I guess the ghost of the drunk has not been around because alabama has only beaten Auburn 1 time in Tuscalooser in 3 centruries of playing football there.
No need for me to post, but I will....
Auburn + anything is free money, Bama can't hang. I would love for one person on here to tell my why Bama will win this game. :toast:
I will tell you exactly why Bama will or could win this game, ITS THE IRON BOWL! If you are from Bham like your profile says then you should know that. Anything can and will happen in the Iron Bowl. It always does. Its a rivalry game, records, and lines mean nothing. After seeing around 30 (too many to count) of these games in person, I know that and you should too. Being a Bama fan I hope Bama wins but I wouldnt be surprised if Auburn wins by 20. I also wouldnt be surprised if Bama wins by 20. You just never know with this game, thats why I never bet on this one. I just watch and enjoy. All these Auburn fans are so upset about the line around here, if you are an Auburn fan and are so confident in Auburn (Cam) then you should be happy with the line and be betting it big time. GL!:toast:
Well, I understand about the anything can happen but the fact is the higher ranked team almost always win this one. I'm not upset, I'm happy as hell we are the dog in this one. :0074
don't believe thats true...... the dog in this one don't & won't hunt..... me thinks your holding onto fools gold....the fact is : " the higher ranked team almost always win this one "....... thats funny ...
I love how you think you know more about this game than I do.
Since 1981, the team with the better record has won the Iron Bowl 70 percent of the time. That's higher than the rate for many other late-season rivalry games, including Florida-Florida State, Oregon-Oregon State, Harvard-Yale, Georgia-Auburn, Michigan-Ohio State and USC-UCLA.
Auburn has two more wins than Alabama. When they are separated by two wins or more, the team with the better record has won 35 of 42 times (83 percent) since 1948. :sadwave:
AU will win by ten at least, and here is why:
Versus 5 common opponents this year
Auburn D ? allowing 5.5 yppl, 369 yds, 26 ppg,
Bama D ? allowing 5.4 yppl, 341 ypg, 20 ppg
Entire Season Bama D is allowing 4.7yppl to teams averaging 5.5 (+0.8)?.AU D allowing 5.2 yppl to teams that average 5.7 yppl (+0.5)?average Offense has 65-70 total plays/game which makes Bama D 21 yards better than Bama (+0.8-+0.5=+0.3 * 70 plays =21yards).
Vs 5 common opponents this year
AU O- 6.9 yppl, 482 ypg, 38 ppg
Bama O- 6.0yppl, 373 ypg, 24 ppg
Entire season
AU O is +1.8yppl (using same approach as D above)?Bama O is +1.2yppl, giving AU O vs Bama O a 42 yards edge.
O vs O and D vs D while interesting doesn?t really matter given the O plays D?AU O has +1.0 yppl edge on Bama D whereas Bama O has +0.6 yppl edge on AU D.
Bama had +3 TO margin when compared to Auburn (largely random and skews the yards per point ratio which explains the 5.4-5.5 yppl, similar total yardage, yet TD differential in ppg.
Bama O projects -0.1 ypr disadvantage rushing compared to a +1.8 ypr edge for the AU O?.Bama Pass O has +1.2 ypa edge compared to AU +1.0ypa.
For those of you who see the above as Sanskrit this equals very good match ups for AU.
That is all.
Does it bother you that tlankford is going to jack off to this post?
I imagine jrush will have a mess on his keyboard shortly as well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.