Well, she's not guilty.......

[Nole]

I thought it might turn out like that. Way too much reasonable doubt if you ask me.

She sure didn't act like a Mom who's kid was missing though. She has issues.



"But the jury convicted Anthony on four counts of providing false information to law enforcement officers."

Ya think?







Riots anywhere yet?


Vancouver?

 

[MadJack]

Who's not guilty? :shrug:

 

[Nole]

Who's not guilty? :shrug:

Casey Anthony.

 

[Woodson]

Somebody is guilty. I'm going to say you google chloroform 84 times along with neck breaking...

Somebody is guilty... and I think she may be walking free on Thursday time served.

 

[MadJack]

Casey Anthony.

I guess that's who my mother is always talking about. "The Trial".

I wonder what mom thinks about not guilty?

I'll let you know :0008

 

[hogman14]

Today Casey Anthony. Tomorrow Roger Clemens.

 

[gardenweasel]

i`m glad it`s over...you can`t even watch the news without getting bombarded with this....

i watched none of it..until the closing arguments...and the prosecution struck me as bloodthirsty ghouls....i`ll bet they were perceived by the jurors in the same way...

i have no idea what happened...probably the mother either did something malicious...or stupid.....or both....but that family has been put through an inhuman amount of torture....

after listening to pundits like jeanine pirro on fox,i was disgusted by the bloodlust in the media....

the media was incredibly blood thirsty...

ia part of me is glad to see the prosecution take it up the ass...and a part of me feels like the child didn`t get justice... .i think they overplayed their hand by going for a murder 1 conviction...

this family is forever ruined...very sad...

 

[Cie]

A known, although apparently not proven, murderer is now on the streets. If she would kill her daughter, what would she do to someone else's kid. We are all a little less safe than we were yesterday.

 

[MadJack]

Does she have the money for her defense expenses?








































NOW I get interested in this :lol:

 

[Woodson]

I lived in Tampa when this all went down. So have an interest in it even to this day.

The thing that I hate most besides the DA's decision to go for a grand slam ultimately throwing justice away, is the fact that SHE WILL MAKE MILLIONS ON THIS STORY SEEING AS SHE WAS FOUND INNOCENT OF MURDER CHARGES.

CHA CHING. opcorn2

 

[hogman14]

Don't worry, they'll probably get Casey Anthony when she tries to steal back her sports memorabilia...

 

[theGibber1]

Personally I am shocked. Unlike some of you I watched a ton of this..

At first I didnt think this cute girl could do this to a baby.. But the evidence I saw quickly changed my mind..

First off she never reported the girl missing.. Her parents called the police and told them she hadn?t seen her granddaughter in 31 days and that her daughters trunk smells like there was a body in it.. Only then did she report the girl missing.. FUCKING RED FLAG! HELLO!

The baby was found wrapped up in a white travel bag.. This particular bag was sold as a set. They found the matching bag in her closet for god sakes!

One thing I didnt know was they can tell when hair is on a live person or a deceased person. They found Caylees hair in this bitches trunk that was after her death..

And these jurors think she had nothing to do with it?? Not even child abuse??? If your child is missing and you are out partying and sleeping around with your boyfriend and never report it... is this not at leasst child abuse???

I mean if they think she had absolutely nothing to do with it who do they think did??

uggghhh sickening

 

[neverteaseit]

Right or wrong this is what makes America ... America.

Reasonable doubt is all you need. I am sure Nancy Grace has jumped out a window by now. I would have a party if that happened. GASHAG!

Searching for things on the internet does not make you guilty last time I checked. That is like saying all of us that look at porn on the net are sex offenders.

The defense did what it needed to do, it started chopping the witnesses up one by one and before you know it, doubt begins to creep in.

Once again all the so-called t.v. experts are wrong again. Funny how that seems to work each and everytime.

I was not there nor did I watch the case. I will allow the judicial system to decide that. Which they did.

 

[Nole]

Right or wrong this is what makes America ... America.

Reasonable doubt is all you need. I am sure Nancy Grace has jumped out a window by now. I would have a party if that happened. GASHAG!

Searching for things on the internet does not make you guilty last time I checked. That is like saying all of us that look at porn on the net are sex offenders.

The defense did what it needed to do, it started chopping the witnesses up one by one and before you know it, doubt begins to creep in.

Once again all the so-called t.v. experts are wrong again. Funny how that seems to work each and everytime.

I was not there nor did I watch the case. I will allow the judicial system to decide that. Which they did.

Agreed.

I'm recording Nancy Grace. Her head may blow up on National TV ala Scanners.

 

[Woodson]

Hogman, hilarious. :0008

 

[gardenweasel]

it`s possible that the madjack`s annual golf outing crew may run into her if she follows o.j.`s lead.......

relentlessly searching golf courses throughout the country for the real killer....


.

 

[neverteaseit]

Agreed.

I'm recording Nancy Grace. Her head may blow up on National TV ala Scanners.

LOL Scanners

Now you got a mob of people who probably know nothing about this case outside the courthouse talking on camera saying it is OJx2.

Once again. Reasonable doubt is all you need. Nothing more, nothing less. She may be guilty. But if the defense can prove reasonable doubt you cannot convict someone. Like it or not it is the best system in the world and it has also wrongfully convicted or not convicted many before her.

 

[gardenweasel]

it`s all about going for murder 1,imo....i believe that some jury decisions are driven by the possibility of the death penalty. ....does it make it harder to literally "pull the trigger" on a guilty verdict?....

imo,yeah,it probably does....and i`m not against the death penalty...

 

[ImFeklhr]

LOL Scanners

Now you got a mob of people who probably know nothing about this case outside the courthouse talking on camera saying it is OJx2.

Once again. Reasonable doubt is all you need. Nothing more, nothing less. She may be guilty. But if the defense can prove reasonable doubt you cannot convict someone. Like it or not it is the best system in the world and it has also wrongfully convicted or not convicted many before her.

One thing the judge "explained" to us the couple of times I've served on juries: Reasonable doubt doesn't mean ANY doubt. He said something to the effect of "just because you can draw up one scenario where the person did not commit the crime, it does not necessarily mean there is reasonable doubt, and it is up to the jurors to decide what is and isn't reasonable."
:0003

 

[neverteaseit]

One thing the judge "explained" to us the couple of times I've served on juries: Reasonable doubt doesn't mean ANY doubt. He said something to the effect of "just because you can draw up one scenario where the person did not commit the crime, it does not necessarily mean there is reasonable doubt, and it is up to the jurors to decide what is and isn't reasonable."
:0003

True.. But at the same time unless you are convinced someone is guilty how can you convict them? Is that not how the system works? There are 12 jurors who all seemed to come to the same conclusion in the end. If not would'nt there be a hung jury?

I am not saying the woman is innocent. Many think she is guilty. She may be. I wonder about the parents. Is it possible they could have been involved? I have no idea.

I do have a problem with all of these gasbags on tv saying guilty, guilty, guilty years before the trail even begins. How do you even compile an impartial jury?

Right or wrong the system works more often than not.