penguinfan/The Boys...The Challenge Flag has been thrown.....
- Thread starter Sportsaholic
- Start date
- Status
Yup you got me, The Boys has retained my services "Pro BONO" so to speak.......:SIB
If you look at the standings in the contest below:
penguinfan.....-6.....6.....0.... (29-31)
Sportsaholic.....5.....-6.....-1.....(29-28)
TheBoys.....2.....-3.....-1.....(30-30)
I finished right dab in the middle....so yes this peaked my interest.......The Boys has more "wins" 30-29....as stated in PF's highlighted post, see below.
PF then posted this Gem:
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=510476
Which led to this Gem:
http://madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=490173
Which highlights the following:
Originally Posted by penguinfan
I would be willing to have a handicapping contest with you.
My rules are simple:
1. 5 plays a week, sides or totals. No parlays or gimmicks. No moneylines. Duration of the regular season.
2. I will flip a coin for my 5 plays since I haven't handicapped in a while.
3. We use the closing line from a book of your choice as long as it can be accessed and verified by someone other than us if need be.
4. Most wins against the spread or total is the winner.
Loser leaves the forum for good. Since you have already proven you can't keep your word on something like that we must have Jack's blessing that he will ban the loser.
My terms are simple and non-negotiable.
So yes, I'm confused by what PF has posted......Any more questions?
- Apr 15, 2001
- 4,135
- 63
- 0
I disagree, this site, this community this fellowship of a sort may not have started with such different views, yet here we are, and thriving! :0074 never be the one to cast the first stone,
for the record Deezy, your one of the best here :0074 :toast:
and don't get me started on mlk :nono: :0074 :toast:
I'm not sure where we disagreed in the past that you have this witch hunt going on, but how can I be anymore clear than I have already been on this?
Read the entire thread, don't just pick and choose. If you can't figure it out after that, well, I probably can't help you.
I'm sure others can see what I am saying. Sorry you don't like that he lost. I'm actually on the verge of telling Jack to just forget it and let him back in because it seems to be an unpopular decision with some members who I didn't even know I had a problem with.
I really didn't want to be a prick about this, but I might just dig my heels in here and be the bad guy.
opcorn2
:shrug:
I didn't start this, was just confused by what's been posted........Enjoy your win :shrug:
Are you?
hung jury n. slang for a hopelessly deadlocked jury in a criminal case, in which neither side is able to prevail. Usually it means there is no unanimous verdict (although in Oregon and Louisiana 10 of 12 jurors can convict or acquit). If the jury is hung the trial judge will declare a mistrial. A new trial from scratch, with a new jury panel, is required. The prosecutor can decide not to re-try the case, particularly if a majority of the jury favored acquittal. (See: jury, dismissal, trial, mistrial)
- Apr 15, 2001
- 4,135
- 63
- 0
There is no way anyone with an IQ over 15 is confused by what the rules/terms were.
I know you don't like this and I'm honestly sorry about that. Had he shown an ounce of decency or respect we wouldn't be here going through this.
I normally like watching a good mind fucking, but I beg you to stop before PF actually comes off looking like the the bad errrrrrrrrrrrrrrr worse guy in this soap
- Feb 23, 2005
- 6,744
- 129
- 63
- Feb 23, 2005
- 6,744
- 129
- 63
- Apr 15, 2001
- 4,135
- 63
- 0
so you feel that all terms of an agreement to wager were met on the second wager?
He won! You won! Push! live to fight another day!
though i still think you won :SIB
but that is something he will always know as well!, you win twice :shrug:
- Status
