Duff. no but close.. am his bro in law! haven't posted here in a awhile anywhere on the forum.. I don't gamble anymore because I cannot save a bankroll to play with.. Get real . military? I most likely agree with you on what we are spending to try and "save the world" from terrorists. it's all bulll... come and get us! or at least try. we still can't get out of our own way trying to sell freedom to a barking crowd. 3rd world ideology we do not comprehend that they don't understand what we are trying to sell. big business, big govt'!~ hawaii five 0' whatever.. our liberties I fear will be challenged in the near future to that what we have not comprehended. .we will pay the price for out of control gov't.. Obama got laughed at in his G20 spot.. We've lost our way. too fat too busy to give a shit. most of not paying attention. leave me alone with my 1020dp picture and my radial tires and I will bend over and pay the way.. what happens is unfortunately our own choice to let it be. and we will get what we deserve. most likely anarchy..
Craiger I agree with most ,but not all(the anarchy)you won't get through to their kind which thinks socialism and spreading the wealth leads to a better America,but in reality leads to more spending and higher taxes in some form.
Your correct on the inflation.Our kids will be paying that for a long time.Although there is no way to break down exactly how much we earn and how much we pay in taxes its safe to say Duff we are paying close to 40% and yes possibly 50%.
And if 50% seems high the road were heading down will bring us there,how can you argue this.How much do you think were paying DuFF,I would love to hear.
Your correct on the inflation.Our kids will be paying that for a long time.Although there is no way to break down exactly how much we earn and how much we pay in taxes its safe to say Duff we are paying close to 40% and yes possibly 50%.
And if 50% seems high the road were heading down will bring us there,how can you argue this.How much do you think were paying DuFF,I would love to hear.
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
:facepalm:
I just don't know what to say anymore. I actually have to re-read some of these posts to actually believe that someone actually said what I read.
I just don't know what to say anymore. I actually have to re-read some of these posts to actually believe that someone actually said what I read.
Tax plan to hit Mass. wallets
Tax plan to hit Mass. wallets
Tax plan to hit Mass. wallets
By Natalie Sherman and Christine McConville
Monday, December 13, 2010 - Updated 3 hours ago
The political battle still raging in Washington over tax cuts could have a dramatic effect on Bay State billfolds no matter how it is resolved, local experts said.
Beacon Hill Institute boss David Tuerck noted that the Bay State economy relies heavily on high-tech investment, which theoretically will be fueled by maintaining the tax cuts.
?It?s important for taxes to be kept low and to be kept low with predictability going into the future,? Tuerck said.
But it isn?t as much whether your taxes are going up or not in a few weeks? time, according to Harvard University economist Gregory Mankiw.
?What will they do going forward? I don?t think anyone wanted to see a huge tax increase on Jan. 1. I don?t think anyone thought that was a solution,? said Mankiw, who supports the White House-GOP extension of the Bush-era tax cuts at all income levels ? low, middle and high. Now, the big question is, he said, ?Are they going to take the deficit seriously??
He and others say a deficit of more than $1.3 trillion is a ticking time bomb. Opponents say nearly $900 billion in tax relief and unemployment benefits just makes that worse.
Michael Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said the part of the controversial deal that extends unemployment benefits will help the Bay State economy in the short term.
?The unemployment provisions are certainly important for Massachusetts, and nationally the extension will have the most positive short-term economic impact, unlike some of the tax cuts which are, at least in the short term, not as much of an economic incentive,? Widmer said.
The issue remains unresolved though many observers expect to see it pass largely intact in Congress this week. It was a remarkable past week as Capitol Hill Democrats turned on President Obama, who raised eyebrows as he turned to former President Bill Clinton to hawk the $855 billion plan.
?To have Obama and Clinton stand up there and say the right thing for the economy over the next two years is the Bush tax cuts ? that?s a pretty big victory for conservatives,? said Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol. But of Obama, he said, ?at the end of the day he?s in a much better position. He?s showed his willingness to cut a deal.?
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said, ?The president was dealt a very tough hand. All 42 Senate Republicans voted in lockstep to hold the middle-class tax cuts and unemployment insurance hostage, and our Democratic caucus wasn?t unified.? Still, he said of the jobless benefits extension: ?It?s a very steep price to pay for something the Senate should?ve done months ago as a matter of decency and common sense, but how do you cut off 52,000 people in Massachusetts who need those unemployment benefits??
