That's where we differ gags. I believe for one person to look another in the eye and say you did this. ... There should be proof.I find it comical that this thread is now 114 posts long debating this.
FDC, I said this 100 posts ago that 100% evidence is not needed. This isn't a court case. There is enough evidence with the texts. And not cooperating with the investigation piles onto it.
I swear to Christ I'm done coming into this thread and debating this with someone that fails to see the violation. Enjoy your day. :mj01:
This is Brady's job. Would you accept this level of evidence against yourself if your place of employment were suspending you.
I don't agree with it, sorry. I don't believe you suspend the burden of proof simply because it's the nfl and Tom Brady.
I assure you this suspension would not stand a chance in hell to survive a grievance in any union I've ever been a part of.
No matter how you explain this as him being guilty, you have to make assumptions in order to present it. Sorry, I don't believe you can fine someone or suspend them in any other trade union with assumption.
Also, didn't the report say that the Patriots organization "kinda sorta, probably, I betcha any money, he's a dick anyway, you know they wanted to, magic 8 ball says not likely that the organization wasn't involved yet they lose draft picks?
Goodell is an absolute moron.