Tax plan to hit Mass. wallets
Tax plan to hit Mass. wallets
By Natalie Sherman and Christine McConville
Monday, December 13, 2010 - Updated 3 hours ago
The political battle still raging in Washington over tax cuts could have a dramatic effect on Bay State billfolds no matter how it is resolved, local experts said.
Beacon Hill Institute boss David Tuerck noted that the Bay State economy relies heavily on high-tech investment, which theoretically will be fueled by maintaining the tax cuts.
?It?s important for taxes to be kept low and to be kept low with predictability going into the future,? Tuerck said.
But it isn?t as much whether your taxes are going up or not in a few weeks? time, according to Harvard University economist Gregory Mankiw.
?What will they do going forward? I don?t think anyone wanted to see a huge tax increase on Jan. 1. I don?t think anyone thought that was a solution,? said Mankiw, who supports the White House-GOP extension of the Bush-era tax cuts at all income levels ? low, middle and high. Now, the big question is, he said, ?Are they going to take the deficit seriously??
He and others say a deficit of more than $1.3 trillion is a ticking time bomb. Opponents say nearly $900 billion in tax relief and unemployment benefits just makes that worse.
Michael Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said the part of the controversial deal that extends unemployment benefits will help the Bay State economy in the short term.
?The unemployment provisions are certainly important for Massachusetts, and nationally the extension will have the most positive short-term economic impact, unlike some of the tax cuts which are, at least in the short term, not as much of an economic incentive,? Widmer said.
The issue remains unresolved though many observers expect to see it pass largely intact in Congress this week. It was a remarkable past week as Capitol Hill Democrats turned on President Obama, who raised eyebrows as he turned to former President Bill Clinton to hawk the $855 billion plan.
?To have Obama and Clinton stand up there and say the right thing for the economy over the next two years is the Bush tax cuts ? that?s a pretty big victory for conservatives,? said Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol. But of Obama, he said, ?at the end of the day he?s in a much better position. He?s showed his willingness to cut a deal.?
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said, ?The president was dealt a very tough hand. All 42 Senate Republicans voted in lockstep to hold the middle-class tax cuts and unemployment insurance hostage, and our Democratic caucus wasn?t unified.? Still, he said of the jobless benefits extension: ?It?s a very steep price to pay for something the Senate should?ve done months ago as a matter of decency and common sense, but how do you cut off 52,000 people in Massachusetts who need those unemployment benefits??
WTF? You don't file fed, state and local tax returns? You don't pay property taxes? You don't pay sales taxes? You don't buy gasoline? You don't know when you pay other taxes?
How, rusty, can you whine about something you don't even know about? You don't know where you're money goes?
No wonder you're broke.
Here, Ill help you get started -
You whine about not making much, so I assumed you make $40K per year and have two dependents and no other deductions.
Your gross pay = $40K = $763.29/week
Fed inc tax + FICA + Medicare = $92.62
Federal taxes = 12% of your gross income. That's TWELVE PERCENT.
http://www.paycheckcity.com/NetPayCalc/netpayCalcResult.asp
Your Mass income tax will be about $25. That's another 3%. THREE PERCENT.
So how do you get to 50%?
Never mind, I know how you get it. You pull it out of your ass.
Last edited:
You have seemed to have left out all the other taxes that me and you pay (at least me,I got a feeling your on the free ride plan)for example would be sales tax!Oh!we for got that one.Property tax Oh! we forgot that one.!! Federal corp. income tax,Oh! we forgot that one.Misc. gov't fees,Oh we forgot that one
If you wanna calculate every dollar I'm being squeezed by the above mentioned be my guest.Esp the hidden fees and sales tax part.Get real Duff.
Don't sugercoat it with wages earned and taxes taken out of pay:142smilie it goes deeper then that,you do know that?right?:scared
12%:142smilie That's being genereous.
I didn't forget anything, asshole. It's your turn to provide some facts.
How much do YOU pay in other taxes?
I'd like to also know how much corporate tax YOU pay.
Until and unless you can come up with some facts, how about you shut up and go away.:moon:
Like I said a good estimate (conservative)is between 35%-$40% ,50% is not out of the question.I don't need facts to back up a point.If you ask me its plain to see where my moneys going and its not in my wallet.
Oh one more thing I forgot retirement(social security included)It's safe to say they will have their hand in the cookie jar there as well.
There already robbing me on SS and I was kind and left that out of the %.
